Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1000 CNY

100.0%

CWE-94 (对生成代码的控制不恰当(代码注入)) — Vulnerability Class 1335

1335 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-94 (对生成代码的控制不恰当(代码注入)). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-94 represents a critical code injection weakness where software constructs executable code using untrusted input without proper sanitization. Attackers typically exploit this vulnerability by injecting malicious scripts or commands into user-supplied fields, such as web forms or API parameters, which the application then executes directly. This allows adversaries to bypass security controls, steal sensitive data, or gain unauthorized administrative access to the underlying system. To prevent such exploits, developers must rigorously validate and sanitize all external inputs, ensuring that only expected characters are processed. Implementing strict allow-listing strategies, utilizing parameterized queries for database interactions, and avoiding dynamic code execution functions like eval() are essential defensive measures. By treating all user input as potentially hostile and applying robust encoding techniques, organizations can effectively neutralize injection vectors and maintain application integrity.

MITRE CWE Description
The product constructs all or part of a code segment using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the syntax or behavior of the intended code segment.
Common Consequences (4)
Access ControlBypass Protection Mechanism
In some cases, injectable code controls authentication; this may lead to a remote vulnerability.
Access ControlGain Privileges or Assume Identity
Injected code can access resources that the attacker is directly prevented from accessing.
Integrity, Confidentiality, AvailabilityExecute Unauthorized Code or Commands
When a product allows a user's input to contain code syntax, it might be possible for an attacker to craft the code in such a way that it will alter the intended control flow of the product. As a result, code injection can often result in the execution of arbitrary code. Code injection attacks can…
Non-RepudiationHide Activities
Often the actions performed by injected control code are unlogged.
Mitigations (5)
Architecture and DesignRefactor your program so that you do not have to dynamically generate code.
Architecture and DesignRun your code in a "jail" or similar sandbox environment that enforces strict boundaries between the process and the operating system. This may effectively restrict which code can be executed by your product. Examples include the Unix chroot jail and AppArmor. In general, managed code may provide some protection. This may not be a feasible solution, and it only limits the impact to the operating s…
ImplementationAssume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range…
TestingUse dynamic tools and techniques that interact with the product using large test suites with many diverse inputs, such as fuzz testing (fuzzing), robustness testing, and fault injection. The product's operation may slow down, but it should not become unstable, crash, or generate incorrect results.
OperationRun the code in an environment that performs automatic taint propagation and prevents any command execution that uses tainted variables, such as Perl's "-T" switch. This will force the program to perform validation steps that remove the taint, although you must be careful to correctly validate your inputs so that you do not accidentally mark dangerous inputs as untainted (see CWE-183 and CWE-184).
Examples (2)
This example attempts to write user messages to a message file and allow users to view them.
$MessageFile = "messages.out"; if ($_GET["action"] == "NewMessage") { $name = $_GET["name"]; $message = $_GET["message"]; $handle = fopen($MessageFile, "a+"); fwrite($handle, "<b>$name</b> says '$message'<hr>\n"); fclose($handle); echo "Message Saved!<p>\n"; } else if ($_GET["action"] == "ViewMessages") { include($MessageFile); }
Bad · PHP
name=h4x0r message=%3C?php%20system(%22/bin/ls%20-l%22);?%3E
Attack
edit-config.pl: This CGI script is used to modify settings in a configuration file.
