Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1000 CNY

100.0%

CWE-94 (对生成代码的控制不恰当(代码注入)) — Vulnerability Class 1335

1335 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-94 (对生成代码的控制不恰当(代码注入)). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-94 represents a critical code injection weakness where software constructs executable code using untrusted input without proper sanitization. Attackers typically exploit this vulnerability by injecting malicious scripts or commands into user-supplied fields, such as web forms or API parameters, which the application then executes directly. This allows adversaries to bypass security controls, steal sensitive data, or gain unauthorized administrative access to the underlying system. To prevent such exploits, developers must rigorously validate and sanitize all external inputs, ensuring that only expected characters are processed. Implementing strict allow-listing strategies, utilizing parameterized queries for database interactions, and avoiding dynamic code execution functions like eval() are essential defensive measures. By treating all user input as potentially hostile and applying robust encoding techniques, organizations can effectively neutralize injection vectors and maintain application integrity.

MITRE CWE Description
The product constructs all or part of a code segment using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the syntax or behavior of the intended code segment.
Common Consequences (4)
Access ControlBypass Protection Mechanism
In some cases, injectable code controls authentication; this may lead to a remote vulnerability.
Access ControlGain Privileges or Assume Identity
Injected code can access resources that the attacker is directly prevented from accessing.
Integrity, Confidentiality, AvailabilityExecute Unauthorized Code or Commands
When a product allows a user's input to contain code syntax, it might be possible for an attacker to craft the code in such a way that it will alter the intended control flow of the product. As a result, code injection can often result in the execution of arbitrary code. Code injection attacks can…
Non-RepudiationHide Activities
Often the actions performed by injected control code are unlogged.
Mitigations (5)
Architecture and DesignRefactor your program so that you do not have to dynamically generate code.
Architecture and DesignRun your code in a "jail" or similar sandbox environment that enforces strict boundaries between the process and the operating system. This may effectively restrict which code can be executed by your product. Examples include the Unix chroot jail and AppArmor. In general, managed code may provide some protection. This may not be a feasible solution, and it only limits the impact to the operating s…
ImplementationAssume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range…
TestingUse dynamic tools and techniques that interact with the product using large test suites with many diverse inputs, such as fuzz testing (fuzzing), robustness testing, and fault injection. The product's operation may slow down, but it should not become unstable, crash, or generate incorrect results.
OperationRun the code in an environment that performs automatic taint propagation and prevents any command execution that uses tainted variables, such as Perl's "-T" switch. This will force the program to perform validation steps that remove the taint, although you must be careful to correctly validate your inputs so that you do not accidentally mark dangerous inputs as untainted (see CWE-183 and CWE-184).
Examples (2)
This example attempts to write user messages to a message file and allow users to view them.
$MessageFile = "messages.out"; if ($_GET["action"] == "NewMessage") { $name = $_GET["name"]; $message = $_GET["message"]; $handle = fopen($MessageFile, "a+"); fwrite($handle, "<b>$name</b> says '$message'<hr>\n"); fclose($handle); echo "Message Saved!<p>\n"; } else if ($_GET["action"] == "ViewMessages") { include($MessageFile); }
Bad · PHP
name=h4x0r message=%3C?php%20system(%22/bin/ls%20-l%22);?%3E
Attack
edit-config.pl: This CGI script is used to modify settings in a configuration file.
use CGI qw(:standard); sub config_file_add_key { my ($fname, $key, $arg) = @_; # code to add a field/key to a file goes here } sub config_file_set_key { my ($fname, $key, $arg) = @_; # code to set key to a particular file goes here } sub config_file_delete_key { my ($fname, $key, $arg) = @_; # code to delete key from a particular file goes here } sub handleConfigAction { my ($fname, $action) = @_; my $key = param('key'); my $val = param('val'); # this is super-efficient code, especially if you have to invoke # any one of dozens of different functions! my $code = "config_file_$action_key(\$fnam
