Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1000 CNY

100.0%

CWE-121 (栈缓冲区溢出) — Vulnerability Class 2518

2518 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-121 (栈缓冲区溢出). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-121 represents a critical memory safety weakness where program data exceeds the allocated bounds of a stack-allocated buffer, corrupting adjacent memory structures. Attackers typically exploit this vulnerability by injecting malicious payloads that overwrite the function’s return address or saved frame pointer, thereby hijacking control flow to execute arbitrary code with the privileges of the compromised process. This exploitation is particularly dangerous because stack buffers are local variables, making the attack surface common in low-level languages like C and C++. Developers mitigate this risk by enforcing strict input validation, utilizing safe string handling functions that prevent unbounded writes, and adopting modern programming languages with automatic memory management. Additionally, implementing compiler-level protections such as stack canaries and Address Space Layout Randomization significantly raises the barrier for successful exploitation, ensuring system integrity remains intact against buffer overflow attempts.

MITRE CWE Description
A stack-based buffer overflow condition is a condition where the buffer being overwritten is allocated on the stack (i.e., is a local variable or, rarely, a parameter to a function).
Common Consequences (3)
AvailabilityModify Memory, DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU), DoS: Resource Consumption (Memory)
Buffer overflows generally lead to crashes. Other attacks leading to lack of availability are possible, including putting the program into an infinite loop.
Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability, Access ControlModify Memory, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands, Bypass Protection Mechanism
Buffer overflows often can be used to execute arbitrary code, which is usually outside the scope of a program's implicit security policy.
Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability, Access Control, OtherModify Memory, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands, Bypass Protection Mechanism, Other
When the consequence is arbitrary code execution, this can often be used to subvert any other security service.
Mitigations (5)
Operation, Build and CompilationUse automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index checking. D3-SFCV (Stack Frame Canary Validation) from D3FEND [REF-1334] discusses…
Effectiveness: Defense in Depth
Architecture and DesignUse an abstraction library to abstract away risky APIs. Not a complete solution.
ImplementationImplement and perform bounds checking on input.
ImplementationDo not use dangerous functions such as gets. Use safer, equivalent functions which check for boundary errors.
Operation, Build and CompilationRun or compile the software using features or extensions that randomly arrange the positions of a program's executable and libraries in memory. Because this makes the addresses unpredictable, it can prevent an attacker from reliably jumping to exploitable code. Examples include Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) [REF-58] [REF-60] and Position-Independent Executables (PIE) [REF-64]. Imported…
Effectiveness: Defense in Depth
Examples (2)
While buffer overflow examples can be rather complex, it is possible to have very simple, yet still exploitable, stack-based buffer overflows:
#define BUFSIZE 256 int main(int argc, char **argv) { char buf[BUFSIZE]; strcpy(buf, argv[1]); }
Bad · C
This example takes an IP address from a user, verifies that it is well formed and then looks up the hostname and copies it into a buffer.
