Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1000 CNY

100.0%

CWE-77 (在命令中使用的特殊元素转义处理不恰当(命令注入)) — Vulnerability Class 1185

1185 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-77 (在命令中使用的特殊元素转义处理不恰当(命令注入)). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-77 represents a critical input validation weakness where software constructs commands using untrusted data without properly sanitizing special characters. Attackers typically exploit this by injecting malicious payloads, such as semicolons or pipe operators, into user-supplied fields to alter the intended command structure. This allows them to execute arbitrary system commands, potentially leading to full system compromise, data exfiltration, or denial of service. To prevent such vulnerabilities, developers must strictly validate and sanitize all external inputs, ensuring that only expected data formats are processed. Utilizing parameterized APIs or safe command execution libraries instead of direct string concatenation significantly reduces risk. Additionally, implementing the principle of least privilege for application processes limits the potential impact of successful injection attempts, thereby enhancing overall system security against command injection attacks.

MITRE CWE Description
The product constructs all or part of a command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended command when it is sent to a downstream component. Many protocols and products have their own custom command language. While OS or shell command strings are frequently discovered and targeted, developers may not realize that these other command languages might also be vulnerable to attacks.
Common Consequences (1)
Integrity, Confidentiality, AvailabilityExecute Unauthorized Code or Commands
If a malicious user injects a character (such as a semi-colon) that delimits the end of one command and the beginning of another, it may be possible to then insert an entirely new and unrelated command that was not intended to be executed. This gives an attacker a privilege or capability that they w…
Mitigations (5)
Architecture and DesignIf at all possible, use library calls rather than external processes to recreate the desired functionality.
ImplementationIf possible, ensure that all external commands called from the program are statically created.
ImplementationAssume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range…
OperationRun time: Run time policy enforcement may be used in an allowlist fashion to prevent use of any non-sanctioned commands.
System ConfigurationAssign permissions that prevent the user from accessing/opening privileged files.
Examples (2)
Consider a "CWE Differentiator" application that uses an an LLM generative AI based "chatbot" to explain the difference between two weaknesses. As input, it accepts two CWE IDs, constructs a prompt string, sends the prompt to the chatbot, and prints the results. The prompt string effectively acts as a command to the chatbot component. Assume that invokeChatbot() calls the chatbot and returns the …
prompt = "Explain the difference between {} and {}".format(arg1, arg2) result = invokeChatbot(prompt) resultHTML = encodeForHTML(result) print resultHTML
Bad · Python
Explain the difference between CWE-77 and CWE-78
Informative
Consider the following program. It intends to perform an "ls -l" on an input filename. The validate_name() subroutine performs validation on the input to make sure that only alphanumeric and "-" characters are allowed, which avoids path traversal (CWE-22) and OS command injection (CWE-78) weaknesses. Only filenames like "abc" or "d-e-f" are intended to be allowed.
my $arg = GetArgument("filename"); do_listing($arg); sub do_listing { my($fname) = @_; if (! validate_name($fname)) { print "Error: name is not well-formed!\n"; return; } # build command my $cmd = "/bin/ls -l $fname"; system($cmd); } sub validate_name { my($name) = @_; if ($name =~ /^[\w\-]+$/) { return(1); } else { return(0); } }
Bad · Perl
if ($name =~ /^\w[\w\-]+$/) ...
Good · Perl
CVE IDTitleCVSSSeverityPublished
CVE-2021-4045 TP-LINK Tapo C200 remote code execution vulnerability — Tapo C200 9.8 Critical2022-03-07
CVE-2021-41599 Improper control flow in GitHub Enterprise Server hosted Pages leads to remote code execution — GitHub Enterprise Server 8.8 -2022-02-17
CVE-2021-43589 DELL Dell EMC Unity 操作系统操作系统命令注入漏洞 — Unity 6.0 Medium2022-01-24
CVE-2021-38542 Apache James vulnerable to STARTTLS command injection (IMAP and POP3) — Apache James 5.9 -2022-01-04
CVE-2021-3621 SSSD 操作系统命令注入漏洞 — sssd 8.8 -2021-12-23
CVE-2021-27447 Mesa Labs AmegaView command injection — AmegaView 10.0 Critical2021-12-21
CVE-2021-27449 Mesa Labs AmegaView Command Injection — AmegaView 9.9 Critical2021-12-21
CVE-2021-42132 Ivanti Avalanche 命令注入漏洞 — Ivanti Avalanche 8.8 -2021-12-07
CVE-2021-42129 Ivanti Avalanche 命令注入漏洞 — Ivanti Avalanche 8.8 -2021-12-07
CVE-2021-41146 Arbitrary command execution on Windows in qutebrowser — qutebrowser 8.8 High2021-10-21
CVE-2021-31358 Junos OS Evolved: shell-injection vulnerabilities in evo_sftp UI wrapper script — Junos OS Evolved 7.8 High2021-10-19
CVE-2021-31357 Junos OS Evolved: shell-injection vulnerabilities in evo_tcpdump UI wrapper script — Junos OS Evolved 7.8 High2021-10-19
CVE-2021-31356 Junos OS Evolved: Multiple shell-injection vulnerabilities in EVO UI wrapper scripts — Junos OS Evolved 7.8 High2021-10-19
CVE-2021-34748 Cisco Intersight Virtual Appliance Command Injection Vulnerability — Cisco Intersight Virtual Appliance 8.8 High2021-10-06
CVE-2021-41116 Command injection in composer on Windows — composer 8.2 High2021-10-05
CVE-2021-22868 Unsafe configuration options in GitHub Pages leading to path traversal on GitHub Enterprise Server — GitHub Enterprise Server 6.5 -2021-09-24
CVE-2021-34729 Cisco IOS XE SD-WAN Software Command Injection Vulnerability — Cisco IOS XE SD-WAN Software 6.7 Medium2021-09-23
CVE-2021-34726 Cisco SD-WAN Software Command Injection Vulnerability — Cisco SD-WAN Solution 6.7 -2021-09-23
CVE-2021-34725 Cisco IOS XE SD-WAN Software Command Injection Vulnerability — Cisco IOS XE SD-WAN Software 6.7 Medium2021-09-23
CVE-2020-26300 Command injection in systeminformation — systeminformation 5.9 Medium2021-09-09
CVE-2021-21595 DELL EMC PowerScale 命令注入漏洞 — PowerScale OneFS 6.0 Medium2021-08-16
CVE-2021-37708 Command injection in mail agent settings — platform 8.8 High2021-08-16
CVE-2021-22935 Pulse Secure Pulse Connect Secure 命令注入漏洞 — Pulse Connect Secure 7.2 -2021-08-16
CVE-2021-22938 Pulse Secure Pulse Connect Secure 命令注入漏洞 — Pulse Connect Secure 7.2 -2021-08-16
CVE-2021-21406 Command Injection vulnerability in the Setup Wizard — iTop 5.8 Medium2021-07-21
CVE-2021-22867 Unsafe configuration options in GitHub Pages leading to path traversal on GitHub Enterprise Server — GitHub Enterprise Server 6.5 -2021-07-14
CVE-2021-32529 QSAN XEVO, SANOS - Command Injection -1 — XEVO 9.8 Critical2021-07-07
CVE-2021-34809 Synology Download Station 命令注入漏洞 — Download Station 9.9 Critical2021-06-18
CVE-2021-32661 TechDocs object element script injection — backstage 6.8 Medium2021-06-03
CVE-2021-32660 TechDocs content sanitization bypass — backstage 6.8 Medium2021-06-03

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-77 (在命令中使用的特殊元素转义处理不恰当(命令注入)) represent 1185 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.