Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1000 CNY

100.0%

CWE-77 (在命令中使用的特殊元素转义处理不恰当(命令注入)) — Vulnerability Class 1185

1185 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-77 (在命令中使用的特殊元素转义处理不恰当(命令注入)). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-77 represents a critical input validation weakness where software constructs commands using untrusted data without properly sanitizing special characters. Attackers typically exploit this by injecting malicious payloads, such as semicolons or pipe operators, into user-supplied fields to alter the intended command structure. This allows them to execute arbitrary system commands, potentially leading to full system compromise, data exfiltration, or denial of service. To prevent such vulnerabilities, developers must strictly validate and sanitize all external inputs, ensuring that only expected data formats are processed. Utilizing parameterized APIs or safe command execution libraries instead of direct string concatenation significantly reduces risk. Additionally, implementing the principle of least privilege for application processes limits the potential impact of successful injection attempts, thereby enhancing overall system security against command injection attacks.

MITRE CWE Description
The product constructs all or part of a command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended command when it is sent to a downstream component. Many protocols and products have their own custom command language. While OS or shell command strings are frequently discovered and targeted, developers may not realize that these other command languages might also be vulnerable to attacks.
Common Consequences (1)
Integrity, Confidentiality, AvailabilityExecute Unauthorized Code or Commands
If a malicious user injects a character (such as a semi-colon) that delimits the end of one command and the beginning of another, it may be possible to then insert an entirely new and unrelated command that was not intended to be executed. This gives an attacker a privilege or capability that they w…
Mitigations (5)
Architecture and DesignIf at all possible, use library calls rather than external processes to recreate the desired functionality.
ImplementationIf possible, ensure that all external commands called from the program are statically created.
ImplementationAssume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range…
OperationRun time: Run time policy enforcement may be used in an allowlist fashion to prevent use of any non-sanctioned commands.
System ConfigurationAssign permissions that prevent the user from accessing/opening privileged files.
Examples (2)
Consider a "CWE Differentiator" application that uses an an LLM generative AI based "chatbot" to explain the difference between two weaknesses. As input, it accepts two CWE IDs, constructs a prompt string, sends the prompt to the chatbot, and prints the results. The prompt string effectively acts as a command to the chatbot component. Assume that invokeChatbot() calls the chatbot and returns the …
prompt = "Explain the difference between {} and {}".format(arg1, arg2) result = invokeChatbot(prompt) resultHTML = encodeForHTML(result) print resultHTML
Bad · Python
Explain the difference between CWE-77 and CWE-78
Informative
Consider the following program. It intends to perform an "ls -l" on an input filename. The validate_name() subroutine performs validation on the input to make sure that only alphanumeric and "-" characters are allowed, which avoids path traversal (CWE-22) and OS command injection (CWE-78) weaknesses. Only filenames like "abc" or "d-e-f" are intended to be allowed.
my $arg = GetArgument("filename"); do_listing($arg); sub do_listing { my($fname) = @_; if (! validate_name($fname)) { print "Error: name is not well-formed!\n"; return; } # build command my $cmd = "/bin/ls -l $fname"; system($cmd); } sub validate_name { my($name) = @_; if ($name =~ /^[\w\-]+$/) { return(1); } else { return(0); } }
