Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1000 CNY

100.0%

CWE-77 (在命令中使用的特殊元素转义处理不恰当(命令注入)) — Vulnerability Class 1183

1183 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-77 (在命令中使用的特殊元素转义处理不恰当(命令注入)). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-77 represents a critical input validation weakness where software constructs commands using untrusted data without properly sanitizing special characters. Attackers typically exploit this by injecting malicious payloads, such as semicolons or pipe operators, into user-supplied fields to alter the intended command structure. This allows them to execute arbitrary system commands, potentially leading to full system compromise, data exfiltration, or denial of service. To prevent such vulnerabilities, developers must strictly validate and sanitize all external inputs, ensuring that only expected data formats are processed. Utilizing parameterized APIs or safe command execution libraries instead of direct string concatenation significantly reduces risk. Additionally, implementing the principle of least privilege for application processes limits the potential impact of successful injection attempts, thereby enhancing overall system security against command injection attacks.

MITRE CWE Description
The product constructs all or part of a command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended command when it is sent to a downstream component. Many protocols and products have their own custom command language. While OS or shell command strings are frequently discovered and targeted, developers may not realize that these other command languages might also be vulnerable to attacks.
Common Consequences (1)
Integrity, Confidentiality, AvailabilityExecute Unauthorized Code or Commands
If a malicious user injects a character (such as a semi-colon) that delimits the end of one command and the beginning of another, it may be possible to then insert an entirely new and unrelated command that was not intended to be executed. This gives an attacker a privilege or capability that they w…
Mitigations (5)
Architecture and DesignIf at all possible, use library calls rather than external processes to recreate the desired functionality.
ImplementationIf possible, ensure that all external commands called from the program are statically created.
ImplementationAssume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range…
OperationRun time: Run time policy enforcement may be used in an allowlist fashion to prevent use of any non-sanctioned commands.
System ConfigurationAssign permissions that prevent the user from accessing/opening privileged files.
Examples (2)
Consider a "CWE Differentiator" application that uses an an LLM generative AI based "chatbot" to explain the difference between two weaknesses. As input, it accepts two CWE IDs, constructs a prompt string, sends the prompt to the chatbot, and prints the results. The prompt string effectively acts as a command to the chatbot component. Assume that invokeChatbot() calls the chatbot and returns the …
prompt = "Explain the difference between {} and {}".format(arg1, arg2) result = invokeChatbot(prompt) resultHTML = encodeForHTML(result) print resultHTML
Bad · Python
Explain the difference between CWE-77 and CWE-78
Informative
Consider the following program. It intends to perform an "ls -l" on an input filename. The validate_name() subroutine performs validation on the input to make sure that only alphanumeric and "-" characters are allowed, which avoids path traversal (CWE-22) and OS command injection (CWE-78) weaknesses. Only filenames like "abc" or "d-e-f" are intended to be allowed.
