CVE-2021-29550— Division by 0 in `FractionalAvgPool`
Get alerts for future matching vulnerabilitiesLog in to subscribe
I. Basic Information for CVE-2021-29550
Vulnerability Information
Have questions about the vulnerability? See if Shenlong's analysis helps!
View Shenlong Deep Dive ↗ Although we use advanced large model technology, its output may still contain inaccurate or outdated information.Shenlong tries to ensure data accuracy, but please verify and judge based on the actual situation.
Vulnerability Title
Division by 0 in `FractionalAvgPool`
Source: NVD (National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Description
TensorFlow is an end-to-end open source platform for machine learning. An attacker can cause a runtime division by zero error and denial of service in `tf.raw_ops.FractionalAvgPool`. This is because the implementation(https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/blob/acc8ee69f5f46f92a3f1f11230f49c6ac266f10c/tensorflow/core/kernels/fractional_avg_pool_op.cc#L85-L89) computes a divisor quantity by dividing two user controlled values. The user controls the values of `input_size[i]` and `pooling_ratio_[i]` (via the `value.shape()` and `pooling_ratio` arguments). If the value in `input_size[i]` is smaller than the `pooling_ratio_[i]`, then the floor operation results in `output_size[i]` being 0. The `DCHECK_GT` line is a no-op outside of debug mode, so in released versions of TF this does not trigger. Later, these computed values are used as arguments(https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/blob/acc8ee69f5f46f92a3f1f11230f49c6ac266f10c/tensorflow/core/kernels/fractional_avg_pool_op.cc#L96-L99) to `GeneratePoolingSequence`(https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/blob/acc8ee69f5f46f92a3f1f11230f49c6ac266f10c/tensorflow/core/kernels/fractional_pool_common.cc#L100-L108). There, the first computation is a division in a modulo operation. Since `output_length` can be 0, this results in runtime crashing. The fix will be included in TensorFlow 2.5.0. We will also cherrypick this commit on TensorFlow 2.4.2, TensorFlow 2.3.3, TensorFlow 2.2.3 and TensorFlow 2.1.4, as these are also affected and still in supported range.
Source: NVD (National Vulnerability Database)
CVSS Information
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Source: NVD (National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Type
除零错误
Source: NVD (National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Title
Google TensorFlow 数字错误漏洞
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Description
Google TensorFlow是美国谷歌（Google）公司的一套用于机器学习的端到端开源平台。 TensorFlow 2.4.2,2.3.3,2.2.3，2.1.4存在数字错误漏洞，攻击者可利用该漏洞可以导致tf.raw_ops.FractionalAvgPool中的运行时除零错误和拒绝服务。
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
CVSS Information
N/A
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Type
N/A
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
Affected Products
| Vendor | Product | Affected Versions | CPE | Subscribe |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| tensorflow | tensorflow | < 2.1.4 | - |
II. Public POCs for CVE-2021-29550
| # | POC Description | Source Link | Shenlong Link |
|---|
AI-Generated POCPremium
No public POC found.
Login to generate AI POCIII. Intelligence Information for CVE-2021-29550
请登录查看更多情报信息。
Same Patch Batch · tensorflow · 2021-05-14 · 108 CVEs total
| CVE-2021-29591 | 7.3 HIGH | Stack overflow due to looping TFLite subgraph |
| CVE-2021-29605 | 7.1 HIGH | Integer overflow in TFLite memory allocation |
| CVE-2021-29606 | 7.1 HIGH | Heap OOB read in TFLite |
| CVE-2021-29614 | 7.1 HIGH | Interpreter crash from `tf.io.decode_raw` |
| CVE-2021-29601 | 6.3 MEDIUM | Integer overflow in TFLite concatentation |
| CVE-2021-29613 | 6.3 MEDIUM | Incomplete validation in `tf.raw_ops.CTCLoss` |
| CVE-2021-29607 | 5.3 MEDIUM | Incomplete validation in `SparseSparseMinimum` |
| CVE-2021-29608 | 5.3 MEDIUM | Heap OOB and null pointer dereference in `RaggedTensorToTensor` |
| CVE-2021-29609 | 5.3 MEDIUM | Incomplete validation in `SparseAdd` |
| CVE-2021-29571 | 4.5 MEDIUM | Memory corruption in `DrawBoundingBoxesV2` |
| CVE-2021-29592 | 4.4 MEDIUM | Null pointer dereference in TFLite's `Reshape` operator |
| CVE-2021-29612 | 3.6 LOW | Heap buffer overflow in `BandedTriangularSolve` |
| CVE-2021-29611 | 3.6 LOW | Incomplete validation in `SparseReshape` |
| CVE-2021-29610 | 3.6 LOW | Invalid validation in `QuantizeAndDequantizeV2` |
| CVE-2021-29525 | 2.5 LOW | Division by 0 in `Conv2DBackpropInput` |
| CVE-2021-29527 | 2.5 LOW | Division by 0 in `QuantizedConv2D` |
| CVE-2021-29584 | 2.5 LOW | CHECK-fail due to integer overflow |
| CVE-2021-29583 | 2.5 LOW | Heap buffer overflow and undefined behavior in `FusedBatchNorm` |
| CVE-2021-29582 | 2.5 LOW | Heap OOB read in `tf.raw_ops.Dequantize` |
| CVE-2021-29572 | 2.5 LOW | Reference binding to nullptr in `SdcaOptimizer` |
Showing top 20 of 108 CVEs. View all on vendor page → →
IV. Related Vulnerabilities
Same product: tensorflow
Same vendor: tensorflow
- CVE-2026-2492
TensorFlow HDF5 Library Uncontrolled Search Path Element Loc - CVE-2023-33976
TensorFlow segfault in array_ops.upper_bound - CVE-2024-3660
Arbitrary code injection vulnerability in Keras framework < - CVE-2023-25661
Denial of Service in TensorFlow - CVE-2023-25660
TensorFlow vulnerable to seg fault in `tf.raw_ops.Print`
V. Comments for CVE-2021-29550
No comments yet