Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1000 CNY

100.0%

CWE-94 (对生成代码的控制不恰当(代码注入)) — Vulnerability Class 1335

1335 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-94 (对生成代码的控制不恰当(代码注入)). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-94 represents a critical code injection weakness where software constructs executable code using untrusted input without proper sanitization. Attackers typically exploit this vulnerability by injecting malicious scripts or commands into user-supplied fields, such as web forms or API parameters, which the application then executes directly. This allows adversaries to bypass security controls, steal sensitive data, or gain unauthorized administrative access to the underlying system. To prevent such exploits, developers must rigorously validate and sanitize all external inputs, ensuring that only expected characters are processed. Implementing strict allow-listing strategies, utilizing parameterized queries for database interactions, and avoiding dynamic code execution functions like eval() are essential defensive measures. By treating all user input as potentially hostile and applying robust encoding techniques, organizations can effectively neutralize injection vectors and maintain application integrity.

MITRE CWE Description
The product constructs all or part of a code segment using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the syntax or behavior of the intended code segment.
Common Consequences (4)
Access ControlBypass Protection Mechanism
In some cases, injectable code controls authentication; this may lead to a remote vulnerability.
Access ControlGain Privileges or Assume Identity
Injected code can access resources that the attacker is directly prevented from accessing.
Integrity, Confidentiality, AvailabilityExecute Unauthorized Code or Commands
When a product allows a user's input to contain code syntax, it might be possible for an attacker to craft the code in such a way that it will alter the intended control flow of the product. As a result, code injection can often result in the execution of arbitrary code. Code injection attacks can…
Non-RepudiationHide Activities
Often the actions performed by injected control code are unlogged.
Mitigations (5)
Architecture and DesignRefactor your program so that you do not have to dynamically generate code.
Architecture and DesignRun your code in a "jail" or similar sandbox environment that enforces strict boundaries between the process and the operating system. This may effectively restrict which code can be executed by your product. Examples include the Unix chroot jail and AppArmor. In general, managed code may provide some protection. This may not be a feasible solution, and it only limits the impact to the operating s…
ImplementationAssume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range…
TestingUse dynamic tools and techniques that interact with the product using large test suites with many diverse inputs, such as fuzz testing (fuzzing), robustness testing, and fault injection. The product's operation may slow down, but it should not become unstable, crash, or generate incorrect results.
OperationRun the code in an environment that performs automatic taint propagation and prevents any command execution that uses tainted variables, such as Perl's "-T" switch. This will force the program to perform validation steps that remove the taint, although you must be careful to correctly validate your inputs so that you do not accidentally mark dangerous inputs as untainted (see CWE-183 and CWE-184).
Examples (2)
This example attempts to write user messages to a message file and allow users to view them.
$MessageFile = "messages.out"; if ($_GET["action"] == "NewMessage") { $name = $_GET["name"]; $message = $_GET["message"]; $handle = fopen($MessageFile, "a+"); fwrite($handle, "<b>$name</b> says '$message'<hr>\n"); fclose($handle); echo "Message Saved!<p>\n"; } else if ($_GET["action"] == "ViewMessages") { include($MessageFile); }
