Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1000 CNY

100.0%

CWE-121 (栈缓冲区溢出) — Vulnerability Class 2518

2518 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-121 (栈缓冲区溢出). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-121 represents a critical memory safety weakness where program data exceeds the allocated bounds of a stack-allocated buffer, corrupting adjacent memory structures. Attackers typically exploit this vulnerability by injecting malicious payloads that overwrite the function’s return address or saved frame pointer, thereby hijacking control flow to execute arbitrary code with the privileges of the compromised process. This exploitation is particularly dangerous because stack buffers are local variables, making the attack surface common in low-level languages like C and C++. Developers mitigate this risk by enforcing strict input validation, utilizing safe string handling functions that prevent unbounded writes, and adopting modern programming languages with automatic memory management. Additionally, implementing compiler-level protections such as stack canaries and Address Space Layout Randomization significantly raises the barrier for successful exploitation, ensuring system integrity remains intact against buffer overflow attempts.

MITRE CWE Description
A stack-based buffer overflow condition is a condition where the buffer being overwritten is allocated on the stack (i.e., is a local variable or, rarely, a parameter to a function).
Common Consequences (3)
AvailabilityModify Memory, DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU), DoS: Resource Consumption (Memory)
Buffer overflows generally lead to crashes. Other attacks leading to lack of availability are possible, including putting the program into an infinite loop.
Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability, Access ControlModify Memory, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands, Bypass Protection Mechanism
Buffer overflows often can be used to execute arbitrary code, which is usually outside the scope of a program's implicit security policy.
Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability, Access Control, OtherModify Memory, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands, Bypass Protection Mechanism, Other
When the consequence is arbitrary code execution, this can often be used to subvert any other security service.
Mitigations (5)
Operation, Build and CompilationUse automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index checking. D3-SFCV (Stack Frame Canary Validation) from D3FEND [REF-1334] discusses…
Effectiveness: Defense in Depth
Architecture and DesignUse an abstraction library to abstract away risky APIs. Not a complete solution.
ImplementationImplement and perform bounds checking on input.
ImplementationDo not use dangerous functions such as gets. Use safer, equivalent functions which check for boundary errors.
Operation, Build and CompilationRun or compile the software using features or extensions that randomly arrange the positions of a program's executable and libraries in memory. Because this makes the addresses unpredictable, it can prevent an attacker from reliably jumping to exploitable code. Examples include Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) [REF-58] [REF-60] and Position-Independent Executables (PIE) [REF-64]. Imported…
Effectiveness: Defense in Depth
Examples (2)
While buffer overflow examples can be rather complex, it is possible to have very simple, yet still exploitable, stack-based buffer overflows:
#define BUFSIZE 256 int main(int argc, char **argv) { char buf[BUFSIZE]; strcpy(buf, argv[1]); }
Bad · C
