Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1000 CNY

100.0%

CWE-77 (在命令中使用的特殊元素转义处理不恰当(命令注入)) — Vulnerability Class 1185

1185 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-77 (在命令中使用的特殊元素转义处理不恰当(命令注入)). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-77 represents a critical input validation weakness where software constructs commands using untrusted data without properly sanitizing special characters. Attackers typically exploit this by injecting malicious payloads, such as semicolons or pipe operators, into user-supplied fields to alter the intended command structure. This allows them to execute arbitrary system commands, potentially leading to full system compromise, data exfiltration, or denial of service. To prevent such vulnerabilities, developers must strictly validate and sanitize all external inputs, ensuring that only expected data formats are processed. Utilizing parameterized APIs or safe command execution libraries instead of direct string concatenation significantly reduces risk. Additionally, implementing the principle of least privilege for application processes limits the potential impact of successful injection attempts, thereby enhancing overall system security against command injection attacks.

MITRE CWE Description
The product constructs all or part of a command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended command when it is sent to a downstream component. Many protocols and products have their own custom command language. While OS or shell command strings are frequently discovered and targeted, developers may not realize that these other command languages might also be vulnerable to attacks.
Common Consequences (1)
Integrity, Confidentiality, AvailabilityExecute Unauthorized Code or Commands
If a malicious user injects a character (such as a semi-colon) that delimits the end of one command and the beginning of another, it may be possible to then insert an entirely new and unrelated command that was not intended to be executed. This gives an attacker a privilege or capability that they w…
Mitigations (5)
Architecture and DesignIf at all possible, use library calls rather than external processes to recreate the desired functionality.
ImplementationIf possible, ensure that all external commands called from the program are statically created.
ImplementationAssume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range…
OperationRun time: Run time policy enforcement may be used in an allowlist fashion to prevent use of any non-sanctioned commands.
System ConfigurationAssign permissions that prevent the user from accessing/opening privileged files.
Examples (2)
Consider a "CWE Differentiator" application that uses an an LLM generative AI based "chatbot" to explain the difference between two weaknesses. As input, it accepts two CWE IDs, constructs a prompt string, sends the prompt to the chatbot, and prints the results. The prompt string effectively acts as a command to the chatbot component. Assume that invokeChatbot() calls the chatbot and returns the …
prompt = "Explain the difference between {} and {}".format(arg1, arg2) result = invokeChatbot(prompt) resultHTML = encodeForHTML(result) print resultHTML
Bad · Python
Explain the difference between CWE-77 and CWE-78
Informative
Consider the following program. It intends to perform an "ls -l" on an input filename. The validate_name() subroutine performs validation on the input to make sure that only alphanumeric and "-" characters are allowed, which avoids path traversal (CWE-22) and OS command injection (CWE-78) weaknesses. Only filenames like "abc" or "d-e-f" are intended to be allowed.
my $arg = GetArgument("filename"); do_listing($arg); sub do_listing { my($fname) = @_; if (! validate_name($fname)) { print "Error: name is not well-formed!\n"; return; } # build command my $cmd = "/bin/ls -l $fname"; system($cmd); } sub validate_name { my($name) = @_; if ($name =~ /^[\w\-]+$/) { return(1); } else { return(0); } }
Bad · Perl
if ($name =~ /^\w[\w\-]+$/) ...
Good · Perl
CVE IDTitleCVSSSeverityPublished
CVE-2022-21941 iSTAR Ultra — iSTAR Ultra 10.0 Critical2022-08-31
CVE-2022-2234 mySCADA myPRO Command Injection — mySCADA myPRO 9.9 Critical2022-08-24
CVE-2022-35954 Delimiter injection vulnerability in @actions/core exportVariable — toolkit 5.0 Medium2022-08-13
CVE-2022-34660 Siemens Teamcenter 命令注入漏洞 — Teamcenter V12.4 9.1 -2022-08-10
CVE-2022-2323 SonicWALL Switch 命令注入漏洞 — SonicWall Switch 8.8 -2022-07-29
CVE-2016-4991 NodePDF 命令注入漏洞 — nodepdf 9.8 -2022-07-28
CVE-2022-2143 Advantech iView — iView 9.8 Critical2022-07-22
CVE-2022-31161 Roxy-WI Vulnerable to Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution via ssl_cert Upload — roxy-wi 10.0 Critical2022-07-15
CVE-2022-34820 多款Siemens SIMATIC产品命令注入漏洞 — SIMATIC CP 1242-7 V2 8.4 High2022-07-12
CVE-2022-29560 Siemens RUGGEDCOM ROX 系列命令注入漏洞 — RUGGEDCOM ROX MX5000 5.5 -2022-07-12
CVE-2022-32262 Siemens SINEMA Remote Connect Server命令注入漏洞 — SINEMA Remote Connect Server 8.8 High2022-06-14
CVE-2020-36529 SevOne Network Management System Traceroute traceroute.php command injection — Network Management System 8.8 High2022-06-03
CVE-2022-29256 Possible vulnerability at 'npm install' time in sharp if an attacker has control over build environment — sharp 6.5 Medium2022-05-25
CVE-2022-29184 Command Injection/Argument Injection in GoCD — gocd 8.8 High2022-05-20
CVE-2022-26085 InHand Networks InRouter Series 操作系统命令注入漏洞 — InRouter302 8.8 -2022-05-12
CVE-2022-26042 InHand Networks InRouter Series 操作系统命令注入漏洞 — InRouter302 8.8 -2022-05-12
CVE-2022-26007 InHand Networks InRouter302操作系统命令注入漏洞 — InRouter302 7.2 -2022-05-12
CVE-2022-27588 Vulnerability in QVR — QVR 9.8 Critical2022-05-05
CVE-2021-44051 Command injection — QuTScloud 8.8 High2022-05-05
CVE-2022-27806 F5 BIG-IP多款产品命令注入漏洞 — BIG-IP (Advanced WAF, APM, ASM) 8.7 High2022-05-05
CVE-2022-26415 F5 BIG-IP 命令注入漏洞 — BIG-IP 7.7 High2022-05-05
CVE-2022-20799 Cisco Small Business RV Series Routers Command Injection Vulnerabilities — Cisco Small Business RV Series Router Firmware 4.7 Medium2022-05-04
CVE-2022-20801 Cisco Small Business RV Series Routers Command Injection Vulnerabilities — Cisco Small Business RV Series Router Firmware 4.7 Medium2022-05-04
CVE-2022-1509 Command Injection Vulnerability in hestiacp/hestiacp — hestiacp/hestiacp 9.9 Critical2022-04-28
CVE-2021-34592 Bender Charge Controller: Command injection via Web interface — CC612 8.8 High2022-04-27
CVE-2022-0999 mySCADA myPRO Command Injection — myPRO 8.8 High2022-04-11
CVE-2022-20665 Cisco StarOS Command Injection Vulnerability — Cisco ASR 5000 Series Software 6.0 Medium2022-04-06
CVE-2021-32933 MDT AutoSave Command Injection — MDT AutoSave 10.0 Critical2022-04-01
CVE-2022-25619 Authenticated Command Injection to RCE — SambaBox 3.8 Low2022-03-30
CVE-2022-22688 Synology DiskStation Manager命令注入漏洞 — DiskStation Manager (DSM) 8.8 High2022-03-25

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-77 (在命令中使用的特殊元素转义处理不恰当(命令注入)) represent 1185 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.