Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1000 CNY

100.0%

CWE-77 (在命令中使用的特殊元素转义处理不恰当(命令注入)) — Vulnerability Class 1185

1185 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-77 (在命令中使用的特殊元素转义处理不恰当(命令注入)). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-77 represents a critical input validation weakness where software constructs commands using untrusted data without properly sanitizing special characters. Attackers typically exploit this by injecting malicious payloads, such as semicolons or pipe operators, into user-supplied fields to alter the intended command structure. This allows them to execute arbitrary system commands, potentially leading to full system compromise, data exfiltration, or denial of service. To prevent such vulnerabilities, developers must strictly validate and sanitize all external inputs, ensuring that only expected data formats are processed. Utilizing parameterized APIs or safe command execution libraries instead of direct string concatenation significantly reduces risk. Additionally, implementing the principle of least privilege for application processes limits the potential impact of successful injection attempts, thereby enhancing overall system security against command injection attacks.

MITRE CWE Description
The product constructs all or part of a command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended command when it is sent to a downstream component. Many protocols and products have their own custom command language. While OS or shell command strings are frequently discovered and targeted, developers may not realize that these other command languages might also be vulnerable to attacks.
Common Consequences (1)
Integrity, Confidentiality, AvailabilityExecute Unauthorized Code or Commands
If a malicious user injects a character (such as a semi-colon) that delimits the end of one command and the beginning of another, it may be possible to then insert an entirely new and unrelated command that was not intended to be executed. This gives an attacker a privilege or capability that they w…
Mitigations (5)
Architecture and DesignIf at all possible, use library calls rather than external processes to recreate the desired functionality.
ImplementationIf possible, ensure that all external commands called from the program are statically created.
ImplementationAssume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range…
OperationRun time: Run time policy enforcement may be used in an allowlist fashion to prevent use of any non-sanctioned commands.
System ConfigurationAssign permissions that prevent the user from accessing/opening privileged files.
Examples (2)
Consider a "CWE Differentiator" application that uses an an LLM generative AI based "chatbot" to explain the difference between two weaknesses. As input, it accepts two CWE IDs, constructs a prompt string, sends the prompt to the chatbot, and prints the results. The prompt string effectively acts as a command to the chatbot component. Assume that invokeChatbot() calls the chatbot and returns the …
prompt = "Explain the difference between {} and {}".format(arg1, arg2) result = invokeChatbot(prompt) resultHTML = encodeForHTML(result) print resultHTML
Bad · Python
Explain the difference between CWE-77 and CWE-78
Informative
Consider the following program. It intends to perform an "ls -l" on an input filename. The validate_name() subroutine performs validation on the input to make sure that only alphanumeric and "-" characters are allowed, which avoids path traversal (CWE-22) and OS command injection (CWE-78) weaknesses. Only filenames like "abc" or "d-e-f" are intended to be allowed.
my $arg = GetArgument("filename"); do_listing($arg); sub do_listing { my($fname) = @_; if (! validate_name($fname)) { print "Error: name is not well-formed!\n"; return; } # build command my $cmd = "/bin/ls -l $fname"; system($cmd); } sub validate_name { my($name) = @_; if ($name =~ /^[\w\-]+$/) { return(1); } else { return(0); } }
