Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1000 CNY

100.0%

CWE-94 (对生成代码的控制不恰当(代码注入)) — Vulnerability Class 1335

1335 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-94 (对生成代码的控制不恰当(代码注入)). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-94 represents a critical code injection weakness where software constructs executable code using untrusted input without proper sanitization. Attackers typically exploit this vulnerability by injecting malicious scripts or commands into user-supplied fields, such as web forms or API parameters, which the application then executes directly. This allows adversaries to bypass security controls, steal sensitive data, or gain unauthorized administrative access to the underlying system. To prevent such exploits, developers must rigorously validate and sanitize all external inputs, ensuring that only expected characters are processed. Implementing strict allow-listing strategies, utilizing parameterized queries for database interactions, and avoiding dynamic code execution functions like eval() are essential defensive measures. By treating all user input as potentially hostile and applying robust encoding techniques, organizations can effectively neutralize injection vectors and maintain application integrity.

MITRE CWE Description
The product constructs all or part of a code segment using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the syntax or behavior of the intended code segment.
Common Consequences (4)
Access ControlBypass Protection Mechanism
In some cases, injectable code controls authentication; this may lead to a remote vulnerability.
Access ControlGain Privileges or Assume Identity
Injected code can access resources that the attacker is directly prevented from accessing.
Integrity, Confidentiality, AvailabilityExecute Unauthorized Code or Commands
When a product allows a user's input to contain code syntax, it might be possible for an attacker to craft the code in such a way that it will alter the intended control flow of the product. As a result, code injection can often result in the execution of arbitrary code. Code injection attacks can…
Non-RepudiationHide Activities
Often the actions performed by injected control code are unlogged.
Mitigations (5)
Architecture and DesignRefactor your program so that you do not have to dynamically generate code.
Architecture and DesignRun your code in a "jail" or similar sandbox environment that enforces strict boundaries between the process and the operating system. This may effectively restrict which code can be executed by your product. Examples include the Unix chroot jail and AppArmor. In general, managed code may provide some protection. This may not be a feasible solution, and it only limits the impact to the operating s…
ImplementationAssume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range…
TestingUse dynamic tools and techniques that interact with the product using large test suites with many diverse inputs, such as fuzz testing (fuzzing), robustness testing, and fault injection. The product's operation may slow down, but it should not become unstable, crash, or generate incorrect results.
OperationRun the code in an environment that performs automatic taint propagation and prevents any command execution that uses tainted variables, such as Perl's "-T" switch. This will force the program to perform validation steps that remove the taint, although you must be careful to correctly validate your inputs so that you do not accidentally mark dangerous inputs as untainted (see CWE-183 and CWE-184).
Examples (2)
This example attempts to write user messages to a message file and allow users to view them.
$MessageFile = "messages.out"; if ($_GET["action"] == "NewMessage") { $name = $_GET["name"]; $message = $_GET["message"]; $handle = fopen($MessageFile, "a+"); fwrite($handle, "<b>$name</b> says '$message'<hr>\n"); fclose($handle); echo "Message Saved!<p>\n"; } else if ($_GET["action"] == "ViewMessages") { include($MessageFile); }
Bad · PHP
name=h4x0r message=%3C?php%20system(%22/bin/ls%20-l%22);?%3E
Attack
edit-config.pl: This CGI script is used to modify settings in a configuration file.
use CGI qw(:standard); sub config_file_add_key { my ($fname, $key, $arg) = @_; # code to add a field/key to a file goes here } sub config_file_set_key { my ($fname, $key, $arg) = @_; # code to set key to a particular file goes here } sub config_file_delete_key { my ($fname, $key, $arg) = @_; # code to delete key from a particular file goes here } sub handleConfigAction { my ($fname, $action) = @_; my $key = param('key'); my $val = param('val'); # this is super-efficient code, especially if you have to invoke # any one of dozens of different functions! my $code = "config_file_$action_key(\$fnam
