Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1000 CNY

100.0%

CWE-121 (栈缓冲区溢出) — Vulnerability Class 2516

2516 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-121 (栈缓冲区溢出). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-121 represents a critical memory safety weakness where program data exceeds the allocated bounds of a stack-allocated buffer, corrupting adjacent memory structures. Attackers typically exploit this vulnerability by injecting malicious payloads that overwrite the function’s return address or saved frame pointer, thereby hijacking control flow to execute arbitrary code with the privileges of the compromised process. This exploitation is particularly dangerous because stack buffers are local variables, making the attack surface common in low-level languages like C and C++. Developers mitigate this risk by enforcing strict input validation, utilizing safe string handling functions that prevent unbounded writes, and adopting modern programming languages with automatic memory management. Additionally, implementing compiler-level protections such as stack canaries and Address Space Layout Randomization significantly raises the barrier for successful exploitation, ensuring system integrity remains intact against buffer overflow attempts.

MITRE CWE Description
A stack-based buffer overflow condition is a condition where the buffer being overwritten is allocated on the stack (i.e., is a local variable or, rarely, a parameter to a function).
Common Consequences (3)
AvailabilityModify Memory, DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU), DoS: Resource Consumption (Memory)
Buffer overflows generally lead to crashes. Other attacks leading to lack of availability are possible, including putting the program into an infinite loop.
Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability, Access ControlModify Memory, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands, Bypass Protection Mechanism
Buffer overflows often can be used to execute arbitrary code, which is usually outside the scope of a program's implicit security policy.
Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability, Access Control, OtherModify Memory, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands, Bypass Protection Mechanism, Other
When the consequence is arbitrary code execution, this can often be used to subvert any other security service.
Mitigations (5)
Operation, Build and CompilationUse automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index checking. D3-SFCV (Stack Frame Canary Validation) from D3FEND [REF-1334] discusses…
Effectiveness: Defense in Depth
Architecture and DesignUse an abstraction library to abstract away risky APIs. Not a complete solution.
ImplementationImplement and perform bounds checking on input.
ImplementationDo not use dangerous functions such as gets. Use safer, equivalent functions which check for boundary errors.
Operation, Build and CompilationRun or compile the software using features or extensions that randomly arrange the positions of a program's executable and libraries in memory. Because this makes the addresses unpredictable, it can prevent an attacker from reliably jumping to exploitable code. Examples include Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) [REF-58] [REF-60] and Position-Independent Executables (PIE) [REF-64]. Imported…
Effectiveness: Defense in Depth
Examples (2)
While buffer overflow examples can be rather complex, it is possible to have very simple, yet still exploitable, stack-based buffer overflows:
