Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1000 CNY

100.0%

CWE-77 (在命令中使用的特殊元素转义处理不恰当(命令注入)) — Vulnerability Class 1183

1183 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-77 (在命令中使用的特殊元素转义处理不恰当(命令注入)). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-77 represents a critical input validation weakness where software constructs commands using untrusted data without properly sanitizing special characters. Attackers typically exploit this by injecting malicious payloads, such as semicolons or pipe operators, into user-supplied fields to alter the intended command structure. This allows them to execute arbitrary system commands, potentially leading to full system compromise, data exfiltration, or denial of service. To prevent such vulnerabilities, developers must strictly validate and sanitize all external inputs, ensuring that only expected data formats are processed. Utilizing parameterized APIs or safe command execution libraries instead of direct string concatenation significantly reduces risk. Additionally, implementing the principle of least privilege for application processes limits the potential impact of successful injection attempts, thereby enhancing overall system security against command injection attacks.

MITRE CWE Description
The product constructs all or part of a command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended command when it is sent to a downstream component. Many protocols and products have their own custom command language. While OS or shell command strings are frequently discovered and targeted, developers may not realize that these other command languages might also be vulnerable to attacks.
Common Consequences (1)
Integrity, Confidentiality, AvailabilityExecute Unauthorized Code or Commands
If a malicious user injects a character (such as a semi-colon) that delimits the end of one command and the beginning of another, it may be possible to then insert an entirely new and unrelated command that was not intended to be executed. This gives an attacker a privilege or capability that they w…
Mitigations (5)
Architecture and DesignIf at all possible, use library calls rather than external processes to recreate the desired functionality.
ImplementationIf possible, ensure that all external commands called from the program are statically created.
ImplementationAssume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range…
OperationRun time: Run time policy enforcement may be used in an allowlist fashion to prevent use of any non-sanctioned commands.
System ConfigurationAssign permissions that prevent the user from accessing/opening privileged files.
Examples (2)
Consider a "CWE Differentiator" application that uses an an LLM generative AI based "chatbot" to explain the difference between two weaknesses. As input, it accepts two CWE IDs, constructs a prompt string, sends the prompt to the chatbot, and prints the results. The prompt string effectively acts as a command to the chatbot component. Assume that invokeChatbot() calls the chatbot and returns the …
prompt = "Explain the difference between {} and {}".format(arg1, arg2) result = invokeChatbot(prompt) resultHTML = encodeForHTML(result) print resultHTML
Bad · Python
Explain the difference between CWE-77 and CWE-78
Informative
Consider the following program. It intends to perform an "ls -l" on an input filename. The validate_name() subroutine performs validation on the input to make sure that only alphanumeric and "-" characters are allowed, which avoids path traversal (CWE-22) and OS command injection (CWE-78) weaknesses. Only filenames like "abc" or "d-e-f" are intended to be allowed.
my $arg = GetArgument("filename"); do_listing($arg); sub do_listing { my($fname) = @_; if (! validate_name($fname)) { print "Error: name is not well-formed!\n"; return; } # build command my $cmd = "/bin/ls -l $fname"; system($cmd); } sub validate_name { my($name) = @_; if ($name =~ /^[\w\-]+$/) { return(1); } else { return(0); } }
