Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1000 CNY

100.0%

CWE-77 (在命令中使用的特殊元素转义处理不恰当(命令注入)) — Vulnerability Class 1185

1185 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-77 (在命令中使用的特殊元素转义处理不恰当(命令注入)). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-77 represents a critical input validation weakness where software constructs commands using untrusted data without properly sanitizing special characters. Attackers typically exploit this by injecting malicious payloads, such as semicolons or pipe operators, into user-supplied fields to alter the intended command structure. This allows them to execute arbitrary system commands, potentially leading to full system compromise, data exfiltration, or denial of service. To prevent such vulnerabilities, developers must strictly validate and sanitize all external inputs, ensuring that only expected data formats are processed. Utilizing parameterized APIs or safe command execution libraries instead of direct string concatenation significantly reduces risk. Additionally, implementing the principle of least privilege for application processes limits the potential impact of successful injection attempts, thereby enhancing overall system security against command injection attacks.

MITRE CWE Description
The product constructs all or part of a command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended command when it is sent to a downstream component. Many protocols and products have their own custom command language. While OS or shell command strings are frequently discovered and targeted, developers may not realize that these other command languages might also be vulnerable to attacks.
Common Consequences (1)
Integrity, Confidentiality, AvailabilityExecute Unauthorized Code or Commands
If a malicious user injects a character (such as a semi-colon) that delimits the end of one command and the beginning of another, it may be possible to then insert an entirely new and unrelated command that was not intended to be executed. This gives an attacker a privilege or capability that they w…
Mitigations (5)
Architecture and DesignIf at all possible, use library calls rather than external processes to recreate the desired functionality.
ImplementationIf possible, ensure that all external commands called from the program are statically created.
ImplementationAssume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range…
OperationRun time: Run time policy enforcement may be used in an allowlist fashion to prevent use of any non-sanctioned commands.
System ConfigurationAssign permissions that prevent the user from accessing/opening privileged files.
Examples (2)
Consider a "CWE Differentiator" application that uses an an LLM generative AI based "chatbot" to explain the difference between two weaknesses. As input, it accepts two CWE IDs, constructs a prompt string, sends the prompt to the chatbot, and prints the results. The prompt string effectively acts as a command to the chatbot component. Assume that invokeChatbot() calls the chatbot and returns the …
prompt = "Explain the difference between {} and {}".format(arg1, arg2) result = invokeChatbot(prompt) resultHTML = encodeForHTML(result) print resultHTML
Bad · Python
Explain the difference between CWE-77 and CWE-78
Informative
Consider the following program. It intends to perform an "ls -l" on an input filename. The validate_name() subroutine performs validation on the input to make sure that only alphanumeric and "-" characters are allowed, which avoids path traversal (CWE-22) and OS command injection (CWE-78) weaknesses. Only filenames like "abc" or "d-e-f" are intended to be allowed.
my $arg = GetArgument("filename"); do_listing($arg); sub do_listing { my($fname) = @_; if (! validate_name($fname)) { print "Error: name is not well-formed!\n"; return; } # build command my $cmd = "/bin/ls -l $fname"; system($cmd); } sub validate_name { my($name) = @_; if ($name =~ /^[\w\-]+$/) { return(1); } else { return(0); } }