Bad · Perl
if ($name =~ /^\w[\w\-]+$/) ...
Good · Perl
CVE IDTitleCVSSSeverityPublished
CVE-2026-1192 Tosei Online Store Management System ネット店舗管理システム imode_alldata.php command injection — Online Store Management System ネット店舗管理システム 7.3 High2026-01-19
CVE-2026-1150 Totolink LR350 POST Request cstecgi.cgi setTracerouteCfg command injection — LR350 6.3 Medium2026-01-19
CVE-2026-1149 Totolink LR350 POST Request cstecgi.cgi setDiagnosisCfg command injection — LR350 6.3 Medium2026-01-19
CVE-2026-1125 D-Link DIR-823X set_wifidog_settings sub_412E7C command injection — DIR-823X 7.3 High2026-01-18
CVE-2026-1066 kalcaddle kodbox Compression zip command injection — kodbox 6.3 Medium2026-01-17
CVE-2026-1064 bastillion-io Bastillion System Management SystemKtrl.java command injection — Bastillion 4.7 Medium2026-01-17
CVE-2026-1063 bastillion-io Bastillion Public Key Management System AuthKeysKtrl.java command injection — Bastillion 4.7 Medium2026-01-17
CVE-2025-60021 Apache bRPC: Remote command injection vulnerability in heap builtin service — Apache bRPC 9.8 -2026-01-16
CVE-2026-0975 DIAView - Command Injection Vulnerability — DIAView 7.8 High2026-01-16
CVE-2026-22864 Deno has an incomplete fix for command-injection prevention on Windows — case-insensitive extension bypass — deno 8.1 High2026-01-15
CVE-2026-22755 Legacy Vivotek Camera Firmware Command Injection in upload_map.cgi — Affected device model numbers are FD8365, FD8365v2, FD9165, FD9171, FD9187, FD9189, FD9365, FD9371, FD9381, FD9387, FD9389, FD9391,FE9180,FE9181, FE9191, FE9381, FE9382, FE9391, FE9582, IB9365, IB93587LPR, IB9371,IB9381, IB9387, IB9389, IB939,IP9165,IP9171, IP9172, IP9181, IP9191, IT9389, MA9321, MA9322, MS9321, MS9390, TB9330 9.8AICriticalAI2026-01-13
CVE-2026-22785 orval MCP client is vulnerable to a code injection attack. — orval 8.2AIHighAI2026-01-12
CVE-2026-22688 WeKnora has Command Injection in MCP stdio test — WeKnora 10.0 Critical2026-01-10
CVE-2026-22601 OpenProject is Vulnerable to Code Execution in E-Mail function — openproject 7.2 -2026-01-10
CVE-2026-0732 D-Link DI-8200G upgrade_filter.asp command injection — DI-8200G 6.3 Medium2026-01-08
CVE-2026-0641 TOTOLINK WA300 cstecgi.cgi sub_401510 command injection — WA300 6.3 Medium2026-01-06
CVE-2025-64424 Colify has command injection vulnerability in project git source — coolify 8.8 -2026-01-05
CVE-2025-64419 Coolify vulnerable to command injection via docker-compose.yaml parameters — coolify 9.7 Critical2026-01-05
CVE-2026-0581 Tenda AC1206 httpd BehaviorManager formBehaviorManager command injection — AC1206 6.3 Medium2026-01-05
CVE-2025-15391 D-Link DIR-806A SSDP Request ssdpcgi_main command injection — DIR-806A 6.3 Medium2025-12-31
CVE-2025-15357 D-Link DI-7400G+ msp_info.htm command injection — DI-7400G+ 6.3 Medium2025-12-30
CVE-2025-69256 serverless MCP Server vulnerable to command injection in list-projects tool — serverless 7.5 High2025-12-30
CVE-2025-15257 Edimax BR-6208AC Web-based Configuration formRoute command injection — BR-6208AC 7.3 High2025-12-30
CVE-2025-15256 Edimax BR-6208AC Web-based Configuration formStaDrvSetup command injection — BR-6208AC 7.3 High2025-12-30
CVE-2025-69201 Tugtainer has RCE in Agent Command Execution Api — tugtainer 8.8 -2025-12-29
CVE-2025-15192 D-Link DWR-M920 formLtefotaUpgradeQuectel sub_415328 command injection — DWR-M920 6.3 Medium2025-12-29
CVE-2025-15191 D-Link DWR-M920 formLtefotaUpgradeFibocom sub_4155B4 command injection — DWR-M920 6.3 Medium2025-12-29
CVE-2025-15139 TRENDnet TEW-822DRE formWsc sub_43ACF4  command injection — TEW-822DRE 6.3 Medium2025-12-28
CVE-2025-15137 TRENDnet TEW-800MB NTPSyncWithHost.cgi sub_F934  command injection — TEW-800MB 8.8 High2025-12-28
CVE-2025-15136 TRENDnet TEW-800MB Management wizardset do_setWizard_asp command injection — TEW-800MB 8.8 High2025-12-28

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-77 (在命令中使用的特殊元素转义处理不恰当(命令注入)) represent 1185 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.