Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1000 CNY

100.0%

CWE-120 (未进行输入大小检查的缓冲区拷贝(传统缓冲区溢出)) — Vulnerability Class 1767

1767 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-120 (未进行输入大小检查的缓冲区拷贝(传统缓冲区溢出)). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-120 represents a critical memory safety vulnerability where software copies data into a fixed-size buffer without validating the input’s length against the destination’s capacity. This classic buffer overflow occurs when an attacker supplies input exceeding the allocated memory space, causing data to spill into adjacent memory regions. Exploitation typically involves injecting malicious code or altering program control flow, such as overwriting return addresses to execute arbitrary commands. Developers prevent this weakness by implementing rigorous bounds checking before any copy operation, ensuring the input size never exceeds the buffer’s limits. Utilizing safer, language-specific functions that automatically handle size verification, or adopting modern programming languages with built-in memory safety features, effectively mitigates this risk and preserves application integrity against memory corruption attacks.

MITRE CWE Description
The product copies an input buffer to an output buffer without verifying that the size of the input buffer is less than the size of the output buffer.
Common Consequences (2)
Integrity, Confidentiality, AvailabilityModify Memory, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands
Buffer overflows often can be used to execute arbitrary code, which is usually outside the scope of the product's implicit security policy. This can often be used to subvert any other security service.
AvailabilityModify Memory, DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU)
Buffer overflows generally lead to crashes. Other attacks leading to lack of availability are possible, including putting the product into an infinite loop.
Mitigations (5)
RequirementsUse a language that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, many languages that perform their own memory management, such as Java and Perl, are not subject to buffer overflows. Other languages, such as Ada and C#, typically provide overflow protection, but the protection can be disabled by the programmer. Be wary that a lan…
Architecture and DesignUse a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. Examples include the Safe C String Library (SafeStr) by Messier and Viega [REF-57], and the Strsafe.h library from Microsoft [REF-56]. These libraries provide safer versions of overflow-prone string-handling functions.
Operation, Build and CompilationUse automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index checking. D3-SFCV (Stack Frame Canary Validation) from D3FEND [REF-1334] discusses…
Effectiveness: Defense in Depth
ImplementationConsider adhering to the following rules when allocating and managing an application's memory: Double check that your buffer is as large as you specify. When using functions that accept a number of bytes to copy, such as strncpy(), be aware that if the destination buffer size is equal to the source buffer size, it may not NULL-terminate the string. Check buffer boundaries if accessing the buffer i…
ImplementationAssume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range…
Examples (2)
The following code asks the user to enter their last name and then attempts to store the value entered in the last_name array.
char last_name[20]; printf ("Enter your last name: "); scanf ("%s", last_name);
Bad · C
The following code attempts to create a local copy of a buffer to perform some manipulations to the data.
void manipulate_string(char * string){ char buf[24]; strcpy(buf, string); ... }
Bad · C
CVE IDTitleCVSSSeverityPublished
CVE-2025-13305 D-Link DWR-M920/DWR-M921/DWR-M960/DIR-822K/DIR-825M formTracerouteDiagnosticRun buffer overflow — DWR-M920 8.8 High2025-11-17
CVE-2025-32089 Dell ControlVault3 CvManager_SBI buffer overflow vulnerability — BCM5820X 8.8 High2025-11-17
CVE-2025-13304 D-Link DWR-M920/DWR-M921/DWR-M960/DWR-M961/DIR-825M formPingDiagnosticRun buffer overflow — DWR-M920 8.8 High2025-11-17
CVE-2025-36553 Dell ControlVault3 CvManager buffer overflow vulnerability — BCM5820X 8.8 High2025-11-17
CVE-2025-13288 Tenda CH22 PPTPUserSetting fromPptpUserSetting buffer overflow — CH22 8.8 High2025-11-17
CVE-2025-13258 Tenda AC20 WifiExtraSet buffer overflow — AC20 8.8 High2025-11-17
CVE-2018-25125 Netis DL4322D RTK 2.1.1 FTP Service DoS — DL4322D 6.5 -2025-11-14
CVE-2025-40815 Siemens多款产品 安全漏洞 — LOGO! 12/24RCE 7.2 High2025-11-11
CVE-2025-64182 OpenEXR has buffer overflow in PyOpenEXR_old's channels() and channel() — openexr 7.8 -2025-11-10
CVE-2025-12622 Tenda AC10 SysRunCmd formSysRunCmd buffer overflow — AC10 8.8 High2025-11-03
CVE-2025-12619 Tenda A15 openNetworkGateway fromSetWirelessRepeat buffer overflow — A15 8.8 High2025-11-03
CVE-2025-12618 Tenda AC8 DatabaseIniSet buffer overflow — AC8 8.8 High2025-11-03
CVE-2025-12611 Tenda AC21 SetPptpServerCfg formSetPPTPServer buffer overflow — AC21 8.8 High2025-11-03
CVE-2025-12596 Tenda AC23 saveParentControlInfo buffer overflow — AC23 8.8 High2025-11-02
CVE-2025-12595 Tenda AC23 SetVirtualServerCfg formSetVirtualSer buffer overflow — AC23 8.8 High2025-11-02
CVE-2025-12142 BSS(Block Started by Symbol) Memory Corruption Vulnerability — Terra AC wallbox 6.1 Medium2025-10-29
CVE-2025-33131 Fixes to common vulnerabilities found in IBM Db2 High Performance Unload — DB2 High Performance Unload 6.5 Medium2025-10-27
CVE-2025-12322 Tenda CH22 NatStaticSetting fromNatStaticSetting buffer overflow — CH22 8.8 High2025-10-27
CVE-2025-12274 Tenda CH22 P2pListFilter fromP2pListFilter buffer overflow — CH22 8.8 High2025-10-27
CVE-2025-12273 Tenda CH22 webExcptypemanFilter fromwebExcptypemanFilter buffer overflow — CH22 8.8 High2025-10-27
CVE-2025-12272 Tenda CH22 addressNat fromAddressNat buffer overflow — CH22 8.8 High2025-10-27
CVE-2025-12271 Tenda CH22 RouteStatic fromRouteStatic buffer overflow — CH22 8.8 High2025-10-27
CVE-2025-12265 Tenda CH22 VirtualSer fromVirtualSer buffer overflow — CH22 8.8 High2025-10-27
CVE-2025-12240 TOTOLINK A3300R cstecgi.cgi setDmzCfg buffer overflow — A3300R 8.8 High2025-10-27
CVE-2025-12239 TOTOLINK A3300R cstecgi.cgi setDdnsCfg buffer overflow — A3300R 8.8 High2025-10-27
CVE-2025-12236 Tenda CH22 DhcpListClient fromDhcpListClient buffer overflow — CH22 8.8 High2025-10-27
CVE-2025-12235 Tenda CH22 SetIpBind fromSetIpBind buffer overflow — CH22 8.0 High2025-10-27
CVE-2025-12234 Tenda CH22 SafeMacFilter fromSafeMacFilter buffer overflow — CH22 8.8 High2025-10-27
CVE-2025-12233 Tenda CH22 SafeUrlFilter fromSafeUrlFilter buffer overflow — CH22 8.8 High2025-10-27
CVE-2025-12232 Tenda CH22 SafeClientFilter fromSafeClientFilter buffer overflow — CH22 8.8 High2025-10-27

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-120 (未进行输入大小检查的缓冲区拷贝(传统缓冲区溢出)) represent 1767 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.