Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1000 CNY

100.0%

CWE-77 (在命令中使用的特殊元素转义处理不恰当(命令注入)) — Vulnerability Class 1185

1185 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-77 (在命令中使用的特殊元素转义处理不恰当(命令注入)). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-77 represents a critical input validation weakness where software constructs commands using untrusted data without properly sanitizing special characters. Attackers typically exploit this by injecting malicious payloads, such as semicolons or pipe operators, into user-supplied fields to alter the intended command structure. This allows them to execute arbitrary system commands, potentially leading to full system compromise, data exfiltration, or denial of service. To prevent such vulnerabilities, developers must strictly validate and sanitize all external inputs, ensuring that only expected data formats are processed. Utilizing parameterized APIs or safe command execution libraries instead of direct string concatenation significantly reduces risk. Additionally, implementing the principle of least privilege for application processes limits the potential impact of successful injection attempts, thereby enhancing overall system security against command injection attacks.

MITRE CWE Description
The product constructs all or part of a command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended command when it is sent to a downstream component. Many protocols and products have their own custom command language. While OS or shell command strings are frequently discovered and targeted, developers may not realize that these other command languages might also be vulnerable to attacks.
Common Consequences (1)
Integrity, Confidentiality, AvailabilityExecute Unauthorized Code or Commands
If a malicious user injects a character (such as a semi-colon) that delimits the end of one command and the beginning of another, it may be possible to then insert an entirely new and unrelated command that was not intended to be executed. This gives an attacker a privilege or capability that they w…
Mitigations (5)
Architecture and DesignIf at all possible, use library calls rather than external processes to recreate the desired functionality.
ImplementationIf possible, ensure that all external commands called from the program are statically created.
ImplementationAssume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range…
OperationRun time: Run time policy enforcement may be used in an allowlist fashion to prevent use of any non-sanctioned commands.
System ConfigurationAssign permissions that prevent the user from accessing/opening privileged files.
Examples (2)
Consider a "CWE Differentiator" application that uses an an LLM generative AI based "chatbot" to explain the difference between two weaknesses. As input, it accepts two CWE IDs, constructs a prompt string, sends the prompt to the chatbot, and prints the results. The prompt string effectively acts as a command to the chatbot component. Assume that invokeChatbot() calls the chatbot and returns the …
prompt = "Explain the difference between {} and {}".format(arg1, arg2) result = invokeChatbot(prompt) resultHTML = encodeForHTML(result) print resultHTML
Bad · Python
Explain the difference between CWE-77 and CWE-78
Informative
Consider the following program. It intends to perform an "ls -l" on an input filename. The validate_name() subroutine performs validation on the input to make sure that only alphanumeric and "-" characters are allowed, which avoids path traversal (CWE-22) and OS command injection (CWE-78) weaknesses. Only filenames like "abc" or "d-e-f" are intended to be allowed.
