Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1000 CNY

100.0%

CWE-77 (在命令中使用的特殊元素转义处理不恰当(命令注入)) — Vulnerability Class 1185

1185 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-77 (在命令中使用的特殊元素转义处理不恰当(命令注入)). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-77 represents a critical input validation weakness where software constructs commands using untrusted data without properly sanitizing special characters. Attackers typically exploit this by injecting malicious payloads, such as semicolons or pipe operators, into user-supplied fields to alter the intended command structure. This allows them to execute arbitrary system commands, potentially leading to full system compromise, data exfiltration, or denial of service. To prevent such vulnerabilities, developers must strictly validate and sanitize all external inputs, ensuring that only expected data formats are processed. Utilizing parameterized APIs or safe command execution libraries instead of direct string concatenation significantly reduces risk. Additionally, implementing the principle of least privilege for application processes limits the potential impact of successful injection attempts, thereby enhancing overall system security against command injection attacks.

MITRE CWE Description
The product constructs all or part of a command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended command when it is sent to a downstream component. Many protocols and products have their own custom command language. While OS or shell command strings are frequently discovered and targeted, developers may not realize that these other command languages might also be vulnerable to attacks.
Common Consequences (1)
Integrity, Confidentiality, AvailabilityExecute Unauthorized Code or Commands
If a malicious user injects a character (such as a semi-colon) that delimits the end of one command and the beginning of another, it may be possible to then insert an entirely new and unrelated command that was not intended to be executed. This gives an attacker a privilege or capability that they w…
Mitigations (5)
Architecture and DesignIf at all possible, use library calls rather than external processes to recreate the desired functionality.
ImplementationIf possible, ensure that all external commands called from the program are statically created.
ImplementationAssume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range…
OperationRun time: Run time policy enforcement may be used in an allowlist fashion to prevent use of any non-sanctioned commands.
System ConfigurationAssign permissions that prevent the user from accessing/opening privileged files.
Examples (2)
Consider a "CWE Differentiator" application that uses an an LLM generative AI based "chatbot" to explain the difference between two weaknesses. As input, it accepts two CWE IDs, constructs a prompt string, sends the prompt to the chatbot, and prints the results. The prompt string effectively acts as a command to the chatbot component. Assume that invokeChatbot() calls the chatbot and returns the …
prompt = "Explain the difference between {} and {}".format(arg1, arg2) result = invokeChatbot(prompt) resultHTML = encodeForHTML(result) print resultHTML
Bad · Python
Explain the difference between CWE-77 and CWE-78
Informative
Consider the following program. It intends to perform an "ls -l" on an input filename. The validate_name() subroutine performs validation on the input to make sure that only alphanumeric and "-" characters are allowed, which avoids path traversal (CWE-22) and OS command injection (CWE-78) weaknesses. Only filenames like "abc" or "d-e-f" are intended to be allowed.