Bad · Perl
add_key(",","); system("/bin/ls");
Attack
CVE IDTitleCVSSSeverityPublished
CVE-2026-20892 Micro Research MR-GM5L-S1和Micro Research MR-GM5A-L1 代码注入漏洞 — MR-GM5L-S1 7.2AIHighAI2026-03-11
CVE-2026-2273 Schneider Electric EcoStruxure Automation Expert 代码注入漏洞 — EcoStruxure™ Automation Expert 7.8AIHighAI2026-03-10
CVE-2026-30960 RSSN has Arbitrary Code Execution via Unvalidated JIT Instruction Generation in C-FFI Interface — rssn 9.8AICriticalAI2026-03-10
CVE-2026-30887 OneUptime Affected by Unsandboxed Code Execution in Probe Allows Any Project Member to Achieve RCE — oneuptime 10.0 Critical2026-03-09
CVE-2026-3352 Easy PHP Settings <= 1.0.4 - Authenticated (Administrator+) PHP Code Injection via 'wp_memory_limit' Setting — Easy PHP Settings 7.2 High2026-03-07
CVE-2026-29075 Mesa: Checking out of untrusted code in `benchmarks.yml` workflow may lead to code execution in privileged runner — mesa 8.3 High2026-03-06
CVE-2026-2830 WP All Import <= 4.0.0 - Reflected Cross-Site Scripting via 'filepath' — WP All Import – Drag & Drop Import for CSV, XML, Excel & Google Sheets 6.1 Medium2026-03-06
CVE-2026-29039 changedetection.io: XPath - Arbitrary File Read via unparsed-text() — changedetection.io 6.5 -2026-03-06
CVE-2026-28801 Natro Macro: Code Injection through Pattern/Path files — NatroMacro 6.6 Medium2026-03-06
CVE-2026-25888 Chartbrew: Remote Code Execution (RCE) via Vulnerable API — chartbrew 8.8 High2026-03-06
CVE-2026-25887 Chartbrew: Remote Code Execution (RCE) via MongoDB Dataset Query — chartbrew 7.2 High2026-03-06
CVE-2026-28134 WordPress JetEngine plugin <= 3.7.2 - Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability — JetEngine 8.5 High2026-03-05
CVE-2026-27984 WordPress Widget Options plugin <= 4.1.3 - Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability — Widget Options 9.0 Critical2026-03-05
CVE-2026-22390 WordPress Builderall Builder for WordPress plugin <= 3.0.1 - Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability — Builderall Builder for WordPress 9.9 Critical2026-03-05
CVE-2026-28783 Craft has a Twig Function Blocklist Bypass — cms 7.2AIHighAI2026-03-04
CVE-2025-59059 Apache Ranger: Remote Code Execution Vulnerability in NashornScriptEngineCreator — Apache Ranger 9.8AICriticalAI2026-03-03
CVE-2026-21853 AFFiNE: One-click Remote Code Execution through Custom URL Handling — AFFiNE 8.8 High2026-03-02
CVE-2026-3132 Master Addons for Elementor Premium <= 2.1.3 - Authenticated (Subscriber+) Remote Code Execution via render_preview — Master Addons for Elementor Premium 8.8 High2026-03-02
CVE-2026-3409 eosphoros-ai db-gpt Flow Import Endpoint import importlib.machinery.SourceFileLoader.exec_module code injection — db-gpt 7.3 High2026-03-02
CVE-2026-3395 MaxSite CMS MarkItUp Preview AJAX Endpoint preview-ajax.php eval code injection — CMS 7.3 High2026-03-01
CVE-2026-28425 Statamic vulnerable to remote code execution via Antlers-enabled control panel inputs — cms 8.0 High2026-02-27
CVE-2026-21658 Johnson Controls -Frick Quantum HD- Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution — Frick Controls Quantum HD 9.8 -2026-02-27
CVE-2026-21657 Johnson Controls -Frick Quantum HD- Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution — Frick Controls Quantum HD 6.8 -2026-02-27
CVE-2026-21656 Johnson Controls -Frick Quantum HD- Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution — Frick Controls Quantum HD 6.8 -2026-02-27
CVE-2026-27966 Langflow has Remote Code Execution in CSV Agent — langflow 9.8 Critical2026-02-26
CVE-2026-27952 Agenta has Python Sandbox Escape, Leading to Remote Code Execution (RCE) — agenta-api 8.8 High2026-02-26
CVE-2026-27498 n8n has Arbitrary Command Execution via File Write and Git Operations — n8n 8.8AIHighAI2026-02-25
CVE-2026-27577 n8n: Expression Sandbox Escape Leads to RCE — n8n 9.9AICriticalAI2026-02-25
CVE-2026-27497 n8n has Potential Remote Code Execution via Merge Node — n8n 8.8AIHighAI2026-02-25
CVE-2026-27495 n8n has a Sandbox Escape in its JavaScript Task Runner — n8n 8.5AIHighAI2026-02-25

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-94 (对生成代码的控制不恰当(代码注入)) represent 1335 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.