my $arg = GetArgument("filename"); do_listing($arg); sub do_listing { my($fname) = @_; if (! validate_name($fname)) { print "Error: name is not well-formed!\n"; return; } # build command my $cmd = "/bin/ls -l $fname"; system($cmd); } sub validate_name { my($name) = @_; if ($name =~ /^[\w\-]+$/) { return(1); } else { return(0); } }
Bad · Perl
if ($name =~ /^\w[\w\-]+$/) ...
Good · Perl
CVE IDTitleCVSSSeverityPublished
CVE-2024-5194 Arris VAP2500 assoc_table.php command injection — VAP2500 4.7 Medium2024-05-22
CVE-2024-5023 Arbitrary File Read Vulnerability in ConsoleMe via Limited Git command RCE — ConsoleMe 9.8AICriticalAI2024-05-16
CVE-2024-1417 Local Code Injection Vulnerability in AuthPoint Password Manager App for macOS Safari — AuthPoint Password Manager 7.8 High2024-05-16
CVE-2024-4999 Ligowave Unity/Pro/Mimo/APC Arbitrary Command Injection — UNITY 8.8AIHighAI2024-05-16
CVE-2024-2366 Remote Code Execution in parisneo/lollms-webui — parisneo/lollms-webui 9.8AICriticalAI2024-05-16
CVE-2024-4078 Arbitrary Code Execution in parisneo/lollms — parisneo/lollms 9.8AICriticalAI2024-05-16
CVE-2024-34713 sshproxy vulnerable to SSH option injection — sshproxy 3.5 Low2024-05-14
CVE-2024-31485 Siemens 多款产品 命令注入漏洞 — CPCI85 Central Processing/Communication 7.2 High2024-05-14
CVE-2024-28136 PHOENIX CONTACT: command injection gains root privileges using the OCPP remote service — CHARX SEC-3000 7.8 High2024-05-14
CVE-2024-28135 PHOENIX CONTACT: command injection vulnerability in the API of the CHARX Series — CHARX SEC-3000 5.0 Medium2024-05-14
CVE-2024-4712 Arbitrary File Creation in PaperCut NG/MF Web Print Image Handler — PaperCut NG, PaperCut MF 7.8 High2024-05-14
CVE-2024-29895 Cacti command injection in cmd_realtime.php — cacti 10.0 Critical2024-05-13
CVE-2024-34352 Arbitrary file write vulnerability in 1Panel — 1Panel 6.5 Medium2024-05-09
CVE-2024-34347 @hoppscotch/cli affected by Sandbox Escape in @hoppscotch/js-sandbox leads to RCE — hoppscotch 8.4 High2024-05-08
CVE-2023-1000 cyanomiko dcnnt-py Notification notifications.py main command injection — dcnnt-py 6.3 Medium2024-04-27
CVE-2024-32884 gix-transport indirect code execution via malicious username — gitoxide 6.4 Medium2024-04-26
CVE-2024-32766 QTS, QuTS hero, QuTScloud — QTS 10.0 Critical2024-04-26
CVE-2024-3154 Cri-o: arbitrary command injection via pod annotation 7.2 High2024-04-26
CVE-2023-40146 Peplink Smart Reader 命令注入漏洞 — Smart Reader 6.8 Medium2024-04-17
CVE-2024-3908 Tenda AC500 WriteFacMac formWriteFacMac command injection — AC500 6.3 Medium2024-04-17
CVE-2024-32022 Kohya_ss is vulnerable to a command injection in basic_caption_gui.py (GHSL-2024-019) — kohya_ss 9.1 Critical2024-04-16
CVE-2024-32027 Kohya_ss is vulnerable to a command injection in `finetune_gui.py` (`GHSL-2024-022`) — kohya_ss 9.1 Critical2024-04-16
CVE-2024-32026 Kohya_ss is vulnerable to a command injection in `git_caption_gui.py` (`GHSL-2024-020`) — kohya_ss 9.1 Critical2024-04-16
CVE-2024-32025 Kohya_ss is vulnerable to a command injection in `group_images_gui.py` (`GHSL-2024-021`) — kohya_ss 9.1 Critical2024-04-16
CVE-2024-3871 Authenticated Remote Command Injection in Delta Electronics DVW — DVW-W02W2-E2 9.8 Critical2024-04-16
CVE-2024-3271 Command Injection in run-llama/llama_index — run-llama/llama_index 9.8 -2024-04-16
CVE-2024-30220 Planex MZK-MF300N 安全漏洞 — MZK-MF300N 8.8 High2024-04-15
CVE-2024-3400 PAN-OS: Arbitrary File Creation Leads to OS Command Injection Vulnerability in GlobalProtect — PAN-OS 10.0 Critical2024-04-12
CVE-2023-6999 Pods - Custom Content Types and Fields - Authenticated (Contributor+) Remote Code Execution — Pods – Custom Content Types and Fields 8.8 High2024-04-09
CVE-2024-21322 Microsoft Defender for IoT Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Microsoft Defender for IoT 7.2 High2024-04-09

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-77 (在命令中使用的特殊元素转义处理不恰当(命令注入)) represent 1185 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.