my $arg = GetArgument("filename"); do_listing($arg); sub do_listing { my($fname) = @_; if (! validate_name($fname)) { print "Error: name is not well-formed!\n"; return; } # build command my $cmd = "/bin/ls -l $fname"; system($cmd); } sub validate_name { my($name) = @_; if ($name =~ /^[\w\-]+$/) { return(1); } else { return(0); } }
Bad · Perl
if ($name =~ /^\w[\w\-]+$/) ...
Good · Perl
CVE IDTitleCVSSSeverityPublished
CVE-2025-5438 Linksys RE6500/RE6250/RE6300/RE6350/RE7000/RE9000 WPS command injection — RE6500 6.3 Medium2025-06-02
CVE-2025-5113 Authenticated Remote Command Injection in Diviotec NBR IP Cameras — nbr222p 9.8AICriticalAI2025-06-02
CVE-2025-4010 Arbitrary Command Injection in Netcom NTC-6200 & NWL-222 — NTC 6200 8.8AIHighAI2025-06-02
CVE-2025-48492 GetSimple CMS RCE in Edit component — GetSimpleCMS-CE 8.8AIHighAI2025-05-30
CVE-2025-4009 Unauthenticated Arbitrary Command Injection in Evertz SDVN — 3080ipx-10G 9.8AICriticalAI2025-05-28
CVE-2025-5147 Netcore NBR1005GPEV2/NBR200V2/B6V2 network_tools tools_ping command injection — NBR1005GPEV2 6.3 Medium2025-05-25
CVE-2025-5146 Netcore NBR200V2 HTTP Header routerd passwd_set command injection — NBR1005GPEV2 6.3 Medium2025-05-25
CVE-2025-5145 Netcore POWER13 Query String cgi-bin command injection — NBR1005GPEV2 6.3 Medium2025-05-25
CVE-2025-5139 Qualitor Office 365-type Connection testaConexaoOffice365.php command injection — Qualitor 5.6 Medium2025-05-25
CVE-2025-5126 Teledyne FLIR AX8 settingsregional.php setDataTime command injection — AX8 8.8 High2025-05-24
CVE-2025-20258 Cisco Duo 命令注入漏洞 — Cisco Duo 5.4 Medium2025-05-21
CVE-2025-4008 Arbitrary Command Injection in Smartbedded MeteoBridge — MeteoBridge 9.8AICriticalAI2025-05-21
CVE-2025-5000 Linksys FGW3000-AH/FGW3000-HK HTTP POST Request sysconf.cgi control_panel_sw command injection — FGW3000-AH 6.3 Medium2025-05-20
CVE-2025-4999 Linksys FGW3000-AH/FGW3000-HK HTTP POST Request sysconf.cgi sub_4153FC command injection — FGW3000-AH 6.3 Medium2025-05-20
CVE-2025-4851 TOTOLINK N300RH cstecgi.cgi setUploadUserData command injection — N300RH 6.3 Medium2025-05-18
CVE-2025-4850 TOTOLINK N300RH cstecgi.cgi setUnloadUserData command injection — N300RH 6.3 Medium2025-05-18
CVE-2025-4849 TOTOLINK N300RH cstecgi.cgi CloudACMunualUpdateUserdata command injection — N300RH 6.3 Medium2025-05-18
CVE-2025-4747 Bohua NetDragon Firewall ip_status.php command injection — NetDragon Firewall 6.3 Medium2025-05-16
CVE-2025-4729 TOTOLINK A3002R/A3002RU HTTP POST Request formMapDelDevice command injection — A3002R 6.3 Medium2025-05-15
CVE-2025-32702 Visual Studio Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Microsoft Visual Studio 2019 version 16.11 (includes 16.0 - 16.10) 7.8 High2025-05-13
CVE-2024-12442 Command injection in EnerSys AMPA versions 24.04 through 24.16, inclusive — AMPA 9.8AICriticalAI2025-05-09
CVE-2024-11861 Command injection in EnerSys AMPA 22.09 and prior versions — AMPA 7.2AIHighAI2025-05-09
CVE-2025-4454 D-Link DIR-619L wake_on_lan command injection — DIR-619L 6.3 Medium2025-05-09
CVE-2025-4453 D-Link DIR-619L formSysCmd command injection — DIR-619L 6.3 Medium2025-05-09
CVE-2025-4445 D-Link DIR-605L wake_on_lan command injection — DIR-605L 6.3 Medium2025-05-09
CVE-2025-4443 D-Link DIR-605L sub_454F2C command injection — DIR-605L 6.3 Medium2025-05-08
CVE-2025-31644 Appliance mode BIG-IP iControl REST and tmsh vulnerability — BIG-IP 8.7 High2025-05-07
CVE-2025-46735 Terraform WinDNS Provider improperly sanitizes input variables in `windns_record` — terraform-provider-windns 8.8AIHighAI2025-05-06
CVE-2025-22476 Dell Storage Manager 命令注入漏洞 — Dell Storage Center - Dell Storage Manager 5.5 Medium2025-05-06
CVE-2025-4357 Tenda RX3 telnet command injection — RX3 4.7 Medium2025-05-06

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-77 (在命令中使用的特殊元素转义处理不恰当(命令注入)) represent 1185 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.