Bad · Perl
if ($name =~ /^\w[\w\-]+$/) ...
Good · Perl
CVE IDTitleCVSSSeverityPublished
CVE-2024-7575 Improper neutralization special element in hyperlinks — Telerik UI for WPF 7.8 High2024-09-25
CVE-2024-7679 Improper neutralization special element in hyperlinks — Telerik UI for WinForms 7.8 High2024-09-25
CVE-2024-45066 Dover Fueling Solutions ProGauge MAGLINK LX CONSOLE Command Injection — ProGauge MAGLINK LX CONSOLE 10.0 Critical2024-09-24
CVE-2024-43693 Dover Fueling Solutions ProGauge MAGLINK LX CONSOLE Command Injection — ProGauge MAGLINK LX CONSOLE 10.0 Critical2024-09-24
CVE-2024-0005 FlashArray和FlashBlade 安全漏洞 — FlashArray 9.1 Critical2024-09-23
CVE-2024-45348 Xiaomi Router AX9000 has a post-authorization command injection vulnerability — Xiaomi Router AX9000 6.4 Medium2024-09-23
CVE-2024-45682 Millbeck Communications Proroute H685t-w Command Injection. — Proroute H685t-w 8.8 High2024-09-17
CVE-2024-8640 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command ('Command Injection') in GitLab — GitLab 8.5 High2024-09-12
CVE-2024-45824 FactoryTalk® View Site Edition Remote Code Execution Vulnerability via Lack of Input Validation — FactoryTalk View Site Edition 9.8 Critical2024-09-12
CVE-2024-38227 Microsoft SharePoint Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Microsoft SharePoint Enterprise Server 2016 7.2 High2024-09-10
CVE-2024-38228 Microsoft SharePoint Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Microsoft SharePoint Enterprise Server 2016 7.2 High2024-09-10
CVE-2024-33508 Fortinet FortiClientEMS 命令注入漏洞 — FortiClientEMS 6.9 High2024-09-10
CVE-2024-42427 Dell ThinOS 安全漏洞 — Wyse Proprietary OS (Modern ThinOS) 7.6 High2024-09-10
CVE-2024-38641 QTS, QuTS hero — QTS 8.0 -2024-09-06
CVE-2023-47563 Video Station — Video Station 7.4 High2024-09-06
CVE-2024-21903 QTS, QuTS hero — QTS 6.6 Medium2024-09-06
CVE-2024-38486 Dell SmartFabric OS10 命令注入漏洞 — SmartFabric OS10 Software 7.5 High2024-09-06
CVE-2021-38120 Remote Code Execution using Bash command Injection in backup scheduling functionality in NetIQ Advance Authentication — NetIQ Advance Authentication 5.1 Medium2024-08-28
CVE-2024-8214 D-Link DNS-1550-04 hd_config.cgi cgi_FMT_Std2R5_2nd_DiskMGR command injection — DNS-120 6.3 Medium2024-08-27
CVE-2024-8213 D-Link DNS-1550-04 hd_config.cgi cgi_FMT_R12R5_1st_DiskMGR command injection — DNS-120 6.3 Medium2024-08-27
CVE-2024-8212 D-Link DNS-1550-04 hd_config.cgi cgi_FMT_R12R5_2nd_DiskMGR command injection — DNS-120 6.3 Medium2024-08-27
CVE-2024-8211 D-Link DNS-1550-04 hd_config.cgi cgi_FMT_Std2R1_DiskMGR command injection — DNS-120 6.3 Medium2024-08-27
CVE-2024-8210 D-Link DNS-1550-04 hd_config.cgi sprintf command injection — DNS-120 6.3 Medium2024-08-27
CVE-2024-8134 D-Link DNS-1550-04 HTTP POST Request hd_config.cgi cgi_FMT_Std2R5_1st_DiskMGR command injection — DNS-120 6.3 Medium2024-08-24
CVE-2024-8133 D-Link DNS-1550-04 HTTP POST Request hd_config.cgi cgi_FMT_R5_SpareDsk_DiskMGR command injection — DNS-120 6.3 Medium2024-08-24
CVE-2024-8132 D-Link DNS-1550-04 HTTP POST Request webdav_mgr.cgi webdav_mgr command injection — DNS-120 6.3 Medium2024-08-24
CVE-2024-8131 D-Link DNS-1550-04 HTTP POST Request apkg_mgr.cgi module_enable_disable command injection — DNS-120 6.3 Medium2024-08-24
CVE-2024-8130 D-Link DNS-1550-04 HTTP POST Request s3.cgi cgi_s3 command injection — DNS-120 6.3 Medium2024-08-24
CVE-2024-8129 D-Link DNS-1550-04 HTTP POST Request s3.cgi cgi_s3_modify command injection — DNS-120 6.3 Medium2024-08-24
CVE-2024-8128 D-Link DNS-1550-04 HTTP POST Request webfile_mgr.cgi cgi_add_zip command injection — DNS-120 6.3 Medium2024-08-24

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-77 (在命令中使用的特殊元素转义处理不恰当(命令注入)) represent 1185 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.