Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1000 CNY

100.0%

CWE-77 (在命令中使用的特殊元素转义处理不恰当(命令注入)) — Vulnerability Class 1185

1185 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-77 (在命令中使用的特殊元素转义处理不恰当(命令注入)). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-77 represents a critical input validation weakness where software constructs commands using untrusted data without properly sanitizing special characters. Attackers typically exploit this by injecting malicious payloads, such as semicolons or pipe operators, into user-supplied fields to alter the intended command structure. This allows them to execute arbitrary system commands, potentially leading to full system compromise, data exfiltration, or denial of service. To prevent such vulnerabilities, developers must strictly validate and sanitize all external inputs, ensuring that only expected data formats are processed. Utilizing parameterized APIs or safe command execution libraries instead of direct string concatenation significantly reduces risk. Additionally, implementing the principle of least privilege for application processes limits the potential impact of successful injection attempts, thereby enhancing overall system security against command injection attacks.

MITRE CWE Description
The product constructs all or part of a command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended command when it is sent to a downstream component. Many protocols and products have their own custom command language. While OS or shell command strings are frequently discovered and targeted, developers may not realize that these other command languages might also be vulnerable to attacks.
Common Consequences (1)
Integrity, Confidentiality, AvailabilityExecute Unauthorized Code or Commands
If a malicious user injects a character (such as a semi-colon) that delimits the end of one command and the beginning of another, it may be possible to then insert an entirely new and unrelated command that was not intended to be executed. This gives an attacker a privilege or capability that they w…
Mitigations (5)
Architecture and DesignIf at all possible, use library calls rather than external processes to recreate the desired functionality.
ImplementationIf possible, ensure that all external commands called from the program are statically created.
ImplementationAssume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range…
OperationRun time: Run time policy enforcement may be used in an allowlist fashion to prevent use of any non-sanctioned commands.
System ConfigurationAssign permissions that prevent the user from accessing/opening privileged files.
Examples (2)
Consider a "CWE Differentiator" application that uses an an LLM generative AI based "chatbot" to explain the difference between two weaknesses. As input, it accepts two CWE IDs, constructs a prompt string, sends the prompt to the chatbot, and prints the results. The prompt string effectively acts as a command to the chatbot component. Assume that invokeChatbot() calls the chatbot and returns the …
prompt = "Explain the difference between {} and {}".format(arg1, arg2) result = invokeChatbot(prompt) resultHTML = encodeForHTML(result) print resultHTML
Bad · Python
Explain the difference between CWE-77 and CWE-78
Informative
Consider the following program. It intends to perform an "ls -l" on an input filename. The validate_name() subroutine performs validation on the input to make sure that only alphanumeric and "-" characters are allowed, which avoids path traversal (CWE-22) and OS command injection (CWE-78) weaknesses. Only filenames like "abc" or "d-e-f" are intended to be allowed.