Bad · Perl
if ($name =~ /^\w[\w\-]+$/) ...
Good · Perl
CVE IDTitleCVSSSeverityPublished
CVE-2026-35580 Emissary has GitHub Actions Shell Injection via Workflow Inputs — emissary 9.1 Critical2026-04-07
CVE-2026-35558 Improper neutralization of special elements in authentication components in Amazon Athena ODBC driver — Amazon Athena ODBC driver 7.8 High2026-04-03
CVE-2026-5463 Pymetasploit3 安全漏洞 — pymetasploit3 8.6 High2026-04-03
CVE-2026-5339 Tenda G103 Setting gpon.lua action_set_net_settings command injection — G103 4.7 Medium2026-04-02
CVE-2026-5338 Tenda G103 Setting system.lua action_set_system_settings command injection — G103 4.7 Medium2026-04-02
CVE-2026-5333 DefaultFuction Content-Management-System tools.php command injection — Content-Management-System 7.3 High2026-04-02
CVE-2026-5327 efforthye fast-filesystem-mcp index.ts handleGetDiskUsage command injection — fast-filesystem-mcp 6.3 Medium2026-04-02
CVE-2026-20096 Cisco Integrated Management Controller Command Injection Vulnerability — Cisco Enterprise NFV Infrastructure Software 6.5 Medium2026-04-01
CVE-2026-20094 Cisco Integrated Management Controller Command Injection Vulnerability — Cisco Unified Computing System (Standalone) 8.8 High2026-04-01
CVE-2026-20095 Cisco Integrated Management Controller Command Injection Vulnerability — Cisco Enterprise NFV Infrastructure Software 6.5 Medium2026-04-01
CVE-2026-34243 wenxian: Command Injection in GitHub Actions Workflow via `issue_comment.body` — wenxian 9.8 Critical2026-03-31
CVE-2026-5184 TRENDnet TEW-713RE setSysAdm command injection — TEW-713RE 6.3 Medium2026-03-31
CVE-2026-5183 TRENDnet TEW-713RE addRouting sub_421494 command injection — TEW-713RE 6.3 Medium2026-03-31
CVE-2026-5178 Totolink A3300R cstecgi.cgi setIptvCfg command injection — A3300R 6.3 Medium2026-03-31
CVE-2026-5177 Totolink A3300R cstecgi.cgi setWiFiBasicCfg command injection — A3300R 6.3 Medium2026-03-31
CVE-2026-5176 Totolink A3300R cstecgi.cgi setSyslogCfg command injection — A3300R 7.3 High2026-03-31
CVE-2026-5153 Tenda CH22 WriteFacMac FormWriteFacMac command injection — CH22 6.3 Medium2026-03-30
CVE-2025-15379 Command Injection in mlflow/mlflow — mlflow/mlflow 8.8 -2026-03-30
CVE-2026-5105 Totolink A3300R Parameter cstecgi.cgi setVpnPassCfg command injection — A3300R 6.3 Medium2026-03-30
CVE-2026-5104 Totolink A3300R cstecgi.cgi setStaticRoute command injection — A3300R 6.3 Medium2026-03-30
CVE-2026-5103 Totolink A3300R cstecgi.cgi setUPnPCfg command injection — A3300R 6.3 Medium2026-03-30
CVE-2026-5102 Totolink A3300R Parameter cstecgi.cgi setSmartQosCfg command injection — A3300R 6.3 Medium2026-03-30
CVE-2026-5101 Totolink A3300R Parameter cstecgi.cgi setLanCfg command injection — A3300R 6.3 Medium2026-03-29
CVE-2026-5041 code-projects Chamber of Commerce Membership Management System pageMail.php fwrite command injection — Chamber of Commerce Membership Management System 4.7 Medium2026-03-29
CVE-2026-5030 Totolink NR1800X Telnet Service cstecgi.cgi NTPSyncWithHost command injection — NR1800X 6.3 Medium2026-03-29
CVE-2026-5020 Totolink A3600R Parameter cstecgi.cgi setNoticeCfg command injection — A3600R 6.3 Medium2026-03-29
CVE-2026-32241 Flannel vulnerable to cross-node remote code execution via extension backend BackendData injection — flannel 7.5 High2026-03-27
CVE-2026-4554 Tenda F453 WriteFacMac FormWriteFacMac privilege escalation — F453 6.3 Medium2026-03-22
CVE-2026-4543 Wavlink WL-WN578W2 POST Request firewall.cgi command injection — WL-WN578W2 6.3 Medium2026-03-22
CVE-2026-4537 Cudy TR1200 ipsec.lua action_ipsec_conn command injection — TR1200 4.7 Medium2026-03-22

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-77 (在命令中使用的特殊元素转义处理不恰当(命令注入)) represent 1183 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.