Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1000 CNY

100.0%

CWE-121 (栈缓冲区溢出) — Vulnerability Class 2518

2518 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-121 (栈缓冲区溢出). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-121 represents a critical memory safety weakness where program data exceeds the allocated bounds of a stack-allocated buffer, corrupting adjacent memory structures. Attackers typically exploit this vulnerability by injecting malicious payloads that overwrite the function’s return address or saved frame pointer, thereby hijacking control flow to execute arbitrary code with the privileges of the compromised process. This exploitation is particularly dangerous because stack buffers are local variables, making the attack surface common in low-level languages like C and C++. Developers mitigate this risk by enforcing strict input validation, utilizing safe string handling functions that prevent unbounded writes, and adopting modern programming languages with automatic memory management. Additionally, implementing compiler-level protections such as stack canaries and Address Space Layout Randomization significantly raises the barrier for successful exploitation, ensuring system integrity remains intact against buffer overflow attempts.

MITRE CWE Description
A stack-based buffer overflow condition is a condition where the buffer being overwritten is allocated on the stack (i.e., is a local variable or, rarely, a parameter to a function).
Common Consequences (3)
AvailabilityModify Memory, DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU), DoS: Resource Consumption (Memory)
Buffer overflows generally lead to crashes. Other attacks leading to lack of availability are possible, including putting the program into an infinite loop.
Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability, Access ControlModify Memory, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands, Bypass Protection Mechanism
Buffer overflows often can be used to execute arbitrary code, which is usually outside the scope of a program's implicit security policy.
Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability, Access Control, OtherModify Memory, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands, Bypass Protection Mechanism, Other
When the consequence is arbitrary code execution, this can often be used to subvert any other security service.
Mitigations (5)
Operation, Build and CompilationUse automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index checking. D3-SFCV (Stack Frame Canary Validation) from D3FEND [REF-1334] discusses…
Effectiveness: Defense in Depth
Architecture and DesignUse an abstraction library to abstract away risky APIs. Not a complete solution.
ImplementationImplement and perform bounds checking on input.
ImplementationDo not use dangerous functions such as gets. Use safer, equivalent functions which check for boundary errors.
Operation, Build and CompilationRun or compile the software using features or extensions that randomly arrange the positions of a program's executable and libraries in memory. Because this makes the addresses unpredictable, it can prevent an attacker from reliably jumping to exploitable code. Examples include Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) [REF-58] [REF-60] and Position-Independent Executables (PIE) [REF-64]. Imported…
Effectiveness: Defense in Depth
Examples (2)
While buffer overflow examples can be rather complex, it is possible to have very simple, yet still exploitable, stack-based buffer overflows:
#define BUFSIZE 256 int main(int argc, char **argv) { char buf[BUFSIZE]; strcpy(buf, argv[1]); }
Bad · C
This example takes an IP address from a user, verifies that it is well formed and then looks up the hostname and copies it into a buffer.
