Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1000 CNY

100.0%

CWE-77 (在命令中使用的特殊元素转义处理不恰当(命令注入)) — Vulnerability Class 1185

1185 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-77 (在命令中使用的特殊元素转义处理不恰当(命令注入)). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-77 represents a critical input validation weakness where software constructs commands using untrusted data without properly sanitizing special characters. Attackers typically exploit this by injecting malicious payloads, such as semicolons or pipe operators, into user-supplied fields to alter the intended command structure. This allows them to execute arbitrary system commands, potentially leading to full system compromise, data exfiltration, or denial of service. To prevent such vulnerabilities, developers must strictly validate and sanitize all external inputs, ensuring that only expected data formats are processed. Utilizing parameterized APIs or safe command execution libraries instead of direct string concatenation significantly reduces risk. Additionally, implementing the principle of least privilege for application processes limits the potential impact of successful injection attempts, thereby enhancing overall system security against command injection attacks.

MITRE CWE Description
The product constructs all or part of a command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended command when it is sent to a downstream component. Many protocols and products have their own custom command language. While OS or shell command strings are frequently discovered and targeted, developers may not realize that these other command languages might also be vulnerable to attacks.
Common Consequences (1)
Integrity, Confidentiality, AvailabilityExecute Unauthorized Code or Commands
If a malicious user injects a character (such as a semi-colon) that delimits the end of one command and the beginning of another, it may be possible to then insert an entirely new and unrelated command that was not intended to be executed. This gives an attacker a privilege or capability that they w…
Mitigations (5)
Architecture and DesignIf at all possible, use library calls rather than external processes to recreate the desired functionality.
ImplementationIf possible, ensure that all external commands called from the program are statically created.
ImplementationAssume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range…
OperationRun time: Run time policy enforcement may be used in an allowlist fashion to prevent use of any non-sanctioned commands.
System ConfigurationAssign permissions that prevent the user from accessing/opening privileged files.
Examples (2)
Consider a "CWE Differentiator" application that uses an an LLM generative AI based "chatbot" to explain the difference between two weaknesses. As input, it accepts two CWE IDs, constructs a prompt string, sends the prompt to the chatbot, and prints the results. The prompt string effectively acts as a command to the chatbot component. Assume that invokeChatbot() calls the chatbot and returns the …
prompt = "Explain the difference between {} and {}".format(arg1, arg2) result = invokeChatbot(prompt) resultHTML = encodeForHTML(result) print resultHTML
Bad · Python
Explain the difference between CWE-77 and CWE-78
Informative
Consider the following program. It intends to perform an "ls -l" on an input filename. The validate_name() subroutine performs validation on the input to make sure that only alphanumeric and "-" characters are allowed, which avoids path traversal (CWE-22) and OS command injection (CWE-78) weaknesses. Only filenames like "abc" or "d-e-f" are intended to be allowed.
my $arg = GetArgument("filename"); do_listing($arg); sub do_listing { my($fname) = @_; if (! validate_name($fname)) { print "Error: name is not well-formed!\n"; return; } # build command my $cmd = "/bin/ls -l $fname"; system($cmd); } sub validate_name { my($name) = @_; if ($name =~ /^[\w\-]+$/) { return(1); } else { return(0); } }
Bad · Perl
if ($name =~ /^\w[\w\-]+$/) ...
Good · Perl
CVE IDTitleCVSSSeverityPublished
CVE-2025-59286 Copilot Information Disclosure Vulnerability — Microsoft 365 Copilot's Business Chat 9.3 Critical2025-10-09
CVE-2025-59272 Copilot Information Disclosure Vulnerability — Microsoft 365 Copilot's Business Chat 9.3 Critical2025-10-09
CVE-2025-59252 M365 Copilot Information Disclosure Vulnerability — Microsoft 365 Word Copilot 9.3 Critical2025-10-09
CVE-2025-11523 Tenda AC7 AdvSetLanip command injection — AC7 6.3 Medium2025-10-09
CVE-2025-11488 D-Link DIR-852 HNAP1 command injection — DIR-852 7.3 High2025-10-08
CVE-2025-61787 Deno is Vulnerable to Command Injection on Windows During Batch File Execution — deno 8.1 High2025-10-08
CVE-2025-11335 D-Link DI-7100G C1 jhttpd msp_info.htm sub_46409C command injection — DI-7100G C1 4.7 Medium2025-10-06
CVE-2025-11331 IdeaCMS Website Name Config.php command injection — IdeaCMS 4.7 Medium2025-10-06
CVE-2025-11303 Belkin F9K1015 mp command injection — F9K1015 6.3 Medium2025-10-05
CVE-2025-11298 Belkin F9K1015 formSetWanStatic command injection — F9K1015 6.3 Medium2025-10-05
CVE-2025-11292 Belkin F9K1015 formBSSetSitesurvey command injection — F9K1015 6.3 Medium2025-10-05
CVE-2025-59741 Multiple vulnerabilities in AndSoft's e-TMS — e-TMS 8.8 -2025-10-02
CVE-2025-59740 Multiple vulnerabilities in AndSoft's e-TMS — e-TMS 9.8 -2025-10-02
CVE-2025-59739 Multiple vulnerabilities in AndSoft's e-TMS — e-TMS 8.8 -2025-10-02
CVE-2025-59738 Multiple vulnerabilities in AndSoft's e-TMS — e-TMS 9.8 -2025-10-02
CVE-2025-59737 Multiple vulnerabilities in AndSoft's e-TMS — e-TMS 9.8 -2025-10-02
CVE-2025-59736 Multiple vulnerabilities in AndSoft's e-TMS — e-TMS 9.8 -2025-10-02
CVE-2025-59735 Multiple vulnerabilities in AndSoft's e-TMS — e-TMS 9.8 -2025-10-02
CVE-2025-59337 Discourse: Cross-Site Data Exposure via Backup Restore Metacommand Injection in Multisite Deployments — discourse 8.1AIHighAI2025-10-01
CVE-2025-61584 serverless-dns is vulnerable to Command Injection through pr.yml GitHub Action Workflow — serverless-dns 9.8AICriticalAI2025-09-30
CVE-2025-41250 Header injection vulnerability — vCenter 8.5 High2025-09-29
CVE-2025-11121 Tenda AC18 AdvSetLanip command injection — AC18 6.3 Medium2025-09-28
CVE-2025-11100 D-Link DIR-823X set_wifi_blacklists uci_set command injection — DIR-823X 6.3 Medium2025-09-28
CVE-2025-11099 D-Link DIR-823X delete_prohibiting uci_del command injection — DIR-823X 6.3 Medium2025-09-28
CVE-2025-11098 D-Link DIR-823X set_wifi_blacklists command injection — DIR-823X 6.3 Medium2025-09-28
CVE-2025-11097 D-Link DIR-823X set_device_name command injection — DIR-823X 6.3 Medium2025-09-28
CVE-2025-11096 D-Link DIR-823X diag_traceroute command injection — DIR-823X 6.3 Medium2025-09-28
CVE-2025-11095 D-Link DIR-823X delete_offline_device command injection — DIR-823X 6.3 Medium2025-09-28
CVE-2025-11092 D-Link DIR-823X set_switch_settings sub_412E7C command injection — DIR-823X 6.3 Medium2025-09-28
CVE-2025-11073 Keyfactor RG-EW5100BE HTTP POST Request cmd command injection — RG-EW5100BE 4.7 Medium2025-09-27

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-77 (在命令中使用的特殊元素转义处理不恰当(命令注入)) represent 1185 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.