use CGI qw(:standard); sub config_file_add_key { my ($fname, $key, $arg) = @_; # code to add a field/key to a file goes here } sub config_file_set_key { my ($fname, $key, $arg) = @_; # code to set key to a particular file goes here } sub config_file_delete_key { my ($fname, $key, $arg) = @_; # code to delete key from a particular file goes here } sub handleConfigAction { my ($fname, $action) = @_; my $key = param('key'); my $val = param('val'); # this is super-efficient code, especially if you have to invoke # any one of dozens of different functions! my $code = "config_file_$action_key(\$fnam
Bad · Perl
add_key(",","); system("/bin/ls");
Attack
CVE IDTitleCVSSSeverityPublished
CVE-2026-33334 Vikunja Desktop: Any frontend XSS escalates to Remote Code Execution due to nodeIntegration — vikunja 9.0 -2026-03-24
CVE-2026-4745 Arbitrary Code Execution via Crafted Bytecode in dendibakh/perf-ninja — perf-ninja 9.8 -2026-03-24
CVE-2026-4681 Critical Remote Code Execution vulnerability reported in Windchill — Windchill PDMLink 9.8 -2026-03-23
CVE-2026-32276 Connect-CMS has Arbitrary Code Execution by an Authenticated User in its Code Study Plugin — connect-cms 8.8 High2026-03-23
CVE-2026-33479 AVideo has PHP Code Injection via eval() in Gallery saveSort.json.php Exploitable Through CSRF Against Admin — AVideo 8.8 High2026-03-23
CVE-2025-10679 ReviewX – WooCommerce Product Reviews with Multi-Criteria, Reminder Emails, Google Reviews, Schema & More <= 2.2.12 - Unauthenticated Limited Remote Code Execution — ReviewX – Multi-Criteria Reviews for WooCommerce with Google Reviews & Schema 7.3 High2026-03-23
CVE-2026-4564 yangzongzhuan RuoYi Quartz Job job code injection — RuoYi 4.7 Medium2026-03-22
CVE-2026-4515 Foundation Agents MetaGPT operator.py code_generate code injection — MetaGPT 6.3 Medium2026-03-21
CVE-2026-4004 Task Manager <= 3.0.2 - Authenticated (Subscriber+) Arbitrary Shortcode Execution via 'task_id' Parameter — Task Manager 6.5 Medium2026-03-21
CVE-2024-13785 Contact Form, Survey, Quiz & Popup Form Builder – ARForms <= 1.7.2 - Unauthenticated Blind Arbitrary Shortcode Execution — Contact Form, Survey, Quiz & Popup Form Builder – ARForms 5.6 Medium2026-03-21
CVE-2026-4506 Mindinventory MindSQL mindsql_core.py ask_db code injection — MindSQL 6.3 Medium2026-03-20
CVE-2026-3584 Kali Forms <= 2.4.9 - Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution via form_process — Kali Forms — Contact Form & Drag-and-Drop Builder 9.8 Critical2026-03-20
CVE-2026-33057 Mesop Affected by Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution via Test Suite Route /exec-py — mesop 9.8 Critical2026-03-20
CVE-2026-33017 Langflow has Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution via Public Flow Build Endpoint — langflow 9.8 -2026-03-20
CVE-2026-29103 SuiteCRM Vulnerable to Remote Code Execution via Module Loader Package Scanner Bypass — SuiteCRM 9.1 Critical2026-03-19
CVE-2026-29102 SuiteCRM has Authenticated RCE in Modules — SuiteCRM 7.2 High2026-03-19
CVE-2026-30875 Chamilo LMS: Authenticated RCE via H5P Import — chamilo-lms 8.8 High2026-03-16
CVE-2025-15540 Authenticated RCE in Raytha CMS — Raytha 7.2AIHighAI2026-03-16
CVE-2026-3476 Code Injection vulnerability affecting SOLIDWORKS Desktop from Release 2025 through Release 2026 — SOLIDWORKS Desktop 7.8 High2026-03-16
CVE-2025-14287 Command Injection in mlflow/mlflow — mlflow/mlflow 9.8 -2026-03-15
CVE-2026-26954 SandboxJS has a Sandbox Escape — SandboxJS 10.0 Critical2026-03-13
CVE-2026-32414 WordPress Advanced Woo Labels plugin <= 2.36 - Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability — Advanced Woo Labels 7.2 High2026-03-13
CVE-2026-32367 WordPress Modal Dialog plugin <= 3.5.16 - Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability — Modal Dialog 9.1 Critical2026-03-13
CVE-2026-32304 Locutus: RCE via unsanitized input in create_function() — locutus 9.8 Critical2026-03-12
CVE-2026-4039 OpenClaw Skill Env applySkillConfigenvOverrides code injection — OpenClaw 6.3 Medium2026-03-12
CVE-2026-3968 AutohomeCorp frostmourne Oracle Nashorn JavaScript ExpressionRule.java scriptEngine.eval code injection — frostmourne 6.3 Medium2026-03-12
CVE-2026-3955 elecV2P jsfile Endpoint wbjs.js runJSFile code injection — elecV2P 6.3 Medium2026-03-11
CVE-2019-25468 NetGain EM Plus 10.1.68 Remote Code Execution via script_test.jsp — NetGain EM Plus 9.8 Critical2026-03-11
CVE-2026-31857 CraftCMS has an RCE vulnerability via relational conditionals in the control panel — cms 8.8AIHighAI2026-03-11
CVE-2026-31861 Shell Command Injection in Git Routes [CloudCLI UI] — claudecodeui 8.8AIHighAI2026-03-11

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-94 (对生成代码的控制不恰当(代码注入)) represent 1335 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.