void host_lookup(char *user_supplied_addr){ struct hostent *hp; in_addr_t *addr; char hostname[64]; in_addr_t inet_addr(const char *cp); /*routine that ensures user_supplied_addr is in the right format for conversion */ validate_addr_form(user_supplied_addr); addr = inet_addr(user_supplied_addr); hp = gethostbyaddr( addr, sizeof(struct in_addr), AF_INET); strcpy(hostname, hp->h_name); }
Bad · C
CVE IDTitleCVSSSeverityPublished
CVE-2026-2567 Wavlink WL-NU516U1 nas.cgi sub_401218 stack-based overflow — WL-NU516U1 7.2 High2026-02-16
CVE-2026-2566 Wavlink WL-NU516U1 adm.cgi sub_406194 stack-based overflow — WL-NU516U1 7.2 High2026-02-16
CVE-2026-2565 Wavlink WL-NU516U1 adm.cgi sub_40785C stack-based overflow — WL-NU516U1 6.6 Medium2026-02-16
CVE-2025-32062 Stack Buffer Overflow leading to RCE in Bluetooth stack of Infotainment ECU — Infotainment system ECU 8.8 High2026-02-15
CVE-2025-32061 Stack Buffer Overflow leading to RCE in Bluetooth stack of Infotainment ECU — Infotainment system ECU 8.8 High2026-02-15
CVE-2025-32059 Stack Buffer Overflow leading to RCE in Bluetooth stack of Infotainment ECU — Infotainment system ECU 8.8 High2026-02-15
CVE-2025-32058 Stack Overflow in processing requests over INC interface on RH850 side of Infotainment ECU — Infotainment system ECU 9.3 Critical2026-02-15
CVE-2026-26269 Vim has a Netbeans specialKeys Stack Buffer Overflow — vim 5.4 Medium2026-02-13
CVE-2019-25341 iNetTools for iOS 8.20 - 'Whois' Denial of Service — iNetTools for iOS 7.5 High2026-02-12
CVE-2019-25340 SpotAuditor 5.3.2 - 'Base64' Denial Of Service — Nsauditor SpotAuditor 7.5 High2026-02-12
CVE-2019-25339 GHIA CamIP 1.2 for iOS - 'Password' Denial of Service — GHIA CamIP 7.5 High2026-02-12
CVE-2019-25336 SpotAuditor 5.3.2 - 'Base64' Local Buffer Overflow (SEH) — Nsauditor SpotAuditor 8.4 High2026-02-12
CVE-2019-25334 Product Key Explorer 4.2.0.0 - 'Name' Denial of Service — Nsauditor Product Key Explorer 6.2 Medium2026-02-12
CVE-2019-25332 FTP Commander Pro 8.03 - Local Stack Overflow — FTP Commander Pro 8.4 High2026-02-12
CVE-2019-25330 SurfOffline Professional 2.2.0.103 - 'Project Name' Denial of Service (SEH) — SurfOffline Professional 7.5 High2026-02-12
CVE-2019-25331 AVS Audio Converter 9.1 - 'Exit folder' Buffer Overflow — AVS Audio Converter 8.4 High2026-02-12
CVE-2019-25329 FTP Navigator 8.03 - 'Custom Command' Denial of Service (SEH) — FTP Navigator 7.5 High2026-02-12
CVE-2019-25328 XnConvert 1.82 - Denial of Service — XnConvert 7.5 High2026-02-12
CVE-2019-25321 FTP Navigator 8.03 - Stack Overflow (SEH) — FTP Navigator 9.8 Critical2026-02-12
CVE-2019-25319 Domain Quester Pro 6.02 - Stack Overflow (SEH) — Domain Quester Pro 9.8 Critical2026-02-12
CVE-2019-25318 AVS Audio Converter 9.1.2.600 - Stack Overflow — AVS Audio Converter 8.8 High2026-02-12
CVE-2020-37200 NetShareWatcher 1.5.8.0 - 'Key' Denial of Service — Nsauditor NetShareWatcher 7.5 High2026-02-11
CVE-2020-37198 Duplicate Cleaner Pro 4 - Denial of Service — Duplicate Cleaner Pro 7.5 High2026-02-11
CVE-2020-37184 Allok Video Converter 4.6.1217 - Stack Overflow (SEH) — Allok Video Converter 9.8 Critical2026-02-11
CVE-2020-37183 Allok RM RMVB to AVI MPEG DVD Converter 3.6.1217 - Stack Overflow (SEH) — Allok RM RMVB to AVI MPEG DVD Converter 9.8 Critical2026-02-11
CVE-2020-37181 Torrent FLV Converter 1.51 Build 117 - Stack Oveflow (SEH partial overwrite) — Torrent FLV Converter 9.8 Critical2026-02-11
CVE-2020-37182 Redir 3.3 - Denial of Service — Redir 7.5 High2026-02-11
CVE-2020-37177 BOOTP Turbo 2.0 - Denial of Service (SEH) — BOOTP Turbo 7.5 High2026-02-11
CVE-2020-37176 Torrent 3GP Converter 1.51 - Stack Overflow (SEH) — Torrent 3GP Converter 9.8 Critical2026-02-11
CVE-2025-29951 AMD多款产品 安全漏洞 — AMD Athlon™ 3000 Series Mobile Processors with Radeon™ Graphics 7.8AIHighAI2026-02-10

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-121 (栈缓冲区溢出) represent 2518 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.