void host_lookup(char *user_supplied_addr){ struct hostent *hp; in_addr_t *addr; char hostname[64]; in_addr_t inet_addr(const char *cp); /*routine that ensures user_supplied_addr is in the right format for conversion */ validate_addr_form(user_supplied_addr); addr = inet_addr(user_supplied_addr); hp = gethostbyaddr( addr, sizeof(struct in_addr), AF_INET); strcpy(hostname, hp->h_name); }
Bad · C
CVE IDTitleCVSSSeverityPublished
CVE-2026-22923 Siemens NX 安全漏洞 — NX 7.8 High2026-02-10
CVE-2026-22904 Stack Overflow via Oversized Cookie Fields in lighttpd — 0852-1322 9.8 Critical2026-02-09
CVE-2026-22903 Stack Overflow via SESSIONID Cookie in lighttpd — 0852-1322 9.8 Critical2026-02-09
CVE-2026-2192 Tenda AC9 formGetRebootTimer stack-based overflow — AC9 7.2 High2026-02-08
CVE-2026-2191 Tenda AC9 formGetDdosDefenceList stack-based overflow — AC9 7.2 High2026-02-08
CVE-2026-2187 Tenda RX3 formSetQosBand set_qosMib_list stack-based overflow — RX3 8.8 High2026-02-08
CVE-2026-2186 Tenda RX3 SetIpMacBind fromSetIpMacBind stack-based overflow — RX3 8.8 High2026-02-08
CVE-2026-2185 Tenda RX3 MAC Filtering Configuration Endpoint setBlackRule set_device_name stack-based overflow — RX3 8.8 High2026-02-08
CVE-2026-2181 Tenda RX3 openSchedWifi stack-based overflow — RX3 8.8 High2026-02-08
CVE-2026-2180 Tenda RX3 fast_setting_wifi_set stack-based overflow — RX3 8.8 High2026-02-08
CVE-2020-37161 Wedding Slideshow Studio 1.36 - 'Name' Buffer Overflow — Wedding Slideshow Studio 9.8 Critical2026-02-06
CVE-2020-37159 Cuckoo Clock 5.0 - Buffer Overflow — Cuckoo Clock 9.8 Critical2026-02-06
CVE-2020-37122 SpotFTP-FTP Password Recover 2.4.8 - Denial of Service — FTP Password Recover 7.5 High2026-02-06
CVE-2020-37095 Cyberoam Authentication Client 2.1.2.7 - Buffer Overflow (SEH) — Cyberoam Authentication Client 9.8 Critical2026-02-06
CVE-2026-2069 ggml-org llama.cpp GBNF Grammar llama-grammar.cpp llama_grammar_advance_stack stack-based overflow — llama.cpp 3.3 Low2026-02-06
CVE-2026-25727 time affected by a stack exhaustion denial of service attack — time 7.5AIHighAI2026-02-06
CVE-2026-2017 IP-COM W30AP POST Request wx3auth R7WebsSecurityHandler stack-based overflow — W30AP 9.8 Critical2026-02-06
CVE-2026-2016 happyfish100 libfastcommon base64.c base64_decode stack-based overflow — libfastcommon 5.3 Medium2026-02-06
CVE-2020-37142 10-Strike Network Inventory Explorer 8.54 - 'Add' Local Buffer Overflow (SEH) — Network Inventory Explorer 8.4 High2026-02-05
CVE-2020-37138 10-Strike Network Inventory Explorer 9.03 - 'Read from File' Buffer Overflow (SEH)(ROP) — Network Inventory Explorer 9.8 Critical2026-02-05
CVE-2020-37136 ZOC Terminal v7.25.5 - 'Private key file' Denial of Service — ZOC Terminal 7.5 High2026-02-05
CVE-2020-37133 UltraVNC Launcher 1.2.4.0 - 'RepeaterHost' Denial of Service — UltraVNC Launcher 7.5 High2026-02-05
CVE-2020-37132 UltraVNC Launcher 1.2.4.0 - 'Password' Denial of Service — UltraVNC Launcher 6.2 Medium2026-02-05
CVE-2020-37127 dnsmasq-utils 2.79-1 - 'dhcp_release' Denial of Service — dnsmasq-utils 5.5 Medium2026-02-05
CVE-2020-37128 ZOC Terminal 7.25.5 - 'Script' Denial of Service — ZOC Terminal 6.2 Medium2026-02-05
CVE-2020-37126 Free Desktop Clock x86 Venetian Blinds Zipper 3.0 - Unicode Stack Overflow (SEH) — Free Desktop Clock 9.8 Critical2026-02-05
CVE-2020-37124 B64dec 1.1.2 - Buffer Overflow (SEH Overflow + Egg Hunter) — B64dec 9.8 Critical2026-02-05
CVE-2020-37120 Rubo DICOM Viewer 2.0 - Buffer Overflow (SEH) — Rubo DICOM Viewer 9.8 Critical2026-02-05
CVE-2020-37121 CODE::BLOCKS 16.01 - Buffer Overflow (SEH) UNICODE — Code::Blocks 5.5 Medium2026-02-05
CVE-2020-37119 Nsauditor 3.2.1.0 - Buffer Overflow (SEH+ASLR bypass (3 bytes overwrite)) — Nsauditor 9.8 Critical2026-02-05

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-121 (栈缓冲区溢出) represent 2518 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.