Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1000 CNY

100.0%

CWE-77 (在命令中使用的特殊元素转义处理不恰当(命令注入)) — Vulnerability Class 1185

1185 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-77 (在命令中使用的特殊元素转义处理不恰当(命令注入)). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-77 represents a critical input validation weakness where software constructs commands using untrusted data without properly sanitizing special characters. Attackers typically exploit this by injecting malicious payloads, such as semicolons or pipe operators, into user-supplied fields to alter the intended command structure. This allows them to execute arbitrary system commands, potentially leading to full system compromise, data exfiltration, or denial of service. To prevent such vulnerabilities, developers must strictly validate and sanitize all external inputs, ensuring that only expected data formats are processed. Utilizing parameterized APIs or safe command execution libraries instead of direct string concatenation significantly reduces risk. Additionally, implementing the principle of least privilege for application processes limits the potential impact of successful injection attempts, thereby enhancing overall system security against command injection attacks.

MITRE CWE Description
The product constructs all or part of a command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended command when it is sent to a downstream component. Many protocols and products have their own custom command language. While OS or shell command strings are frequently discovered and targeted, developers may not realize that these other command languages might also be vulnerable to attacks.
Common Consequences (1)
Integrity, Confidentiality, AvailabilityExecute Unauthorized Code or Commands
If a malicious user injects a character (such as a semi-colon) that delimits the end of one command and the beginning of another, it may be possible to then insert an entirely new and unrelated command that was not intended to be executed. This gives an attacker a privilege or capability that they w…
Mitigations (5)
Architecture and DesignIf at all possible, use library calls rather than external processes to recreate the desired functionality.
ImplementationIf possible, ensure that all external commands called from the program are statically created.
ImplementationAssume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range…
OperationRun time: Run time policy enforcement may be used in an allowlist fashion to prevent use of any non-sanctioned commands.
System ConfigurationAssign permissions that prevent the user from accessing/opening privileged files.
Examples (2)
Consider a "CWE Differentiator" application that uses an an LLM generative AI based "chatbot" to explain the difference between two weaknesses. As input, it accepts two CWE IDs, constructs a prompt string, sends the prompt to the chatbot, and prints the results. The prompt string effectively acts as a command to the chatbot component. Assume that invokeChatbot() calls the chatbot and returns the …
prompt = "Explain the difference between {} and {}".format(arg1, arg2) result = invokeChatbot(prompt) resultHTML = encodeForHTML(result) print resultHTML
Bad · Python
Explain the difference between CWE-77 and CWE-78
Informative
Consider the following program. It intends to perform an "ls -l" on an input filename. The validate_name() subroutine performs validation on the input to make sure that only alphanumeric and "-" characters are allowed, which avoids path traversal (CWE-22) and OS command injection (CWE-78) weaknesses. Only filenames like "abc" or "d-e-f" are intended to be allowed.
my $arg = GetArgument("filename"); do_listing($arg); sub do_listing { my($fname) = @_; if (! validate_name($fname)) { print "Error: name is not well-formed!\n"; return; } # build command my $cmd = "/bin/ls -l $fname"; system($cmd); } sub validate_name { my($name) = @_; if ($name =~ /^[\w\-]+$/) { return(1); } else { return(0); } }
Bad · Perl
if ($name =~ /^\w[\w\-]+$/) ...
Good · Perl
CVE IDTitleCVSSSeverityPublished
CVE-2021-3515 PostgreSQL 操作系统命令注入漏洞 — pglogical 6.7 -2021-06-01
