Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1000 CNY

100.0%

CWE-121 (栈缓冲区溢出) — Vulnerability Class 2531

2531 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-121 (栈缓冲区溢出). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-121 represents a critical memory safety weakness where program data exceeds the allocated bounds of a stack-allocated buffer, corrupting adjacent memory structures. Attackers typically exploit this vulnerability by injecting malicious payloads that overwrite the function’s return address or saved frame pointer, thereby hijacking control flow to execute arbitrary code with the privileges of the compromised process. This exploitation is particularly dangerous because stack buffers are local variables, making the attack surface common in low-level languages like C and C++. Developers mitigate this risk by enforcing strict input validation, utilizing safe string handling functions that prevent unbounded writes, and adopting modern programming languages with automatic memory management. Additionally, implementing compiler-level protections such as stack canaries and Address Space Layout Randomization significantly raises the barrier for successful exploitation, ensuring system integrity remains intact against buffer overflow attempts.

MITRE CWE Description
A stack-based buffer overflow condition is a condition where the buffer being overwritten is allocated on the stack (i.e., is a local variable or, rarely, a parameter to a function).
Common Consequences (3)
AvailabilityModify Memory, DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU), DoS: Resource Consumption (Memory)
Buffer overflows generally lead to crashes. Other attacks leading to lack of availability are possible, including putting the program into an infinite loop.
Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability, Access ControlModify Memory, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands, Bypass Protection Mechanism
Buffer overflows often can be used to execute arbitrary code, which is usually outside the scope of a program's implicit security policy.
Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability, Access Control, OtherModify Memory, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands, Bypass Protection Mechanism, Other
When the consequence is arbitrary code execution, this can often be used to subvert any other security service.
Mitigations (5)
Operation, Build and CompilationUse automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index checking. D3-SFCV (Stack Frame Canary Validation) from D3FEND [REF-1334] discusses…
Effectiveness: Defense in Depth
Architecture and DesignUse an abstraction library to abstract away risky APIs. Not a complete solution.
ImplementationImplement and perform bounds checking on input.
ImplementationDo not use dangerous functions such as gets. Use safer, equivalent functions which check for boundary errors.
Operation, Build and CompilationRun or compile the software using features or extensions that randomly arrange the positions of a program's executable and libraries in memory. Because this makes the addresses unpredictable, it can prevent an attacker from reliably jumping to exploitable code. Examples include Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) [REF-58] [REF-60] and Position-Independent Executables (PIE) [REF-64]. Imported…
Effectiveness: Defense in Depth
Examples (2)
While buffer overflow examples can be rather complex, it is possible to have very simple, yet still exploitable, stack-based buffer overflows:
#define BUFSIZE 256 int main(int argc, char **argv) { char buf[BUFSIZE]; strcpy(buf, argv[1]); }