Bad · Perl
if ($name =~ /^\w[\w\-]+$/) ...
Good · Perl
CVE IDTitleCVSSSeverityPublished
CVE-2026-4543 Wavlink WL-WN578W2 POST Request firewall.cgi command injection — WL-WN578W2 6.3 Medium2026-03-22
CVE-2026-4537 Cudy TR1200 ipsec.lua action_ipsec_conn command injection — TR1200 4.7 Medium2026-03-22
CVE-2025-15607 Authenticated Command Injection in mcsd Service of TP-Link Archer AX53 — AX53 v1 8.8 -2026-03-20
CVE-2026-4468 Comfast CF-AC100 mbox-config command injection — CF-AC100 4.7 Medium2026-03-20
CVE-2026-4467 Comfast CF-AC100 mbox-config command injection — CF-AC100 4.7 Medium2026-03-20
CVE-2026-4466 Comfast CF-AC100 mbox-config command injection — CF-AC100 4.7 Medium2026-03-20
CVE-2026-32194 Microsoft Bing Images Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Microsoft Bing Images 9.8 Critical2026-03-19
CVE-2026-24299 M365 Copilot Information Disclosure Vulnerability — Microsoft 365 Copilot 5.3 Medium2026-03-19
CVE-2026-26136 Microsoft Copilot Information Disclosure Vulnerability — Microsoft Copilot 6.5 Medium2026-03-19
CVE-2026-22317 Command Injection Vulnerability in Root CA Certificate Transfer Workflow — FL SWITCH 2005 7.2 High2026-03-18
CVE-2026-27811 Roxy-WI has a Command Injection via diff parameter in config comparison allows authenticated RCE — roxy-wi 8.8 High2026-03-17
CVE-2025-14031 IBM Sterling B2B Integrator and IBM Sterling File Gateway Denial of Service — Sterling B2B Integrator 7.5 High2026-03-17
CVE-2026-23862 Dell ThinOS 10 命令注入漏洞 — ThinOS 10 7.8 High2026-03-16
CVE-2026-4228 LB-LINK BL-WR9000 set_wifi sub_458754 command injection — BL-WR9000 6.3 Medium2026-03-16
CVE-2026-4210 D-Link DNS-1550-04 time_machine.cgi cgi_tm_set_share command injection — DNS-120 6.3 Medium2026-03-16
CVE-2026-4209 D-Link DNS-1550-04 account_mgr.cgi cgi_chg_admin_pw command injection — DNS-120 6.3 Medium2026-03-16
CVE-2026-4207 D-Link DNS-1550-04 system_mgr.cgi cgi_ntp_time command injection — DNS-120 6.3 Medium2026-03-16
CVE-2026-4206 D-Link DNS-1550-04 dsk_mgr.cgi ScanDisk_run_e2fsck command injection — DNS-120 6.3 Medium2026-03-16
CVE-2026-4205 D-Link DNS-1550-04 app_mgr.cgi FTP_Server_BlockIP_Del command injection — DNS-120 6.3 Medium2026-03-16
CVE-2026-4204 D-Link DNS-1550-04 gui_mgr.cgi cgi_mycloud_auto_downlaod command injection — DNS-120 6.3 Medium2026-03-16
CVE-2026-4203 D-Link DNS-1550-04 network_mgr.cgi cgi_dhcpd command injection — DNS-120 6.3 Medium2026-03-16
CVE-2026-4199 bazinga012 mcp_code_executor index.ts installDependencies command injection — mcp_code_executor 5.3 Medium2026-03-16
CVE-2026-4198 hypermodel-labs mcp-server-auto-commit index.ts getGitChanges command injection — mcp-server-auto-commit 5.3 Medium2026-03-15
CVE-2026-4197 D-Link DNS-1550-04 download_mgr.cgi RSS_Item_List command injection — DNS-120 6.3 Medium2026-03-15
CVE-2026-4196 D-Link DNS-1550-04 remote_backup.cgi cgi_set_rsync_server command injection — DNS-120 6.3 Medium2026-03-15
CVE-2026-4195 D-Link DNS-1550-04 wizard_mgr.cgi command injection — DNS-120 6.3 Medium2026-03-15
CVE-2026-4192 AvinashBole quip-mcp-server index.ts setupToolHandlers command injection — quip-mcp-server 6.3 Medium2026-03-15
CVE-2026-4164 Wavlink WL-WN578W2 POST Request wireless.cgi GuestWifi command injection — WL-WN578W2 9.8 Critical2026-03-15
CVE-2026-4163 Wavlink WL-WN579A3 POST Request wireless.cgi GuestWifi command injection — WL-WN579A3 9.8 Critical2026-03-14
CVE-2026-26133 M365 Copilot Information Disclosure Vulnerability — Microsoft 365 Copilot for Android 7.1 High2026-03-13

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-77 (在命令中使用的特殊元素转义处理不恰当(命令注入)) represent 1185 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.