CVE-2021-22899 Pulse Secure Pulse Connect Secure 命令注入漏洞 — Pulse Connect Secure 9.9 -2021-05-27
CVE-2019-25029 Versa Director 命令注入漏洞 — Versa Director 9.8 -2021-05-26
CVE-2021-1547 Cisco Small Business 100, 300, and 500 Series Wireless Access Points Command Injection Vulnerabilities — Cisco Business Wireless Access Point Software 4.7 Medium2021-05-22
CVE-2021-1548 Cisco Small Business 100, 300, and 500 Series Wireless Access Points Command Injection Vulnerabilities — Cisco Business Wireless Access Point Software 4.7 Medium2021-05-22
CVE-2021-1549 Cisco Small Business 100, 300, and 500 Series Wireless Access Points Command Injection Vulnerabilities — Cisco Business Wireless Access Point Software 4.7 Medium2021-05-22
CVE-2021-1555 Cisco Small Business 100, 300, and 500 Series Wireless Access Points Command Injection Vulnerabilities — Cisco Business Wireless Access Point Software 4.7 Medium2021-05-22
CVE-2021-1554 Cisco Small Business 100, 300, and 500 Series Wireless Access Points Command Injection Vulnerabilities — Cisco Business Wireless Access Point Software 4.7 Medium2021-05-22
CVE-2021-1553 Cisco Small Business 100, 300, and 500 Series Wireless Access Points Command Injection Vulnerabilities — Cisco Business Wireless Access Point Software 4.7 Medium2021-05-22
CVE-2021-1552 Cisco Small Business 100, 300, and 500 Series Wireless Access Points Command Injection Vulnerabilities — Cisco Business Wireless Access Point Software 4.7 Medium2021-05-22
CVE-2021-1551 Cisco Small Business 100, 300, and 500 Series Wireless Access Points Command Injection Vulnerabilities — Cisco Business Wireless Access Point Software 4.7 Medium2021-05-22
CVE-2021-1550 Cisco Small Business 100, 300, and 500 Series Wireless Access Points Command Injection Vulnerabilities — Cisco Business Wireless Access Point Software 4.7 Medium2021-05-22
CVE-2020-36198 Command Injection Vulnerability in Malware Remover — Malware Remover 6.7 Medium2021-05-13
CVE-2021-1488 Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance Software and Firepower Threat Defense Software for Firepower 1000 and 2100 Series Appliances Command Injection Vulnerability — Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software 6.7 Medium2021-04-29
CVE-2021-0253 Junos OS: NFX Series: Local Command Execution Vulnerability in JDMD Leads to Privilege Escalation — Junos OS 7.8 High2021-04-22
CVE-2021-0252 Junos OS: NFX Series: Local Code Execution Vulnerability in JDMD Leads to Privilege Escalation — Junos OS 7.8 High2021-04-22
CVE-2020-2509 Command Injection Vulnerability in QTS and QuTS hero — QTS 9.8 -2021-04-17
CVE-2020-27227 OpenClinic GA 操作系统命令注入漏洞 — OpenClinic 9.8 -2021-04-13
CVE-2021-1382 Cisco IOS XE SD-WAN Software Command Injection Vulnerability — Cisco IOS XE Software 6.0 Medium2021-03-24
CVE-2021-1384 Cisco IOx for IOS XE Software Command Injection Vulnerability — Cisco IOS XE Software 6.5 Medium2021-03-24
CVE-2021-1443 Cisco IOS XE Software Web UI OS Command Injection Vulnerability — Cisco IOS XE Software 5.5 Medium2021-03-24
CVE-2021-22864 Unsafe configuration options in GitHub Pages leading to remote code execution on GitHub Enterprise Server — GitHub Enterprise Server 8.8 -2021-03-23
CVE-2020-8298 fs-path 命令注入漏洞 — fs-path 9.8 -2021-03-04
CVE-2020-10519 Unsafe configuration options in GitHub Pages leading to remote code execution on GitHub Enterprise Server — GitHub Enterprise Server 8.8 -2021-03-03
CVE-2020-27867 多款Netgear产品命令注入漏洞 — Multiple Routers 8.0 -2021-02-11
CVE-2020-27864 D-Link DAP-1860和TCP 命令注入漏洞 — DAP-1860 8.8 -2021-02-11
CVE-2020-27862 D-Link DVA-2800 and DSL-2888A 命令注入漏洞 — Multiple Routers 8.8 -2021-02-11
CVE-2020-2507 command injection vulnerability in Helpdesk — Helpdesk 9.8 Critical2021-02-03
CVE-2020-8101 Command execution due to unsanitized input in LifeShield DIY HD Video Doorbell — LifeShield DIY HD Video Doorbell 6.9 Medium2021-02-02
CVE-2020-2508 Command Injection Vulnerability in QTS and QuTS hero — QTS 7.2 High2021-01-11

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-77 (在命令中使用的特殊元素转义处理不恰当(命令注入)) represent 1185 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.