Bad · PHP
name=h4x0r message=%3C?php%20system(%22/bin/ls%20-l%22);?%3E
Attack
edit-config.pl: This CGI script is used to modify settings in a configuration file.
use CGI qw(:standard); sub config_file_add_key { my ($fname, $key, $arg) = @_; # code to add a field/key to a file goes here } sub config_file_set_key { my ($fname, $key, $arg) = @_; # code to set key to a particular file goes here } sub config_file_delete_key { my ($fname, $key, $arg) = @_; # code to delete key from a particular file goes here } sub handleConfigAction { my ($fname, $action) = @_; my $key = param('key'); my $val = param('val'); # this is super-efficient code, especially if you have to invoke # any one of dozens of different functions! my $code = "config_file_$action_key(\$fnam
Bad · Perl
add_key(",","); system("/bin/ls");
Attack
CVE IDTitleCVSSSeverityPublished
CVE-2023-26107 SketchSVG 代码注入漏洞 — sketchsvg 6.9 Medium2023-03-06
CVE-2023-22381 Code injection in GitHub Enterprise Server leading to arbitrary environment variables in GitHub Actions — Enterprise Server 4.1 Medium2023-03-02
CVE-2023-1097 Unauthenticated Command Injection EG7035-M11 Series — EG7035-M11 9.3 Critical2023-03-01
CVE-2023-1005 JP1016 Markdown-Electron code injection — Markdown-Electron 5.3 Medium2023-02-24
CVE-2023-1004 MarkText WSH JScript code injection — MarkText 5.3 Medium2023-02-24
CVE-2023-1003 Typora WSH JScript code injection — Typora 5.3 Medium2023-02-24
CVE-2023-25657 Remote code execution in Jinja2 template rendering in Nautobot — nautobot 7.5 High2023-02-21
CVE-2021-26277 Security Advisory | PendingIntent hijacking vulnerability in Framework Services — Frame service 5.6 Medium2023-02-17
CVE-2023-0877 Code Injection in froxlor/froxlor — froxlor/froxlor 4.6 -2023-02-17
CVE-2023-21553 Azure DevOps Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Azure DevOps Server 2020.1.2 7.5 High2023-02-14
CVE-2023-23551 X-600M Code Injection — X-600M devices 9.1 Critical2023-02-13
CVE-2023-0788 Code Injection in thorsten/phpmyfaq — thorsten/phpmyfaq 8.1 High2023-02-12
CVE-2023-0792 Code Injection in thorsten/phpmyfaq — thorsten/phpmyfaq 6.5 Medium2023-02-12
CVE-2023-0671 Code Injection in froxlor/froxlor — froxlor/froxlor 4.6 -2023-02-04
CVE-2023-23477 IBM WebSphere Application Server code execution — WebSphere Application Server 8.1 High2023-02-03
CVE-2023-24576 Dell EMC NetWorker 代码注入漏洞 — NetWorker, NVE 7.5 High2023-02-03
CVE-2022-25967 Eta 安全漏洞 — eta 8.1 High2023-01-30
CVE-2023-23619 Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') in @asyncapi/modelina — modelina 10.0 Critical2023-01-26
CVE-2022-25894 UFLO 代码注入漏洞 — com.bstek.uflo:uflo-core 9.8 Critical2023-01-25
CVE-2022-25860 simple-git 安全漏洞 — simple-git 8.1 High2023-01-24
CVE-2022-34456 Dell EMC Metro node 代码注入漏洞 — Metro node 8.8 High2023-01-18
CVE-2023-22731 Improper Control of Generation of Code in Twig rendered views in shopware — platform 10.0 Critical2023-01-17
CVE-2023-0297 Code Injection in pyload/pyload — pyload/pyload 8.3 -2023-01-14
CVE-2023-0022 Code Injection vulnerability in SAP BusinessObjects Business Intelligence platform (Analysis edition for OLAP) — BusinessObjects Business Intelligence platform (Analysis edition for OLAP) 9.9 Critical2023-01-10
CVE-2023-0048 Code Injection in lirantal/daloradius — lirantal/daloradius 8.8 -2023-01-04
CVE-2015-10009 nterchange code_caller_controller.php getContent code injection — nterchange 5.5 Medium2023-01-02
CVE-2022-23474 editor.js contains Code Injection — editor.js 6.1 Medium2022-12-15
CVE-2022-23503 TYPO3 vulnerable to Arbitrary Code Execution via Form Framework — typo3 7.5 High2022-12-14
CVE-2022-41264 SAP Basis 代码注入漏洞 — BASIS 8.8 High2022-12-13
CVE-2022-4223 pgAdmin 代码注入漏洞 — pgadmin4 8.8 -2022-12-13

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-94 (对生成代码的控制不恰当(代码注入)) represent 1335 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.