Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1000 CNY

100.0%

CWE-120 (未进行输入大小检查的缓冲区拷贝(传统缓冲区溢出)) — Vulnerability Class 1767

1767 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-120 (未进行输入大小检查的缓冲区拷贝(传统缓冲区溢出)). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-120 represents a critical memory safety vulnerability where software copies data into a fixed-size buffer without validating the input’s length against the destination’s capacity. This classic buffer overflow occurs when an attacker supplies input exceeding the allocated memory space, causing data to spill into adjacent memory regions. Exploitation typically involves injecting malicious code or altering program control flow, such as overwriting return addresses to execute arbitrary commands. Developers prevent this weakness by implementing rigorous bounds checking before any copy operation, ensuring the input size never exceeds the buffer’s limits. Utilizing safer, language-specific functions that automatically handle size verification, or adopting modern programming languages with built-in memory safety features, effectively mitigates this risk and preserves application integrity against memory corruption attacks.

MITRE CWE Description
The product copies an input buffer to an output buffer without verifying that the size of the input buffer is less than the size of the output buffer.
Common Consequences (2)
Integrity, Confidentiality, AvailabilityModify Memory, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands
Buffer overflows often can be used to execute arbitrary code, which is usually outside the scope of the product's implicit security policy. This can often be used to subvert any other security service.
AvailabilityModify Memory, DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU)
Buffer overflows generally lead to crashes. Other attacks leading to lack of availability are possible, including putting the product into an infinite loop.
Mitigations (5)
RequirementsUse a language that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, many languages that perform their own memory management, such as Java and Perl, are not subject to buffer overflows. Other languages, such as Ada and C#, typically provide overflow protection, but the protection can be disabled by the programmer. Be wary that a lan…
Architecture and DesignUse a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. Examples include the Safe C String Library (SafeStr) by Messier and Viega [REF-57], and the Strsafe.h library from Microsoft [REF-56]. These libraries provide safer versions of overflow-prone string-handling functions.
Operation, Build and CompilationUse automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index checking. D3-SFCV (Stack Frame Canary Validation) from D3FEND [REF-1334] discusses…
Effectiveness: Defense in Depth
ImplementationConsider adhering to the following rules when allocating and managing an application's memory: Double check that your buffer is as large as you specify. When using functions that accept a number of bytes to copy, such as strncpy(), be aware that if the destination buffer size is equal to the source buffer size, it may not NULL-terminate the string. Check buffer boundaries if accessing the buffer i…
ImplementationAssume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range…
Examples (2)
The following code asks the user to enter their last name and then attempts to store the value entered in the last_name array.
char last_name[20]; printf ("Enter your last name: "); scanf ("%s", last_name);
Bad · C
The following code attempts to create a local copy of a buffer to perform some manipulations to the data.
void manipulate_string(char * string){ char buf[24]; strcpy(buf, string); ... }
Bad · C
CVE IDTitleCVSSSeverityPublished
CVE-2025-53474 BIG-IP iRules vulnerability — BIG-IP 7.5 High2025-10-15
CVE-2025-20709 MediaTek Chipsets 安全漏洞 — MT6890, MT7915, MT7916, MT7981, MT7986 8.8AIHighAI2025-10-14
CVE-2025-41707 Phoenix Contact: WebSocket Handler Denial of Service — QUINT4-UPS/24DC/24DC/5/EIP 5.3 Medium2025-10-14
CVE-2025-41706 Phoenix Contact: Webserver Denial of Service through Malformed Content-Length — QUINT4-UPS/24DC/24DC/5/EIP 5.3 Medium2025-10-14
CVE-2025-11653 UTT HiPER 2620G fNTP strcpy buffer overflow — HiPER 2620G 8.8 High2025-10-13
CVE-2025-11652 UTT 进取 518G formTaskEdit_ap buffer overflow — 进取 518G 8.8 High2025-10-13
CVE-2025-11651 UTT 进取 518G formRemoteControl sub_4247AC buffer overflow — 进取 518G 8.8 High2025-10-12
CVE-2025-52960 Junos OS: SRX Series and MX Series: Receipt of specific SIP packets in a high utilization situation causes a flowd/mspmand crash — Junos OS 5.9 Medium2025-10-09
CVE-2025-47341 Buffer Copy Without Checking Size of Input in Camera — Snapdragon 7.8 High2025-10-09
CVE-2025-11444 TOTOLINK N600R HTTP Request cstecgi.cgi setWiFiBasicConfig buffer overflow — N600R 8.8 High2025-10-08
CVE-2025-11408 D-Link DI-7001 MINI dbsrv.asp buffer overflow — DI-7001 MINI 8.8 High2025-10-07
CVE-2025-11385 Tenda AC20 fast_setting_wifi_set sscanf buffer overflow — AC20 8.8 High2025-10-07
CVE-2025-11356 Tenda AC23 SetStaticRouteCfg sscanf buffer overflow — AC23 8.8 High2025-10-07
CVE-2025-11355 UTT 1250GW aspChangeChannel strcpy buffer overflow — 1250GW 8.8 High2025-10-07
CVE-2025-11339 D-Link DI-7100G C1 jhttpd hi_block.asp sub_4BD4F8 buffer overflow — DI-7100G C1 8.8 High2025-10-06
CVE-2025-11338 D-Link DI-7100G C1 jhttpd login.cgi sub_4C0990 buffer overflow — DI-7100G C1 8.8 High2025-10-06
CVE-2025-11323 UTT 1250GW formUserStatusRemark strcpy buffer overflow — 1250GW 8.8 High2025-10-06
CVE-2025-11305 UTT HiPER 840G formTaskEdit strcpy buffer overflow — HiPER 840G 8.8 High2025-10-05
CVE-2025-11302 Belkin F9K1015 formWpsStart buffer overflow — F9K1015 8.8 High2025-10-05
CVE-2025-11301 Belkin F9K1015 formWlanSetupWPS buffer overflow — F9K1015 8.8 High2025-10-05
CVE-2025-11300 Belkin F9K1015 formWlanMP buffer overflow — F9K1015 8.8 High2025-10-05
CVE-2025-11299 Belkin F9K1015 formWanTcpipSetup buffer overflow — F9K1015 8.8 High2025-10-05
CVE-2025-11297 Belkin F9K1015 formSetLanguage buffer overflow — F9K1015 8.8 High2025-10-05
CVE-2025-11296 Belkin F9K1015 formPPTPSetup buffer overflow — F9K1015 8.8 High2025-10-05
CVE-2025-11295 Belkin F9K1015 formPPPoESetup buffer overflow — F9K1015 8.8 High2025-10-05
CVE-2025-11294 Belkin F9K1015 formL2TPSetup buffer overflow — F9K1015 8.8 High2025-10-05
CVE-2025-11293 Belkin F9K1015 formConnectionSetting buffer overflow — F9K1015 8.8 High2025-10-05
CVE-2025-11120 Tenda AC8 SetServerConfig formSetServerConfig buffer overflow — AC8 8.8 High2025-09-28
CVE-2025-11117 Tenda CH22 GstDhcpSetSer formWrlExtraGet buffer overflow — CH22 8.8 High2025-09-28
CVE-2025-11091 Tenda AC21 SetStaticRouteCfg sscanf buffer overflow — AC21 8.8 High2025-09-28

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-120 (未进行输入大小检查的缓冲区拷贝(传统缓冲区溢出)) represent 1767 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.