Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1000 CNY

100.0%

CWE-77 (在命令中使用的特殊元素转义处理不恰当(命令注入)) — Vulnerability Class 1185

1185 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-77 (在命令中使用的特殊元素转义处理不恰当(命令注入)). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-77 represents a critical input validation weakness where software constructs commands using untrusted data without properly sanitizing special characters. Attackers typically exploit this by injecting malicious payloads, such as semicolons or pipe operators, into user-supplied fields to alter the intended command structure. This allows them to execute arbitrary system commands, potentially leading to full system compromise, data exfiltration, or denial of service. To prevent such vulnerabilities, developers must strictly validate and sanitize all external inputs, ensuring that only expected data formats are processed. Utilizing parameterized APIs or safe command execution libraries instead of direct string concatenation significantly reduces risk. Additionally, implementing the principle of least privilege for application processes limits the potential impact of successful injection attempts, thereby enhancing overall system security against command injection attacks.

MITRE CWE Description
The product constructs all or part of a command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended command when it is sent to a downstream component. Many protocols and products have their own custom command language. While OS or shell command strings are frequently discovered and targeted, developers may not realize that these other command languages might also be vulnerable to attacks.
Common Consequences (1)
Integrity, Confidentiality, AvailabilityExecute Unauthorized Code or Commands
If a malicious user injects a character (such as a semi-colon) that delimits the end of one command and the beginning of another, it may be possible to then insert an entirely new and unrelated command that was not intended to be executed. This gives an attacker a privilege or capability that they w…
Mitigations (5)
Architecture and DesignIf at all possible, use library calls rather than external processes to recreate the desired functionality.
ImplementationIf possible, ensure that all external commands called from the program are statically created.
ImplementationAssume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range…
OperationRun time: Run time policy enforcement may be used in an allowlist fashion to prevent use of any non-sanctioned commands.
System ConfigurationAssign permissions that prevent the user from accessing/opening privileged files.
Examples (2)
Consider a "CWE Differentiator" application that uses an an LLM generative AI based "chatbot" to explain the difference between two weaknesses. As input, it accepts two CWE IDs, constructs a prompt string, sends the prompt to the chatbot, and prints the results. The prompt string effectively acts as a command to the chatbot component. Assume that invokeChatbot() calls the chatbot and returns the …
prompt = "Explain the difference between {} and {}".format(arg1, arg2) result = invokeChatbot(prompt) resultHTML = encodeForHTML(result) print resultHTML
Bad · Python
Explain the difference between CWE-77 and CWE-78
Informative
Consider the following program. It intends to perform an "ls -l" on an input filename. The validate_name() subroutine performs validation on the input to make sure that only alphanumeric and "-" characters are allowed, which avoids path traversal (CWE-22) and OS command injection (CWE-78) weaknesses. Only filenames like "abc" or "d-e-f" are intended to be allowed.