This example takes an IP address from a user, verifies that it is well formed and then looks up the hostname and copies it into a buffer.
void host_lookup(char *user_supplied_addr){ struct hostent *hp; in_addr_t *addr; char hostname[64]; in_addr_t inet_addr(const char *cp); /*routine that ensures user_supplied_addr is in the right format for conversion */ validate_addr_form(user_supplied_addr); addr = inet_addr(user_supplied_addr); hp = gethostbyaddr( addr, sizeof(struct in_addr), AF_INET); strcpy(hostname, hp->h_name); }
Bad · C
CVE IDTitleCVSSSeverityPublished
CVE-2026-30980 iccDEV has a stack overflow in CIccBasicStructFactory::CreateStruct() — iccDEV 5.5 Medium2026-03-10
CVE-2026-24640 Fortinet FortiWeb 安全漏洞 — FortiWeb 5.9 Medium2026-03-10
CVE-2025-54820 Fortinet FortiManager 安全漏洞 — FortiManager 7.0 High2026-03-10
CVE-2026-30897 Fortinet FortiWeb 安全漏洞 — FortiWeb 5.9 Medium2026-03-10
CVE-2026-25570 Siemens SICAM SIAPP SDK 安全漏洞 — SICAM SIAPP SDK 7.4 High2026-03-10
CVE-2026-30929 ImageMagick has a stack buffer overflow in MagnifyImage — ImageMagick 7.7 High2026-03-09
CVE-2026-28690 ImageMagick has a stack write buffer overflow in MNG encoder — ImageMagick 6.9 Medium2026-03-09
CVE-2026-28494 ImageMagick affected by stack corruption through long morphology kernel names or arrays — ImageMagick 7.1 High2026-03-09
CVE-2026-3811 Tenda FH1202 P2pListFilter fromP2pListFilter stack-based overflow — FH1202 8.8 High2026-03-09
CVE-2026-3810 Tenda FH1202 DhcpListClient fromDhcpListClient stack-based overflow — FH1202 8.8 High2026-03-09
CVE-2026-3809 Tenda FH1202 NatSaticSetting fromNatStaticSetting stack-based overflow — FH1202 8.8 High2026-03-09
CVE-2026-3808 Tenda FH1202 webtypelibrary formWebTypeLibrary stack-based overflow — FH1202 8.8 High2026-03-09
CVE-2026-3807 Tenda FH1202 AdvSetWrlsafeset formWrlsafeset stack-based overflow — FH1202 8.8 High2026-03-09
CVE-2026-3823 Atop Technologies|EHG2408 series switch - Stack-based Buffer Overflow — EHG2408 8.8 High2026-03-09
CVE-2026-3804 Tenda i3 WifiMacFilterSet formWifiMacFilterSet stack-based overflow — i3 8.8 High2026-03-09
CVE-2026-3803 Tenda i3 WifiMacFilterGet formWifiMacFilterGet stack-based overflow — i3 8.8 High2026-03-09
CVE-2026-3802 Tenda i3 exeCommand formexeCommand stack-based overflow — i3 8.8 High2026-03-09
CVE-2026-3801 Tenda i3 setAutoPing formSetAutoPing stack-based overflow — i3 8.8 High2026-03-09
CVE-2026-3799 Tenda i3 setcfm formSetCfm stack-based overflow — i3 8.8 High2026-03-09
CVE-2026-3769 Tenda F453 WrlclientSet stack-based overflow — F453 8.8 High2026-03-08
CVE-2026-3768 Tenda F453 WrlExtraSet formWrlExtraSet stack-based overflow — F453 8.8 High2026-03-08
CVE-2026-3732 Tenda F453 exeCommand strcpy stack-based overflow — F453 8.8 High2026-03-08
CVE-2026-3729 Tenda F453 PPTPDClient fromPptpUserAdd stack-based overflow — F453 8.8 High2026-03-08
CVE-2026-3728 Tenda F453 setcfm fromSetCfm stack-based overflow — F453 8.8 High2026-03-08
CVE-2026-3727 Tenda F453 QuickIndex sub_3C6C0 stack-based overflow — F453 8.8 High2026-03-08
CVE-2026-3726 Tenda F453 webExcptypemanFilter fromwebExcptypemanFilter stack-based overflow — F453 8.8 High2026-03-08
CVE-2026-3715 Wavlink WL-WN579X3-C firewall.cgi sub_40139C stack-based overflow — WL-WN579X3-C 8.8 High2026-03-08
CVE-2026-3697 Planet ICG-2510 Language Package Configuration httpd sub_40C8E4 stack-based overflow — ICG-2510 6.3 Medium2026-03-08
CVE-2026-3679 Tenda FH451 QuickIndex formQuickIndex stack-based overflow — FH451 8.8 High2026-03-07
CVE-2026-3678 Tenda FH451 AdvSetWan sub_3C434 stack-based overflow — FH451 8.8 High2026-03-07

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-121 (栈缓冲区溢出) represent 2518 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.