Bad · C
This example takes an IP address from a user, verifies that it is well formed and then looks up the hostname and copies it into a buffer.
void host_lookup(char *user_supplied_addr){ struct hostent *hp; in_addr_t *addr; char hostname[64]; in_addr_t inet_addr(const char *cp); /*routine that ensures user_supplied_addr is in the right format for conversion */ validate_addr_form(user_supplied_addr); addr = inet_addr(user_supplied_addr); hp = gethostbyaddr( addr, sizeof(struct in_addr), AF_INET); strcpy(hostname, hp->h_name); }
Bad · C
CVE IDTitleCVSSSeverityPublished
CVE-2023-27355 Sonos One Speaker 安全漏洞 — One Speaker 8.8 -2023-04-20
CVE-2023-26412 ZDI-CAN-20314: Adobe Substance 3D Designer USDA File Parsing Stack-based Buffer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Substance3D - Designer 7.8 High2023-04-13
CVE-2023-26383 ZDI-CAN-20287: Adobe Substance 3D Stager USDA File Parsing Stack-based Buffer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Substance3D - Stager 7.8 High2023-04-12
CVE-2023-26390 ZDI-CAN-20255: Adobe Substance 3D Stager USDA File Parsing Stack-based Buffer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Substance3D - Stager 7.8 High2023-04-12
CVE-2022-27646 NETGEAR R6700v3 授权问题漏洞 — R6700v3 8.8 -2023-03-29
CVE-2022-27648 KOYO Screen Creator 安全漏洞 — Screen Creator 7.8 -2023-03-29
CVE-2022-2825 Kepware KEPServerEX 安全漏洞 — KEPServerEX 9.8 -2023-03-29
CVE-2022-28304 Bentley Systems MicroStation 缓冲区错误漏洞 — MicroStation CONNECT 7.8 -2023-03-29
CVE-2022-28305 Bentley Systems MicroStation 缓冲区错误漏洞 — MicroStation CONNECT 7.8 -2023-03-29
CVE-2022-28306 Bentley Systems MicroStation 缓冲区错误漏洞 — MicroStation CONNECT 7.8 -2023-03-29
CVE-2022-28315 Bentley Systems MicroStation 代码注入漏洞 — MicroStation CONNECT 7.8 -2023-03-29
CVE-2022-43613 Corel CorelDRAW Graphics Suite 安全漏洞 — CorelDRAW Graphics Suite 7.8 -2023-03-29
CVE-2022-43622 D-Link DIR-1935 安全漏洞 — DIR-1935 8.8 -2023-03-29
CVE-2022-43625 D-Link DIR-1935 安全漏洞 — DIR-1935 6.8 -2023-03-29
CVE-2022-43630 D-Link DIR-1935 安全漏洞 — DIR-1935 8.8 -2023-03-29
CVE-2022-0194 Netatalk 安全漏洞 — Netatalk 9.8 -2023-03-28
CVE-2022-0650 TP-Link TL-WR940N 缓冲区错误漏洞 — TL-WR940N 8.0 -2023-03-28
CVE-2022-23122 Netatalk 安全漏洞 — Netatalk 9.8 -2023-03-28
CVE-2022-23125 Netatalk 安全漏洞 — Netatalk 9.8 -2023-03-28
CVE-2022-24673 Canon imageCLASS MF644Cdw 10.02 printers 缓冲区错误漏洞 — imageCLASS MF644Cdw 9.8 -2023-03-28
CVE-2022-24674 Canon imageCLASS MF644Cdw 10.02 printers缓冲区错误漏洞 — imageCLASS MF644Cdw 8.8 -2023-03-28
CVE-2022-24973 TP-Link TL-WR940N 安全漏洞 — TL-WR940N 8.0 -2023-03-28
CVE-2023-26337 ZDI-CAN-20285: Adobe Dimension USDA File Parsing Stack-based Buffer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Dimension 7.8 High2023-03-28
CVE-2023-1646 IObit Malware Fighter IOCTL IMFCameraProtect.sys 0x8018E004 stack-based overflow — Malware Fighter 5.3 Medium2023-03-26
CVE-2023-27590 Rizin has stack-based buffer overflow when parsing GDB registers profile files — rizin 7.8 High2023-03-14
CVE-2023-27406 Siemens Tecnomatix Plant Simulation 缓冲区错误漏洞 — Tecnomatix Plant Simulation 7.8 High2023-03-14
CVE-2023-27404 Siemens Tecnomatix Plant Simulation 缓冲区错误漏洞 — Tecnomatix Plant Simulation 7.8 High2023-03-14
CVE-2023-27498 Memory Corruption vulnerability in SAP Host Agent (SAPOSCOL) — Host Agent (SAPOSCOL) 7.2 High2023-03-14
CVE-2022-33260 Stack based buffer overflow in Core — Snapdragon 5.9 Medium2023-03-07
CVE-2022-33213 Memory Corruption in MODEM — Snapdragon 7.5 High2023-03-07

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-121 (栈缓冲区溢出) represent 2531 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.