Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1000 CNY

100.0%

CWE-120 (未进行输入大小检查的缓冲区拷贝(传统缓冲区溢出)) — Vulnerability Class 1767

1767 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-120 (未进行输入大小检查的缓冲区拷贝(传统缓冲区溢出)). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-120 represents a critical memory safety vulnerability where software copies data into a fixed-size buffer without validating the input’s length against the destination’s capacity. This classic buffer overflow occurs when an attacker supplies input exceeding the allocated memory space, causing data to spill into adjacent memory regions. Exploitation typically involves injecting malicious code or altering program control flow, such as overwriting return addresses to execute arbitrary commands. Developers prevent this weakness by implementing rigorous bounds checking before any copy operation, ensuring the input size never exceeds the buffer’s limits. Utilizing safer, language-specific functions that automatically handle size verification, or adopting modern programming languages with built-in memory safety features, effectively mitigates this risk and preserves application integrity against memory corruption attacks.

MITRE CWE Description
The product copies an input buffer to an output buffer without verifying that the size of the input buffer is less than the size of the output buffer.
Common Consequences (2)
Integrity, Confidentiality, AvailabilityModify Memory, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands
Buffer overflows often can be used to execute arbitrary code, which is usually outside the scope of the product's implicit security policy. This can often be used to subvert any other security service.
AvailabilityModify Memory, DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU)
Buffer overflows generally lead to crashes. Other attacks leading to lack of availability are possible, including putting the product into an infinite loop.
Mitigations (5)
RequirementsUse a language that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, many languages that perform their own memory management, such as Java and Perl, are not subject to buffer overflows. Other languages, such as Ada and C#, typically provide overflow protection, but the protection can be disabled by the programmer. Be wary that a lan…
Architecture and DesignUse a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. Examples include the Safe C String Library (SafeStr) by Messier and Viega [REF-57], and the Strsafe.h library from Microsoft [REF-56]. These libraries provide safer versions of overflow-prone string-handling functions.
Operation, Build and CompilationUse automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index checking. D3-SFCV (Stack Frame Canary Validation) from D3FEND [REF-1334] discusses…
Effectiveness: Defense in Depth
ImplementationConsider adhering to the following rules when allocating and managing an application's memory: Double check that your buffer is as large as you specify. When using functions that accept a number of bytes to copy, such as strncpy(), be aware that if the destination buffer size is equal to the source buffer size, it may not NULL-terminate the string. Check buffer boundaries if accessing the buffer i…
ImplementationAssume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range…
Examples (2)
The following code asks the user to enter their last name and then attempts to store the value entered in the last_name array.
char last_name[20]; printf ("Enter your last name: "); scanf ("%s", last_name);
Bad · C
The following code attempts to create a local copy of a buffer to perform some manipulations to the data.
void manipulate_string(char * string){ char buf[24]; strcpy(buf, string); ... }
Bad · C
CVE IDTitleCVSSSeverityPublished
CVE-2018-25315 Alloksoft Video joiner 4.6.1217 Buffer Overflow via License Name — Video Joiner 8.4 High2026-04-29
CVE-2018-25313 SysGauge 4.5.18 Local Denial of Service via Proxy Configuration — SysGauge 6.2 Medium2026-04-29
CVE-2018-25314 Allok soft WMV to AVI MPEG DVD WMV Converter 4.6.1217 Buffer Overflow — WMV to AVI MPEG DVD WMV Converter 8.4 High2026-04-29
CVE-2018-25307 SysGauge Pro 4.6.12 Local Buffer Overflow SEH — SysGauge Pro 8.4 High2026-04-29
CVE-2018-25306 PDFunite 0.41.0 Buffer Overflow via Malformed PDF — PDFunite 6.2 Medium2026-04-29
CVE-2018-25305 librsvg2-bin 2.40.13 Buffer Overflow via Malformed SVG — RSVG 6.2 Medium2026-04-29
CVE-2018-25304 Free Download Manager 2.0 Built 417 Local Buffer Overflow SEH — Free Download Manager 8.4 High2026-04-29
CVE-2018-25301 Easy MPEG to DVD Burner 1.7.11 SEH Local Buffer Overflow — Easy MPEG to DVD Burner 8.4 High2026-04-29
CVE-2018-25302 Allok AVI to DVD SVCD VCD Converter 4.0.1217 Buffer Overflow SEH — Allok AVI to DVD SVCD VCD Converter 7.8 High2026-04-29
CVE-2018-25299 Prime95 29.4b8 Local Buffer Overflow via SEH — Prime95 8.4 High2026-04-29
CVE-2026-7289 D-Link DIR-825M formWanConfigSetup sub_414BA8 buffer overflow — DIR-825M 8.8 High2026-04-28
CVE-2026-7288 D-Link DIR-825M formVpnConfigSetup sub_4151FC buffer overflow — DIR-825M 8.8 High2026-04-28
CVE-2026-7248 D-Link DI-8100 CGI Endpoint tgfile.htm tgfile_htm buffer overflow — DI-8100 9.8 Critical2026-04-28
CVE-2026-7247 D-Link DI-8100 File Extension file_exten.asp file_exten_asp buffer overflow — DI-8100 7.2 High2026-04-28
CVE-2026-7219 Totolink N300RT formIpQoS buffer overflow — N300RT 7.2 High2026-04-28
CVE-2026-7218 Totolink N300RT libapmib.so formWsc is_cmd_string_valid buffer overflow — N300RT 7.2 High2026-04-28
CVE-2026-7101 Tenda F456 httpd WrlclientSet fromWrlclientSet buffer overflow — F456 8.8 High2026-04-27
CVE-2026-7100 Tenda F456 httpd Natlimit fromNatlimitof buffer overflow — F456 8.8 High2026-04-27
CVE-2026-7099 Tenda F456 httpd QuickIndex formQuickIndex buffer overflow — F456 8.8 High2026-04-27
CVE-2026-7098 Tenda F456 httpd DhcpListClient fromDhcpListClient buffer overflow — F456 8.8 High2026-04-27
CVE-2026-7097 Tenda F456 httpd webExcptypemanFilter fromwebExcptypemanFilter buffer overflow — F456 8.8 High2026-04-27
CVE-2026-7082 Tenda F456 httpd WrlExtraSet formWrlExtraSet buffer overflow — F456 8.8 High2026-04-27
CVE-2026-7081 Tenda F456 httpd GstDhcpSetSer fromGstDhcpSetSer buffer overflow — F456 8.8 High2026-04-27
CVE-2026-7080 Tenda F456 httpd PPTPUserSetting fromPPTPUserSetting buffer overflow — F456 8.8 High2026-04-27
CVE-2026-7079 Tenda F456 httpd AdvSetWan fromAdvSetWan buffer overflow — F456 8.8 High2026-04-27
CVE-2026-7078 Tenda F456 httpd SetIpBind fromSetIpBind buffer overflow — F456 8.8 High2026-04-27
CVE-2026-7069 D-Link DIR-825 miniupnpd upnpsoap.c AddPortMapping buffer overflow — DIR-825 8.0 High2026-04-27
CVE-2026-7068 D-Link DIR-825 nmbd sserver.c NMBD_process buffer overflow — DIR-825 8.8 High2026-04-26
CVE-2026-7057 Tenda F456 httpd setcfm buffer overflow — F456 8.8 High2026-04-26
CVE-2026-7056 Tenda F456 httpd SafeUrlFilter fromSafeUrlFilter buffer overflow — F456 8.8 High2026-04-26

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-120 (未进行输入大小检查的缓冲区拷贝(传统缓冲区溢出)) represent 1767 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.