Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1000 CNY

100.0%

CWE-77 (在命令中使用的特殊元素转义处理不恰当(命令注入)) — Vulnerability Class 1185

1185 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-77 (在命令中使用的特殊元素转义处理不恰当(命令注入)). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-77 represents a critical input validation weakness where software constructs commands using untrusted data without properly sanitizing special characters. Attackers typically exploit this by injecting malicious payloads, such as semicolons or pipe operators, into user-supplied fields to alter the intended command structure. This allows them to execute arbitrary system commands, potentially leading to full system compromise, data exfiltration, or denial of service. To prevent such vulnerabilities, developers must strictly validate and sanitize all external inputs, ensuring that only expected data formats are processed. Utilizing parameterized APIs or safe command execution libraries instead of direct string concatenation significantly reduces risk. Additionally, implementing the principle of least privilege for application processes limits the potential impact of successful injection attempts, thereby enhancing overall system security against command injection attacks.

MITRE CWE Description
The product constructs all or part of a command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended command when it is sent to a downstream component. Many protocols and products have their own custom command language. While OS or shell command strings are frequently discovered and targeted, developers may not realize that these other command languages might also be vulnerable to attacks.
Common Consequences (1)
Integrity, Confidentiality, AvailabilityExecute Unauthorized Code or Commands
If a malicious user injects a character (such as a semi-colon) that delimits the end of one command and the beginning of another, it may be possible to then insert an entirely new and unrelated command that was not intended to be executed. This gives an attacker a privilege or capability that they w…
Mitigations (5)
Architecture and DesignIf at all possible, use library calls rather than external processes to recreate the desired functionality.
ImplementationIf possible, ensure that all external commands called from the program are statically created.
ImplementationAssume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range…
OperationRun time: Run time policy enforcement may be used in an allowlist fashion to prevent use of any non-sanctioned commands.
System ConfigurationAssign permissions that prevent the user from accessing/opening privileged files.
Examples (2)
Consider a "CWE Differentiator" application that uses an an LLM generative AI based "chatbot" to explain the difference between two weaknesses. As input, it accepts two CWE IDs, constructs a prompt string, sends the prompt to the chatbot, and prints the results. The prompt string effectively acts as a command to the chatbot component. Assume that invokeChatbot() calls the chatbot and returns the …
prompt = "Explain the difference between {} and {}".format(arg1, arg2) result = invokeChatbot(prompt) resultHTML = encodeForHTML(result) print resultHTML
Bad · Python
Explain the difference between CWE-77 and CWE-78
Informative
Consider the following program. It intends to perform an "ls -l" on an input filename. The validate_name() subroutine performs validation on the input to make sure that only alphanumeric and "-" characters are allowed, which avoids path traversal (CWE-22) and OS command injection (CWE-78) weaknesses. Only filenames like "abc" or "d-e-f" are intended to be allowed.
my $arg = GetArgument("filename"); do_listing($arg); sub do_listing { my($fname) = @_; if (! validate_name($fname)) { print "Error: name is not well-formed!\n"; return; } # build command my $cmd = "/bin/ls -l $fname"; system($cmd); } sub validate_name { my($name) = @_; if ($name =~ /^[\w\-]+$/) { return(1); } else { return(0); } }
