Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1000 CNY

100.0%

CWE-77 (在命令中使用的特殊元素转义处理不恰当(命令注入)) — Vulnerability Class 1185

1185 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-77 (在命令中使用的特殊元素转义处理不恰当(命令注入)). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-77 represents a critical input validation weakness where software constructs commands using untrusted data without properly sanitizing special characters. Attackers typically exploit this by injecting malicious payloads, such as semicolons or pipe operators, into user-supplied fields to alter the intended command structure. This allows them to execute arbitrary system commands, potentially leading to full system compromise, data exfiltration, or denial of service. To prevent such vulnerabilities, developers must strictly validate and sanitize all external inputs, ensuring that only expected data formats are processed. Utilizing parameterized APIs or safe command execution libraries instead of direct string concatenation significantly reduces risk. Additionally, implementing the principle of least privilege for application processes limits the potential impact of successful injection attempts, thereby enhancing overall system security against command injection attacks.

MITRE CWE Description
The product constructs all or part of a command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended command when it is sent to a downstream component. Many protocols and products have their own custom command language. While OS or shell command strings are frequently discovered and targeted, developers may not realize that these other command languages might also be vulnerable to attacks.
Common Consequences (1)
Integrity, Confidentiality, AvailabilityExecute Unauthorized Code or Commands
If a malicious user injects a character (such as a semi-colon) that delimits the end of one command and the beginning of another, it may be possible to then insert an entirely new and unrelated command that was not intended to be executed. This gives an attacker a privilege or capability that they w…
Mitigations (5)
Architecture and DesignIf at all possible, use library calls rather than external processes to recreate the desired functionality.
ImplementationIf possible, ensure that all external commands called from the program are statically created.
ImplementationAssume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range…
OperationRun time: Run time policy enforcement may be used in an allowlist fashion to prevent use of any non-sanctioned commands.
System ConfigurationAssign permissions that prevent the user from accessing/opening privileged files.
Examples (2)
Consider a "CWE Differentiator" application that uses an an LLM generative AI based "chatbot" to explain the difference between two weaknesses. As input, it accepts two CWE IDs, constructs a prompt string, sends the prompt to the chatbot, and prints the results. The prompt string effectively acts as a command to the chatbot component. Assume that invokeChatbot() calls the chatbot and returns the …
prompt = "Explain the difference between {} and {}".format(arg1, arg2) result = invokeChatbot(prompt) resultHTML = encodeForHTML(result) print resultHTML
Bad · Python
Explain the difference between CWE-77 and CWE-78
Informative
Consider the following program. It intends to perform an "ls -l" on an input filename. The validate_name() subroutine performs validation on the input to make sure that only alphanumeric and "-" characters are allowed, which avoids path traversal (CWE-22) and OS command injection (CWE-78) weaknesses. Only filenames like "abc" or "d-e-f" are intended to be allowed.
my $arg = GetArgument("filename"); do_listing($arg); sub do_listing { my($fname) = @_; if (! validate_name($fname)) { print "Error: name is not well-formed!\n"; return; } # build command my $cmd = "/bin/ls -l $fname"; system($cmd); } sub validate_name { my($name) = @_; if ($name =~ /^[\w\-]+$/) { return(1); } else { return(0); } }
Bad · Perl
if ($name =~ /^\w[\w\-]+$/) ...
Good · Perl
CVE IDTitleCVSSSeverityPublished
CVE-2025-1338 NUUO Camera handle_config.php print_file command injection — Camera 7.3 High2025-02-16
CVE-2025-0593 SICK Lector8xx and InspectorP8xx vulnerable for code execution — SICK Lector8xx 8.8 High2025-02-14
CVE-2025-22630 WordPress Widget Options Plugin <= 4.1.0 - Arbitrary Code Execution vulnerability — Widget Options 9.9 Critical2025-02-14
CVE-2025-24861 Outback Power Mojave Inverter Command Injection — Mojave Inverter 7.5 High2025-02-13
CVE-2024-12251 Improper neutralization special element in hyperlinks — Telerik UI for WinUI 7.8 High2025-02-12
CVE-2023-5878 OneWireless command injection possible when updating firmware — OneWireless Network Wireless Device Manager 8.8 -2025-02-06
CVE-2025-23239 BIG-IP iControl REST vulnerability — BIG-IP 8.7 High2025-02-05
CVE-2024-23971 ChargePoint Home Flex OCPP bswitch Command Injection — Home Flex 8.8 High2025-01-30
CVE-2024-48841 Remote Code Execution (RCE) Vulnerabilities — FLXEON 10.0 Critical2025-01-27
CVE-2024-52325 ECOVACS robot lawnmowers and vacuums command injection — GOAT G1 9.6 Critical2025-01-23
CVE-2025-23196 Apache Ambari: Code Injection Vulnerability in Ambari Alert Definition — Apache Ambari 8.8 -2025-01-21
CVE-2024-54681 Ossur Mobile Logic Application Command Injection — Mobile Logic Application 3.5 Low2025-01-17
CVE-2025-0528 Tenda AC8/AC10/AC18 HTTP Request telnet command injection — AC8 7.2 High2025-01-17
CVE-2024-34166 WAVLINK AC3000 命令注入漏洞 — Wavlink AC3000 10.0 Critical2025-01-14
CVE-2024-39760 WAVLINK AC3000 命令注入漏洞 — Wavlink AC3000 10.0 Critical2025-01-14
CVE-2024-39761 WAVLINK AC3000 命令注入漏洞 — Wavlink AC3000 10.0 Critical2025-01-14
CVE-2024-39759 WAVLINK AC3000 命令注入漏洞 — Wavlink AC3000 10.0 Critical2025-01-14
CVE-2024-39763 WAVLINK AC3000 命令注入漏洞 — Wavlink AC3000 9.1 Critical2025-01-14
CVE-2024-39762 WAVLINK AC3000 命令注入漏洞 — Wavlink AC3000 9.1 Critical2025-01-14
CVE-2024-39764 WAVLINK AC3000 命令注入漏洞 — Wavlink AC3000 9.1 Critical2025-01-14
CVE-2024-39765 WAVLINK AC3000 命令注入漏洞 — Wavlink AC3000 9.1 Critical2025-01-14
CVE-2024-39367 WAVLINK AC3000 命令注入漏洞 — Wavlink AC3000 9.1 Critical2025-01-14
CVE-2024-39783 WAVLINK AC3000 命令注入漏洞 — Wavlink AC3000 9.1 Critical2025-01-14
CVE-2024-37186 WAVLINK AC3000 命令注入漏洞 — Wavlink AC3000 9.1 Critical2025-01-14
CVE-2024-39781 WAVLINK AC3000 命令注入漏洞 — Wavlink AC3000 9.1 Critical2025-01-14
CVE-2024-39782 WAVLINK AC3000 命令注入漏洞 — Wavlink AC3000 9.1 Critical2025-01-14
CVE-2024-39360 WAVLINK AC3000 命令注入漏洞 — Wavlink AC3000 9.1 Critical2025-01-14
CVE-2025-0396 exelban stats XPC Service shouldAcceptNewConnection command injection — stats 7.8 High2025-01-12
CVE-2025-0328 KaiYuanTong ECT Platform HTTP POST Request runCode.php command injection — ECT Platform 7.3 High2025-01-09
CVE-2022-32203 Huawei CV81-WDM FW 操作系统命令注入漏洞 — CV81-WDM FW 9.8 Critical2024-12-20

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-77 (在命令中使用的特殊元素转义处理不恰当(命令注入)) represent 1185 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.