my $arg = GetArgument("filename"); do_listing($arg); sub do_listing { my($fname) = @_; if (! validate_name($fname)) { print "Error: name is not well-formed!\n"; return; } # build command my $cmd = "/bin/ls -l $fname"; system($cmd); } sub validate_name { my($name) = @_; if ($name =~ /^[\w\-]+$/) { return(1); } else { return(0); } }
Bad · Perl
if ($name =~ /^\w[\w\-]+$/) ...
Good · Perl
CVE IDTitleCVSSSeverityPublished
CVE-2025-11045 WAYOS LQ_04/LQ_05/LQ_06/LQ_07/LQ_09 usb_paswd.asp command injection — LQ_04 7.3 High2025-09-26
CVE-2025-10964 Wavlink NU516U1 firewall.cgi sub_401B30 command injection — NU516U1 6.3 Medium2025-09-25
CVE-2025-59817 Authenticated Remote Code Execution in zForm_auto_config — TCIS-3+ 8.4 High2025-09-25
CVE-2025-59815 Authenticated Remote Code Execution in the Billing Administration portal — ICX500 8.4 High2025-09-25
CVE-2025-10963 Wavlink NU516U1 firewall.cgi sub_4016F0 command injection — NU516U1 6.3 Medium2025-09-25
CVE-2025-10962 Wavlink NU516U1 SetName wireless.cgi sub_403198 command injection — NU516U1 6.3 Medium2025-09-25
CVE-2025-10961 Wavlink NU516U1 Delete_Mac_list wireless.cgi sub_4030C0 command injection — NU516U1 5.5 Medium2025-09-25
CVE-2025-10960 Wavlink NU516U1 DeleteMac wireless.cgi sub_402D1C command injection — NU516U1 6.3 Medium2025-09-25
CVE-2025-10959 Wavlink NU516U1 firewall.cgi sub_401778 command injection — NU516U1 6.3 Medium2025-09-25
CVE-2025-10958 Wavlink NU516U1 AddMac wireless.cgi sub_403010 command injection — NU516U1 6.3 Medium2025-09-25
CVE-2025-59834 Command Injection in adb-mcp MCP Server — adb-mcp 9.8 Critical2025-09-25
CVE-2025-59831 `git-comiters` Command Injection vulnerability — git-commiters.js 8.8AIHighAI2025-09-25
CVE-2025-20334 Cisco IOS XE 命令注入漏洞 — Cisco IOS XE Software 8.8 High2025-09-24
CVE-2025-10814 D-Link DIR-823X goahead command injection — DIR-823X 6.3 Medium2025-09-22
CVE-2025-59689 Libraesva Email Security Gateway 安全漏洞 — Email Security Gateway 6.1 Medium2025-09-19
CVE-2025-10035 Deserialization Vulnerability in GoAnywhere MFT's License Servlet — GoAnywhere MFT 10.0 Critical2025-09-18
CVE-2025-10689 D-Link DIR-645 soap.cgi soapcgi_main command injection — DIR-645 6.3 Medium2025-09-18
CVE-2025-10634 D-Link DIR-823X Environment Variable goahead sub_412E7C command injection — DIR-823X 6.3 Medium2025-09-18
CVE-2025-10629 D-Link DIR-852 Simple Service Discovery Protocol Service cgibin ssdpcgi_main command injection — DIR-852 6.3 Medium2025-09-18
CVE-2025-10628 D-Link DIR-852 Web Management hedwig.cgi command injection — DIR-852 6.3 Medium2025-09-18
CVE-2025-59458 JetBrains Junie 命令注入漏洞 — Junie 8.3 High2025-09-17
CVE-2025-59376 mcp-kubernetes-server 安全漏洞 — mcp-kubernetes-server 3.7 Low2025-09-15
CVE-2025-10401 D-Link DIR-823x diag_ping command injection — DIR-823x 6.3 Medium2025-09-14
CVE-2025-10325 Wavlink WL-WN578W2 login.cgi sub_401BA4 command injection — WL-WN578W2 6.3 Medium2025-09-12
CVE-2025-10324 Wavlink WL-WN578W2 firewall.cgi sub_401C5C command injection — WL-WN578W2 7.3 High2025-09-12
CVE-2025-10323 Wavlink WL-WN578W2 wizard_rep.shtml sub_409184 command injection — WL-WN578W2 7.3 High2025-09-12
CVE-2025-10364 Unauthenticated Arbitrary Command Injection in Evertz SDVN — 3080ipx-10G 9.8 -2025-09-12
CVE-2025-27233 Zabbix Agent 2 smartctl plugin argument injection in Zabbix 6.0 and later. — Zabbix 6.5 -2025-09-12
CVE-2025-55319 Agentic AI and Visual Studio Code Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Visual Studio Code 8.8 High2025-09-12
CVE-2025-59046 interactive-git-checkout has Command Injection vulnerability — interactive-git-checkout 9.8 Critical2025-09-09

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-77 (在命令中使用的特殊元素转义处理不恰当(命令注入)) represent 1185 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.