my $arg = GetArgument("filename"); do_listing($arg); sub do_listing { my($fname) = @_; if (! validate_name($fname)) { print "Error: name is not well-formed!\n"; return; } # build command my $cmd = "/bin/ls -l $fname"; system($cmd); } sub validate_name { my($name) = @_; if ($name =~ /^[\w\-]+$/) { return(1); } else { return(0); } }
Bad · Perl
if ($name =~ /^\w[\w\-]+$/) ...
Good · Perl
CVE IDTitleCVSSSeverityPublished
CVE-2018-0431 Cisco Integrated Management Controller Command Injection Vulnerability — Cisco Unified Computing System E-Series Software (UCSE) 8.8 -2018-10-05
CVE-2018-0433 Cisco SD-WAN Solution Command Injection Vulnerability — Cisco SD-WAN Solution 7.8 -2018-10-05
CVE-2018-0454 Cisco Cloud Services Platform 2100 Command Injection Vulnerability — Cisco Cloud Services Platform 2100 8.8 -2018-10-05
CVE-2018-0477 Cisco IOS XE Software Command Injection Vulnerabilities — Cisco IOS XE Software 6.7 -2018-10-05
CVE-2018-0481 Cisco IOS XE Software Command Injection Vulnerabilities — Cisco IOS XE Software 6.7 -2018-10-05
CVE-2018-16460 Joyent Node.js ps package 命令注入漏洞 — ps 9.8 -2018-09-07
CVE-2018-3786 egg-scripts 命令注入漏洞 — egg-scripts 9.8 -2018-08-24
CVE-2018-0427 Cisco Digital Network Architecture Center 命令注入漏洞 — Digital Network Architecture (DNA) Center 8.8 -2018-08-15
CVE-2018-3779 active-support ruby gem 安全漏洞 — active-support ruby gem 9.8 -2018-08-10
CVE-2018-9866 SonicWall Global Management System 安全漏洞 — Global Management System (GMS) 9.8 -2018-08-03
CVE-2016-8628 Ansible 命令注入漏洞 — Ansible 9.1 -2018-07-31
CVE-2018-3772 whereis npm模块安全漏洞 — whereis 9.8 -2018-07-30
CVE-2018-0344 Cisco SD-WAN Solution 命令注入漏洞 — Cisco SD-WAN Solution unknown 8.8 -2018-07-18
CVE-2018-0347 Cisco SD-WAN Solution Zero Touch Provisioning子系统命令注入漏洞 — Cisco SD-WAN Solution unknown 7.8 -2018-07-18
CVE-2018-0348 Cisco SD-WAN Solution 命令注入漏洞 — Cisco SD-WAN Solution unknown 8.8 -2018-07-18
CVE-2018-0350 Cisco SD-WAN Solution 命令注入漏洞 — Cisco SD-WAN Solution unknown 8.8 -2018-07-18
CVE-2018-0351 Cisco SD-WAN Solution 命令注入漏洞 — Cisco SD-WAN Solution unknown 7.8 -2018-07-18
CVE-2018-0341 Cisco IP Phone 6800、7800和8800系列命令注入漏洞 — Cisco IP Phone 6800, 7800, and 8800 unknown 8.8 -2018-07-16
CVE-2016-6558 The ASUS RP-AC52 access point, firmware version 1.0.1.1s and possibly earlier, is vulnerable to command injection — RP-AC52 Access Point 9.8 -2018-07-13
CVE-2018-12465 Remote Code Execution in Micro Focus Secure Messaging Gateway — Secure Messaging Gateway 7.2 -2018-06-29
CVE-2011-4182 shell code injection via ESSID because of missing escaping of a variable — sysconfig 9.8 -2018-06-12
CVE-2017-12075 Synology DiskStation Manager EZ-Internet 命令注入漏洞 — DiskStation Manager (DSM) 8.8 -2018-06-08
CVE-2017-12078 Synology Router Manager EZ-Internet 命令注入漏洞 — Synology Router Manager (SRM) 8.8 -2018-06-08
CVE-2018-3746 pdfinfojs NPM模块命令注入漏洞 — pdfinfojs 9.8 -2018-06-01
CVE-2018-1111 Red Hat Enterprise Linux 命令注入漏洞 — dhcp 7.5 -2018-05-17
CVE-2018-0324 Cisco Enterprise NFV Infrastructure Software CLI 命令注入漏洞 — Cisco Enterprise NFV Infrastructure Software 6.7 -2018-05-17
CVE-2017-0915 GitLab Community Edition 安全漏洞 — GitLab Community and Enterprise Editions 8.8 -2018-03-21
CVE-2017-0916 GitLab Community Edition 安全漏洞 — GitLab Community and Enterprise Editions 9.8 -2018-03-21
CVE-2018-0217 Cisco ASR 5000 Series Aggregation Services Routers StarOS操作系统CLI 命令注入漏洞 — Cisco StarOS 6.7 -2018-03-08
CVE-2018-0224 Cisco ASR 5000 Series Aggregation Services Routers StarOS操作系统命令注入漏洞 — Cisco StarOS 6.7 -2018-03-08

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-77 (在命令中使用的特殊元素转义处理不恰当(命令注入)) represent 1183 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.