my $arg = GetArgument("filename"); do_listing($arg); sub do_listing { my($fname) = @_; if (! validate_name($fname)) { print "Error: name is not well-formed!\n"; return; } # build command my $cmd = "/bin/ls -l $fname"; system($cmd); } sub validate_name { my($name) = @_; if ($name =~ /^[\w\-]+$/) { return(1); } else { return(0); } }
Bad · Perl
if ($name =~ /^\w[\w\-]+$/) ...
Good · Perl
CVE IDTitleCVSSSeverityPublished
CVE-2024-3273 D-Link DNS-320L/DNS-325/DNS-327L/DNS-340L HTTP GET Request nas_sharing.cgi command injection — DNS-320L 7.3 High2024-04-04
CVE-2024-2947 Cockpit: command injection when deleting a sosreport with a crafted name 7.3 High2024-03-28
CVE-2024-3009 Tenda FH1205 WriteFacMac formWriteFacMac command injection — FH1205 6.3 Medium2024-03-27
CVE-2024-2991 Tenda FH1203 WriteFacMac formWriteFacMac command injection — FH1203 6.3 Medium2024-03-27
CVE-2024-1540 Command Injection in gradio-app/gradio via deploy+test-visual.yml workflow — gradio-app/gradio 7.5 -2024-03-27
CVE-2024-2982 Tenda FH1202 WriteFacMac formWriteFacMac command injection — FH1202 5.5 Medium2024-03-27
CVE-2024-24897 Remote command execution in A-Tune-Collector — A-Tune-Collector 8.1 High2024-03-25
CVE-2024-2642 Ruijie RG-NBS2009G-P EXCU_SHELL command injection — RG-NBS2009G-P 7.3 High2024-03-19
CVE-2023-41334 astropy vulnerable to RCE in TranformGraph().to_dot_graph function — astropy 8.4 High2024-03-18
CVE-2024-26204 Outlook for Android Information Disclosure Vulnerability — Microsoft Outlook for Android 7.5 High2024-03-12
CVE-2024-25998 PHOENIX CONTACT: Command injection in the OCPP Service — CHARX SEC-3000 7.3 High2024-03-12
CVE-2024-22127 Code Injection vulnerability in SAP NetWeaver AS Java (Administrator Log Viewer plug-in) — SAP NetWeaver AS Java (Administrator Log Viewer plug-in) 9.1 Critical2024-03-12
CVE-2024-2352 1Panel swap baseApi.UpdateDeviceSwap command injection — 1Panel 6.3 Medium2024-03-10
CVE-2024-0817 PaddlePaddle 命令注入漏洞 — paddlepaddle/paddle 8.4AIHighAI2024-03-07
CVE-2024-1781 Totolink X6000R AX3000 shttpd cstecgi.cgi setWizardCfg command injection — X6000R AX3000 6.3 Medium2024-02-23
CVE-2024-23346 pymatgen arbitrary code execution when parsing a maliciously crafted JonesFaithfulTransformation transformation_string — pymatgen 9.4 Critical2024-02-21
CVE-2024-22093 Appliance mode iControl REST vulnerability — BIG-IP 8.7 High2024-02-14
CVE-2024-20667 Azure DevOps Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Azure DevOps Server 2022 7.5 High2024-02-13
CVE-2023-47218 QTS, QuTS hero, QuTScloud — QTS 5.8 Medium2024-02-13
CVE-2023-46687 Emerson Rosemount GC370XA, GC700XA, GC1500XA Command Injection — Rosemount GC370XA 9.8 Critical2024-02-09
CVE-2023-49716 Emerson Rosemount GC370XA, GC700XA, GC1500XA Command Injection — Rosemount GC370XA 6.9 Medium2024-02-09
CVE-2023-47562 Photo Station — Photo Station 7.4 High2024-02-02
CVE-2023-45025 QTS, QuTS hero, QuTScloud — QTS 9.0 Critical2024-02-02
CVE-2023-41283 QTS, QuTS hero, QuTScloud — QTS 5.5 Medium2024-02-02
CVE-2023-41282 QTS, QuTS hero, QuTScloud — QTS 5.5 Medium2024-02-02
CVE-2023-41281 QTS, QuTS hero, QuTScloud — QTS 5.5 Medium2024-02-02
CVE-2024-21488 Network Utilies for Node.js 安全漏洞 — network 7.3 High2024-01-30
CVE-2024-0920 TRENDnet TEW-822DRE POST Request admin_ping.htm command injection — TEW-822DRE 7.2 High2024-01-26
CVE-2024-0919 TRENDnet TEW-815DAP POST Request do_setNTP command injection — TEW-815DAP 8.8 High2024-01-26
CVE-2024-23628 Motorola MR2600 SaveStaticRouteIPv6Params Command Injection Vulnerability — MR2600 9.0 Critical2024-01-25

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-77 (在命令中使用的特殊元素转义处理不恰当(命令注入)) represent 1185 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.