Bad · Perl
add_key(",","); system("/bin/ls");
Attack
CVE IDTitleCVSSSeverityPublished
CVE-2026-35093 Libinput: libinput: unauthorized code execution and information disclosure through lua bytecode plugins — Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 8.8 High2026-04-01
CVE-2026-29014 MetInfo CMS Unauthenticated PHP Code Injection RCE — MetInfo CMS 9.8 Critical2026-04-01
CVE-2026-35056 XenForo Remote Code Execution via Authenticated Admin — XenForo 7.2 High2026-04-01
CVE-2025-71281 XenForo Template Method Call Restriction Bypass — XenForo 8.8 High2026-04-01
CVE-2026-4800 lodash vulnerable to Code Injection via `_.template` imports key names — lodash 8.1 High2026-03-31
CVE-2026-34060 Ruby LSP has arbitrary code execution through branch setting — ruby-lsp 8.8AIHighAI2026-03-31
CVE-2026-3300 Everest Forms Pro <= 1.9.12 - Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution via Calculation Field — Everest Forms Pro 9.8 Critical2026-03-31
CVE-2026-4257 Contact Form by Supsystic <= 1.7.36 - Unauthenticated Server-Side Template Injection via Prefill Functionality — Contact Form by Supsystic 9.8 Critical2026-03-30
CVE-2026-28505 Tautulli: RCE via eval() sandbox bypass using lambda nested scope to escape co_names whitelist check — Tautulli 9.8 -2026-03-30
CVE-2026-5011 elecV2 elecV2P JSON webhook runJSFile code injection — elecV2P 6.3 Medium2026-03-28
CVE-2026-4998 Sinaptik AI PandasAI Chat Message code_executor.py CodeExecutor.execute code injection — PandasAI 7.3 High2026-03-28
CVE-2026-33943 Happy DOM ECMAScriptModuleCompiler: unsanitized export names are interpolated as executable code — happy-dom 8.8 High2026-03-27
CVE-2026-33940 Handlebars.js has JavaScript Injection via AST Type Confusion when passing an object as dynamic partial — handlebars.js 8.1 High2026-03-27
CVE-2026-33938 Handlebars.js has JavaScript Injection via AST Type Confusion by tampering @partial-block — handlebars.js 8.1 High2026-03-27
CVE-2026-33881 Windmill: Rogue Workspace Admins can inject code via unescaped workspace environment variable interpolation in NativeTS executor — windmill 4.8 -2026-03-27
CVE-2026-33873 Langflow has Authenticated Code Execution in Agentic Assistant Validation — langflow 8.8 -2026-03-27
CVE-2026-33654 Zero-Click Indirect Prompt Injection and Authentication Bypass via Email Polling — nanobot 10.0 -2026-03-27
CVE-2026-4963 huggingface smolagents Incomplete Fix CVE-2025-9959 local_python_executor.py evaluate_with code injection — smolagents 6.3 Medium2026-03-27
CVE-2025-15616 Wazuh Agent and Manager OS Command Injection and Untrusted Search Path — wazuh-agent 6.7 Medium2026-03-27
CVE-2026-32669 BUFFALO Wi-Fi router 代码注入漏洞 — BUFFALO Wi-Fi router products 9.8 -2026-03-27
CVE-2026-33744 BentoML has Dockerfile Command Injection via system_packages in bentofile.yaml — BentoML 7.8 High2026-03-27
CVE-2026-33622 A PinchTab Security Policy Bypass in /wait Allows Arbitrary JavaScript Execution — pinchtab 6.3 -2026-03-26
CVE-2026-33660 n8n Has Multiple Remote Code Execution Vulnerabilities in Merge Node AlaSQL SQL Mode — n8n 8.8 -2026-03-25
CVE-2026-32573 WordPress Nelio AB Testing plugin <= 8.2.7 - Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability — Nelio AB Testing 9.1 Critical2026-03-25
CVE-2026-32525 WordPress JetFormBuilder plugin <= 3.5.6.1 - Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability — JetFormBuilder 9.9 Critical2026-03-25
CVE-2026-27044 WordPress Total Poll Lite plugin <= 4.12.0 - Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability — Total Poll Lite 9.9 Critical2026-03-25
CVE-2026-25447 WordPress Widget Wrangler plugin <= 2.3.9 - Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability — Widget Wrangler 9.1 Critical2026-03-25
CVE-2026-25366 WordPress Woody ad snippets plugin <= 2.7.1 - Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability — Woody ad snippets 9.9 Critical2026-03-25
CVE-2026-25001 WordPress Post Snippets plugin <= 4.0.12 - Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability — Post Snippets 8.5 High2026-03-25
CVE-2026-33336 Vikunja Desktop vulnerable to Remote Code Execution via same-window navigation — vikunja 9.6 -2026-03-24

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-94 (对生成代码的控制不恰当(代码注入)) represent 1335 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.