Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1000 CNY

100.0%

CWE-77 (在命令中使用的特殊元素转义处理不恰当(命令注入)) — Vulnerability Class 1185

1185 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-77 (在命令中使用的特殊元素转义处理不恰当(命令注入)). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-77 represents a critical input validation weakness where software constructs commands using untrusted data without properly sanitizing special characters. Attackers typically exploit this by injecting malicious payloads, such as semicolons or pipe operators, into user-supplied fields to alter the intended command structure. This allows them to execute arbitrary system commands, potentially leading to full system compromise, data exfiltration, or denial of service. To prevent such vulnerabilities, developers must strictly validate and sanitize all external inputs, ensuring that only expected data formats are processed. Utilizing parameterized APIs or safe command execution libraries instead of direct string concatenation significantly reduces risk. Additionally, implementing the principle of least privilege for application processes limits the potential impact of successful injection attempts, thereby enhancing overall system security against command injection attacks.

MITRE CWE Description
The product constructs all or part of a command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended command when it is sent to a downstream component. Many protocols and products have their own custom command language. While OS or shell command strings are frequently discovered and targeted, developers may not realize that these other command languages might also be vulnerable to attacks.
Common Consequences (1)
Integrity, Confidentiality, AvailabilityExecute Unauthorized Code or Commands
If a malicious user injects a character (such as a semi-colon) that delimits the end of one command and the beginning of another, it may be possible to then insert an entirely new and unrelated command that was not intended to be executed. This gives an attacker a privilege or capability that they w…
Mitigations (5)
Architecture and DesignIf at all possible, use library calls rather than external processes to recreate the desired functionality.
ImplementationIf possible, ensure that all external commands called from the program are statically created.
ImplementationAssume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range…
OperationRun time: Run time policy enforcement may be used in an allowlist fashion to prevent use of any non-sanctioned commands.
System ConfigurationAssign permissions that prevent the user from accessing/opening privileged files.
Examples (2)
Consider a "CWE Differentiator" application that uses an an LLM generative AI based "chatbot" to explain the difference between two weaknesses. As input, it accepts two CWE IDs, constructs a prompt string, sends the prompt to the chatbot, and prints the results. The prompt string effectively acts as a command to the chatbot component. Assume that invokeChatbot() calls the chatbot and returns the …
prompt = "Explain the difference between {} and {}".format(arg1, arg2) result = invokeChatbot(prompt) resultHTML = encodeForHTML(result) print resultHTML
Bad · Python
Explain the difference between CWE-77 and CWE-78
Informative
Consider the following program. It intends to perform an "ls -l" on an input filename. The validate_name() subroutine performs validation on the input to make sure that only alphanumeric and "-" characters are allowed, which avoids path traversal (CWE-22) and OS command injection (CWE-78) weaknesses. Only filenames like "abc" or "d-e-f" are intended to be allowed.