#define BUFSIZE 256 int main(int argc, char **argv) { char buf[BUFSIZE]; strcpy(buf, argv[1]); }
Bad · C
This example takes an IP address from a user, verifies that it is well formed and then looks up the hostname and copies it into a buffer.
void host_lookup(char *user_supplied_addr){ struct hostent *hp; in_addr_t *addr; char hostname[64]; in_addr_t inet_addr(const char *cp); /*routine that ensures user_supplied_addr is in the right format for conversion */ validate_addr_form(user_supplied_addr); addr = inet_addr(user_supplied_addr); hp = gethostbyaddr( addr, sizeof(struct in_addr), AF_INET); strcpy(hostname, hp->h_name); }
Bad · C
CVE IDTitleCVSSSeverityPublished
CVE-2018-10494 Foxit Reader 缓冲区错误漏洞 — Foxit Reader 8.8 -2018-05-17
CVE-2018-7499 多款Advantech产品缓冲区错误漏洞 — WebAccess 9.8 -2018-05-15
CVE-2018-7494 Delta Electronics WPLSoft 缓冲区错误漏洞 — Delta Electronics WPLSoft 8.8 -2018-05-04
CVE-2018-8865 Lantech IDS 2102 缓冲区错误漏洞 — IDS 2102 9.8 -2018-05-04
CVE-2018-8839 Delta PMSoft 缓冲区错误漏洞 — PMSoft 7.8 -2018-04-30
CVE-2018-7527 WECON LeviStudio HMI Editor和PI Studio HMI Project Programmer 缓冲区错误漏洞 — LeviStudio HMI Editor 7.8 -2018-04-26
CVE-2018-8840 Schneider Electric InduSoft Web Studio和InTouch Machine Edition 缓冲区错误漏洞 — Schneider Electric InduSoft Web Studio and InTouch Machine Edition 9.8 -2018-04-18
CVE-2018-7514 Omron CX-One多个软件缓冲区错误漏洞 — Omron CX-One 7.3 -2018-04-17
CVE-2017-9638 Mitsubishi Electric E-Designer 缓冲区错误漏洞 — E-Designer 9.8 -2018-04-17
CVE-2018-7513 Omron CX-Supervisor 缓冲区错误漏洞 — Omron CX-Supervisor 5.3 -2018-03-21
CVE-2017-16751 Delta Industrial Automation Screen Editor 缓冲区错误漏洞 — Delta Electronics Delta Industrial Automation Screen Editor 7.8 -2018-03-15
CVE-2018-5476 Delta Electronics Delta Industrial Automation DOPSoft 缓冲区错误漏洞 — Delta Electronics Delta Industrial Automation DOPSoft 7.8 -2018-03-15
CVE-2017-12194 Red Hat spice-gtk 安全漏洞 — spice-gtk 8.8 -2018-03-14
CVE-2018-1071 zsh 缓冲区错误漏洞 — zsh 5.5 -2018-03-09
CVE-2018-5452 Emerson Process Management ControlWave Micro Process Automation Controller 缓冲区错误漏洞 — Emerson ControlWave Micro Process Automation Controller 7.5 -2018-03-07
CVE-2018-5475 GE D60 Line Distance Relay devices 缓冲区错误漏洞 — GE D60 Line Distance Relay 9.8 -2018-02-19
CVE-2018-5440 3S-Smart CODESYS和CODESYS runtime system 缓冲区错误漏洞 — 3S-Smart Software Solutions GmbH CODESYS Web Server 9.8 -2018-02-15
CVE-2018-1161 Quest NetVault Backup 输入验证漏洞 — Quest NetVault Backup 9.8 -2018-02-08
CVE-2018-5442 Fuji Electric V-Server VPR 缓冲区错误漏洞 — Fuji Electric V-Server VPR 9.8 -2018-02-05
CVE-2017-16739 WECON Technology LEVI Studio HMI Editor 缓冲区错误漏洞 — WECON Technology Co., Ltd. LeviStudio HMI Editor 7.8 -2018-01-12
CVE-2017-16724 Advantech WebAccess 缓冲区错误漏洞 — Advantech WebAccess 9.8 -2018-01-05
CVE-2017-3193 D-Link DIR-850L 缓冲区错误漏洞 — DIR-850L and potentially others 9.8 -2017-12-15
CVE-2017-3195 Commvault Edge Communication Service 缓冲区错误漏洞 — Service Pack 6 9.8 -2017-12-15
CVE-2017-15088 MIT Kerberos 5 安全漏洞 — krb5 1.5 9.8 -2017-11-23
CVE-2017-14016 Advantech WebAccess 缓冲区错误漏洞 — Advantech WebAccess 8.8 -2017-11-06
CVE-2017-13089 GNU Wget: stack overflow in HTTP protocol handling — Wget 8.8 -2017-10-27
CVE-2017-13999 Wecon LEVI Studio HMI Editor 缓冲区错误漏洞 — WECON Technology Co., Ltd. LeviStudio HMI Editor 9.8 -2017-10-17
CVE-2017-12188 Linux kernel 路径遍历漏洞 — Linux kernel 7.8 -2017-10-11
CVE-2017-12732 GE CIMPLICITY 缓冲区错误漏洞 — GE CIMPLICITY 7.1 -2017-10-05
CVE-2017-12706 Advantech WebAccess 缓冲区错误漏洞 — Advantech WebAccess 9.8 -2017-08-30

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-121 (栈缓冲区溢出) represent 2516 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.