Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1000 CNY

100.0%

CWE-120 (未进行输入大小检查的缓冲区拷贝(传统缓冲区溢出)) — Vulnerability Class 1767

1767 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-120 (未进行输入大小检查的缓冲区拷贝(传统缓冲区溢出)). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-120 represents a critical memory safety vulnerability where software copies data into a fixed-size buffer without validating the input’s length against the destination’s capacity. This classic buffer overflow occurs when an attacker supplies input exceeding the allocated memory space, causing data to spill into adjacent memory regions. Exploitation typically involves injecting malicious code or altering program control flow, such as overwriting return addresses to execute arbitrary commands. Developers prevent this weakness by implementing rigorous bounds checking before any copy operation, ensuring the input size never exceeds the buffer’s limits. Utilizing safer, language-specific functions that automatically handle size verification, or adopting modern programming languages with built-in memory safety features, effectively mitigates this risk and preserves application integrity against memory corruption attacks.

MITRE CWE Description
The product copies an input buffer to an output buffer without verifying that the size of the input buffer is less than the size of the output buffer.
Common Consequences (2)
Integrity, Confidentiality, AvailabilityModify Memory, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands
Buffer overflows often can be used to execute arbitrary code, which is usually outside the scope of the product's implicit security policy. This can often be used to subvert any other security service.
AvailabilityModify Memory, DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU)
Buffer overflows generally lead to crashes. Other attacks leading to lack of availability are possible, including putting the product into an infinite loop.
Mitigations (5)
RequirementsUse a language that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, many languages that perform their own memory management, such as Java and Perl, are not subject to buffer overflows. Other languages, such as Ada and C#, typically provide overflow protection, but the protection can be disabled by the programmer. Be wary that a lan…
Architecture and DesignUse a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. Examples include the Safe C String Library (SafeStr) by Messier and Viega [REF-57], and the Strsafe.h library from Microsoft [REF-56]. These libraries provide safer versions of overflow-prone string-handling functions.
Operation, Build and CompilationUse automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index checking. D3-SFCV (Stack Frame Canary Validation) from D3FEND [REF-1334] discusses…
Effectiveness: Defense in Depth
ImplementationConsider adhering to the following rules when allocating and managing an application's memory: Double check that your buffer is as large as you specify. When using functions that accept a number of bytes to copy, such as strncpy(), be aware that if the destination buffer size is equal to the source buffer size, it may not NULL-terminate the string. Check buffer boundaries if accessing the buffer i…
ImplementationAssume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range…
Examples (2)
The following code asks the user to enter their last name and then attempts to store the value entered in the last_name array.
char last_name[20]; printf ("Enter your last name: "); scanf ("%s", last_name);
Bad · C
The following code attempts to create a local copy of a buffer to perform some manipulations to the data.
void manipulate_string(char * string){ char buf[24]; strcpy(buf, string); ... }
Bad · C
CVE IDTitleCVSSSeverityPublished
CVE-2025-20333 Cisco Secure Firewall Adaptive Security Appliance和Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense 安全漏洞 — Cisco Secure Firewall Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software 9.9 Critical2025-09-25
CVE-2025-10953 UTT 1200GW/1250GW formApMail buffer overflow — 1200GW 8.8 High2025-09-25
CVE-2025-10948 MikroTik RouterOS libjson.so print parse_json_element buffer overflow — RouterOS 8.8 High2025-09-25
CVE-2025-10942 H3C Magic B3 aspForm EditMacList buffer overflow — Magic B3 8.8 High2025-09-25
CVE-2025-20149 Cisco IOS和Cisco IOS XE 安全漏洞 — IOS 6.5 Medium2025-09-24
CVE-2025-21481 Buffer Copy Without Checking Size of Input in HLOS — Snapdragon 7.8 High2025-09-24
CVE-2025-21476 Buffer Copy Without Checking Size of Input in Computer Vision — Snapdragon 7.8 High2025-09-24
CVE-2025-9962 Unauthenticated Buffer Overflow — P series (P07, P10, P12, P15) 9.8AICriticalAI2025-09-23
CVE-2025-10838 Tenda AC21 WifiExtraSet sub_45BB10 buffer overflow — AC21 8.8 High2025-09-23
CVE-2025-10815 Tenda AC20 HTTP POST Request SetPptpServerCfg strcpy buffer overflow — AC20 8.8 High2025-09-22
CVE-2025-8892 PRT File Parsing Memory Corruption Vulnerability — Shared Components 7.8 High2025-09-22
CVE-2025-10803 Tenda AC23 HTTP POST Request SetPptpServerCfg sscanf buffer overflow — AC23 8.8 High2025-09-22
CVE-2025-10792 D-Link DIR-513 formWPS buffer overflow — DIR-513 8.8 High2025-09-22
CVE-2025-10757 UTT 1200GW formConfigDnsFilterGlobal buffer overflow — 1200GW 8.8 High2025-09-20
CVE-2025-10756 UTT HiPER 840G getOneApConfTempEntry buffer overflow — HiPER 840G 8.8 High2025-09-20
CVE-2025-10666 D-Link DIR-825 apply.cgi sub_4106d4 buffer overflow — DIR-825 8.8 High2025-09-18
CVE-2025-10443 Tenda AC9/AC15 exeCommand formexeCommand buffer overflow — AC9 8.8 High2025-09-15
CVE-2025-10385 Mercury KM08-708H GiGA WiFi Wave2 mcr_setSysAdm sub_450B2C buffer overflow — KM08-708H GiGA WiFi Wave2 8.8 High2025-09-14
CVE-2025-10172 UTT 750W formPictureUrl buffer overflow — 750W 8.8 High2025-09-09
CVE-2025-10171 UTT 1250GW formConfigApConfTemp sub_453DC buffer overflow — 1250GW 8.8 High2025-09-09
CVE-2025-49458 Zoom Workplace Clients - Buffer Overflow — Zoom Workplace Clients 6.5 Medium2025-09-09
CVE-2025-10170 UTT 1200GW formApLbConfig sub_4B48F8 buffer overflow — 1200GW 8.8 High2025-09-09
CVE-2025-10169 UTT 1200GW ConfigWirelessBase buffer overflow — 1200GW 8.8 High2025-09-09
CVE-2025-10120 Tenda AC20 GetParentControlInfo strcpy buffer overflow — AC20 8.8 High2025-09-09
CVE-2025-10034 D-Link DIR-825 httpd ping6_response.cg get_ping6_app_stat buffer overflow — DIR-825 8.8 High2025-09-06
CVE-2025-9961 Authenticated RCE by CWMP binary — AX10 V1/V1.2/V2/V2.6/V3/V3.6 7.5AIHighAI2025-09-06
CVE-2025-9813 Tenda CH22 SetSambaConf formSetSambaConf buffer overflow — CH22 8.8 High2025-09-02
CVE-2025-9812 Tenda CH22 exeCommand formexeCommand buffer overflow — CH22 8.8 High2025-09-02
CVE-2025-9783 TOTOLINK A702R formParentControl sub_418030 buffer overflow — A702R 8.8 High2025-09-01
CVE-2025-9782 TOTOLINK A702R formOneKeyAccessButton sub_4466F8 buffer overflow — A702R 8.8 High2025-09-01

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-120 (未进行输入大小检查的缓冲区拷贝(传统缓冲区溢出)) represent 1767 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.