my $arg = GetArgument("filename"); do_listing($arg); sub do_listing { my($fname) = @_; if (! validate_name($fname)) { print "Error: name is not well-formed!\n"; return; } # build command my $cmd = "/bin/ls -l $fname"; system($cmd); } sub validate_name { my($name) = @_; if ($name =~ /^[\w\-]+$/) { return(1); } else { return(0); } }
Bad · Perl
if ($name =~ /^\w[\w\-]+$/) ...
Good · Perl
CVE IDTitleCVSSSeverityPublished
CVE-2020-11073 Remote Code Execution in Autoswitch Python Virtualenv — zsh-autoswitch-virtualenv 7.9 High2020-05-13
CVE-2019-5623 Accellion File Transfer Appliance Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command ('Command Injection') — File Transfer Appliance 9.8 -2020-04-29
CVE-2019-16011 Cisco IOS XE SD-WAN Software Command Injection Vulnerability — Cisco IOS XE SD-WAN Software 7.8 -2020-04-29
CVE-2019-17101 Command execution due to unsanitized input in Netatmo Smart Indoor Security Camera — Smart Indoor Camera 5.7 Medium2020-04-23
CVE-2019-14868 ksh 命令注入漏洞 — ksh 7.4 High2020-04-02
CVE-2019-16012 Cisco SD-WAN Solution vManage SQL Injection Vulnerability — Cisco vManage Software 8.1 -2020-03-19
CVE-2020-3266 Cisco SD-WAN Solution Command Injection Vulnerability — Cisco SD-WAN Solution 7.8 -2020-03-19
CVE-2020-1980 PAN-OS: Shell injection vulnerability in PAN-OS CLI allows execution of shell commands — PAN-OS 7.8 High2020-03-11
CVE-2020-3176 Cisco Remote PHY Device Software Command Injection Vulnerability — Cisco Remote PHY 6.7 -2020-03-04
CVE-2019-15609 kill-port-process package 操作系统命令注入漏洞 — kill-port-process 9.8 -2020-02-28
CVE-2019-16005 Cisco Webex Video Mesh Node Command Injection Vulnerability — Cisco Webex Video Mesh 7.2 -2020-01-26
CVE-2019-12629 Cisco SD-WAN vManage Command Injection Vulnerability — Cisco SD-WAN Solution 8.8 -2020-01-26
CVE-2019-17148 Corel Parallels Desktop 命令注入漏洞 — Desktop 7.8 -2020-01-07
CVE-2019-15575 GitLab 注入漏洞 — GitLab CE/EE 9.8 -2019-12-18
CVE-2019-15595 Ubiquiti Networks UniFi Video Controller 安全漏洞 — UniFi Video Server 7.4 -2019-11-25
CVE-2019-15588 Sonatype Nexus Repository Manager 操作系统命令注入漏洞 — Nexus Repository Manager 7.2 -2019-11-01
CVE-2019-11279 Privilege Escalation via Scope Manipulation in UAA — UAA Release (OSS) 8.8 -2019-09-26
CVE-2019-11278 Privilege Escalation via Blind SCIM Injection in UAA — UAA Release (OSS) 8.8 -2019-09-26
CVE-2019-12661 Cisco IOS XE Software Virtualization Manager CLI Command Injection Vulnerability — Cisco IOS XE Software 6.7 -2019-09-25
CVE-2019-12651 Cisco IOS XE Software Web UI Command Injection Vulnerabilities — Cisco IOS XE Software 3.2.11aSG 8.8 -2019-09-25
CVE-2019-12650 Cisco IOS XE Software Web UI Command Injection Vulnerabilities — Cisco IOS XE Software 3.2.11aSG 8.8 -2019-09-25
CVE-2019-13552 研华 Advantech WebAccess 命令注入漏洞 — WebAccess 8.8 -2019-09-18
CVE-2019-12805 NC Launcher 2 Arbitrary Command Injection Vulnerability — NC Launcher2 8.8 -2019-08-09
CVE-2019-1923 Cisco Small Business SPA500 Series IP Phones Local Command Execution Vulnerability — Cisco SPA525G2 5-line IP Phone 6.6 -2019-07-17
CVE-2019-5446 Ubiquiti Networks EdgeMAX EdgeSwitch 命令注入漏洞 — EdgeMAX 7.2 -2019-07-10
CVE-2019-1893 Cisco Enterprise NFV Infrastructure Software Command Injection Vulnerability — Cisco Enterprise NFV Infrastructure Software 7.8 -2019-07-06
CVE-2019-1624 Cisco SD-WAN Solution Command Injection Vulnerability — Cisco SD-WAN Solution 8.8 -2019-06-20
CVE-2019-1623 Cisco Meeting Server CLI Command Injection Vulnerability — Cisco Meeting Server 6.7 -2019-06-20
CVE-2019-1780 Cisco FXOS and NX-OS Software Command Injection Vulnerability — Cisco NX-OS Software 6.7 -2019-05-16
CVE-2019-1791 Cisco NX-OS Software Command Injection Vulnerability — Cisco NX-OS Software 6.7 -2019-05-15

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-77 (在命令中使用的特殊元素转义处理不恰当(命令注入)) represent 1185 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.