Bad · Perl
if ($name =~ /^\w[\w\-]+$/) ...
Good · Perl
CVE IDTitleCVSSSeverityPublished
CVE-2025-53773 GitHub Copilot and Visual Studio Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Microsoft Visual Studio 2022 version 17.14 7.8 High2025-08-12
CVE-2025-8752 wangzhixuan spring-shiro-training add command injection — spring-shiro-training 7.3 High2025-08-09
CVE-2025-53787 Microsoft 365 Copilot BizChat Information Disclosure Vulnerability — Microsoft 365 Copilot's Business Chat 8.2 High2025-08-07
CVE-2025-53774 Microsoft 365 Copilot BizChat Information Disclosure Vulnerability — Microsoft 365 Copilot's Business Chat 6.5 Medium2025-08-07
CVE-2025-7769 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command ('Command Injection') in Tigo Energy Cloud Connect Advanced — Cloud Connect Advanced 9.8AICriticalAI2025-08-06
CVE-2025-54782 @nestjs/devtools-integration's CSRF to Sandbox Escape Allows for RCE against JS Developers — nest 9.6 -2025-08-01
CVE-2025-54131 Cursor bypasses its allow list to execute arbitrary commands — cursor 6.4 Medium2025-08-01
CVE-2025-54424 1Panel Agent Bypasses Certificate Verification Leading to Arbitrary Command Execution — 1Panel 8.1 High2025-08-01
CVE-2025-54416 tj-actions/branch-names Contains Command Injection Vulnerability — branch-names 9.1 Critical2025-07-26
CVE-2025-54377 Roo Code Lacks Line Break Validation in its Command Execution Tool — Roo-Code 7.8 High2025-07-23
CVE-2025-7952 TOTOLINK T6 MQTT Packet wireless.so ckeckKeepAlive command injection — T6 6.3 Medium2025-07-22
CVE-2025-53832 @translated/lara-mcp vulnerable to command injection in import_tmx tool — lara-mcp 7.5 High2025-07-21
CVE-2025-7932 D-Link DIR‑817L ssdpcgi lxmldbc_system command injection — DIR‑817L 6.3 Medium2025-07-21
CVE-2025-7883 Eluktronics Control Center Powershell Script Command command injection — Control Center 7.8 High2025-07-20
CVE-2025-7836 D-Link DIR-816L Environment Variable cgibin lxmldbc_system command injection — DIR-816L 6.3 Medium2025-07-19
CVE-2025-54073 mcp-package-docs vulnerable to command injection in several tools — mcp-package-docs 7.5 High2025-07-18
CVE-2025-52690 Command Injection Vulnerability in the OmniAccess Stellar over UDP Service — OmniAccess Stellar Products 8.1 High2025-07-16
CVE-2025-52688 Command Injection Vulnerability in the OmniAccess Stellar Web Management Interface — OmniAccess Stellar Products 9.8 Critical2025-07-16
CVE-2025-52687 JavaScript Injection Vulnerability in the OmniAccess Stellar Web Management Interface — OmniAccess Stellar 2.4 Low2025-07-16
CVE-2025-49836 GHSL-2025-048: GPT-SoVITS Command Injection vulnerability — GPT-SoVITS 9.8AICriticalAI2025-07-15
CVE-2025-49835 GHSL-2025-047: GPT-SoVITS Command Injection vulnerability — GPT-SoVITS 9.8AICriticalAI2025-07-15
CVE-2025-49834 GHSL-2025-046: GPT-SoVITS Command Injection vulnerability — GPT-SoVITS 9.8AICriticalAI2025-07-15
CVE-2025-49833 GHSL-2025-045: GPT-SoVITS Command Injection vulnerability — GPT-SoVITS 9.8AICriticalAI2025-07-15
CVE-2025-3621 Remote Code Execution in ProTNS ActADUR — ActADUR 9.6 Critical2025-07-15
CVE-2025-7615 TOTOLINK T6 HTTP POST Request cstecgi.cgi clearPairCfg command injection — T6 6.3 Medium2025-07-14
CVE-2025-7614 TOTOLINK T6 HTTP POST Request cstecgi.cgi delDevice command injection — T6 6.3 Medium2025-07-14
CVE-2025-7613 TOTOLINK T6 HTTP POST Request cstecgi.cgi CloudSrvVersionCheck command injection — T6 6.3 Medium2025-07-14
CVE-2025-7578 Teledyne FLIR FB-Series O/FLIR FH-Series ID runcmd.sh sendCommand command injection — FLIR FB-Series O 5.0 Medium2025-07-14
CVE-2025-7525 TOTOLINK T6 HTTP POST Request cstecgi.cgi setTracerouteCfg command injection — T6 6.3 Medium2025-07-13
CVE-2025-7524 TOTOLINK T6 HTTP POST Request cstecgi.cgi setDiagnosisCfg command injection — T6 6.3 Medium2025-07-13

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-77 (在命令中使用的特殊元素转义处理不恰当(命令注入)) represent 1185 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.