Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1000 CNY

100.0%

CWE-121 (栈缓冲区溢出) — Vulnerability Class 2518

2518 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-121 (栈缓冲区溢出). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-121 represents a critical memory safety weakness where program data exceeds the allocated bounds of a stack-allocated buffer, corrupting adjacent memory structures. Attackers typically exploit this vulnerability by injecting malicious payloads that overwrite the function’s return address or saved frame pointer, thereby hijacking control flow to execute arbitrary code with the privileges of the compromised process. This exploitation is particularly dangerous because stack buffers are local variables, making the attack surface common in low-level languages like C and C++. Developers mitigate this risk by enforcing strict input validation, utilizing safe string handling functions that prevent unbounded writes, and adopting modern programming languages with automatic memory management. Additionally, implementing compiler-level protections such as stack canaries and Address Space Layout Randomization significantly raises the barrier for successful exploitation, ensuring system integrity remains intact against buffer overflow attempts.

MITRE CWE Description
A stack-based buffer overflow condition is a condition where the buffer being overwritten is allocated on the stack (i.e., is a local variable or, rarely, a parameter to a function).
Common Consequences (3)
AvailabilityModify Memory, DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU), DoS: Resource Consumption (Memory)
Buffer overflows generally lead to crashes. Other attacks leading to lack of availability are possible, including putting the program into an infinite loop.
Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability, Access ControlModify Memory, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands, Bypass Protection Mechanism
Buffer overflows often can be used to execute arbitrary code, which is usually outside the scope of a program's implicit security policy.
Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability, Access Control, OtherModify Memory, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands, Bypass Protection Mechanism, Other
When the consequence is arbitrary code execution, this can often be used to subvert any other security service.
Mitigations (5)
Operation, Build and CompilationUse automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index checking. D3-SFCV (Stack Frame Canary Validation) from D3FEND [REF-1334] discusses…
Effectiveness: Defense in Depth
Architecture and DesignUse an abstraction library to abstract away risky APIs. Not a complete solution.
ImplementationImplement and perform bounds checking on input.
ImplementationDo not use dangerous functions such as gets. Use safer, equivalent functions which check for boundary errors.
Operation, Build and CompilationRun or compile the software using features or extensions that randomly arrange the positions of a program's executable and libraries in memory. Because this makes the addresses unpredictable, it can prevent an attacker from reliably jumping to exploitable code. Examples include Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) [REF-58] [REF-60] and Position-Independent Executables (PIE) [REF-64]. Imported…
Effectiveness: Defense in Depth
Examples (2)
While buffer overflow examples can be rather complex, it is possible to have very simple, yet still exploitable, stack-based buffer overflows:
#define BUFSIZE 256 int main(int argc, char **argv) { char buf[BUFSIZE]; strcpy(buf, argv[1]); }
Bad · C
This example takes an IP address from a user, verifies that it is well formed and then looks up the hostname and copies it into a buffer.
void host_lookup(char *user_supplied_addr){ struct hostent *hp; in_addr_t *addr; char hostname[64]; in_addr_t inet_addr(const char *cp); /*routine that ensures user_supplied_addr is in the right format for conversion */ validate_addr_form(user_supplied_addr); addr = inet_addr(user_supplied_addr); hp = gethostbyaddr( addr, sizeof(struct in_addr), AF_INET); strcpy(hostname, hp->h_name); }
Bad · C
CVE IDTitleCVSSSeverityPublished
CVE-2017-16267 INSTEON Hub 缓冲区错误漏洞 — Hub 9.9 -2023-01-11
CVE-2017-16268 INSTEON Hub 缓冲区错误漏洞 — Hub 9.9 -2023-01-11
CVE-2017-16269 INSTEON Hub 缓冲区错误漏洞 — Hub 9.9 -2023-01-11
CVE-2017-16270 INSTEON Hub 缓冲区错误漏洞 — Hub 9.9 -2023-01-11
CVE-2017-16256 INSTEON Hub 缓冲区错误漏洞 — Hub 9.9 -2023-01-11
CVE-2017-16257 INSTEON Hub 缓冲区错误漏洞 — Hub 9.9 -2023-01-11
CVE-2017-16258 INSTEON Hub 缓冲区错误漏洞 — Hub 9.9 -2023-01-11
CVE-2017-16259 INSTEON Hub 缓冲区错误漏洞 — Hub 9.9 -2023-01-11
CVE-2017-16260 INSTEON Hub 缓冲区错误漏洞 — Hub 9.9 -2023-01-11
CVE-2017-16261 INSTEON Hub 缓冲区错误漏洞 — Hub 9.9 -2023-01-11
CVE-2017-16262 INSTEON Hub 缓冲区错误漏洞 — Hub 9.9 -2023-01-11
CVE-2017-16263 INSTEON Hub 缓冲区错误漏洞 — Hub 9.9 -2023-01-11
CVE-2023-21732 Microsoft ODBC Driver Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Windows 10 Version 1809 8.8 High2023-01-10
CVE-2022-40201 Bentley Systems MicroStation 安全漏洞 — MicroStation Connect 7.8 High2023-01-06
CVE-2022-39116 UNISOC chipset 缓冲区错误漏洞 — SC9863A/SC9832E/SC7731E/T610/T310/T606/T760/T610/T618/T606/T612/T616/T760/T770/T820/S8000 5.5 -2023-01-04
CVE-2022-42270 NVIDIA Jetson 缓冲区错误漏洞 — NVIDIA Jetson AGX Xavier Series, Jetson Xavier NX, Jetson AGX Orin Series 7.8 High2022-12-30
CVE-2022-41981 OpenImageIO 缓冲区错误漏洞 — OpenImageIO 8.1 High2022-12-23
CVE-2022-39106 Google Pixel 缓冲区错误漏洞 — SC9863A/SC9832E/SC7731E/T610/T310/T606/T760/T610/T618/T606/T612/T616/T760/T770/T820/S8000 5.5 -2022-12-06
CVE-2022-39129 Google Pixel 缓冲区错误漏洞 — SC9863A/SC9832E/SC7731E/T610/T310/T606/T760/T610/T618/T606/T612/T616/T760/T770/T820/S8000 5.5 -2022-12-06
CVE-2022-34667 NVIDIA CUDA Toolkit 缓冲区错误漏洞 — NVIDIA CUDA Toolkit 4.4 Medium2022-11-18
CVE-2022-41854 Stack Overflow in Snakeyaml — SnakeYaml 5.8 Medium2022-11-11
CVE-2022-41664 Siemens JT2Go和Teamcenter Visualization 缓冲区错误漏洞 — JT2Go 7.8 High2022-11-08
CVE-2022-3228 Host Engineering H0-ECOM100 Communications Module 缓冲区错误漏洞 — H0-ECOM100 Communications Module 6.5 Medium2022-10-28
CVE-2022-3386 Advantech R-SeeNet 缓冲区错误漏洞 — R-SeeNet 9.8 Critical2022-10-27
CVE-2022-3385 Advantech R-SeeNet 缓冲区错误漏洞 — R-SeeNet 9.8 Critical2022-10-27
CVE-2022-3409 Unauthenticated out of bounds stack write in bmcweb — OpenBMC 8.2 High2022-10-27
CVE-2022-32454 Abode Iota 安全漏洞 — iota All-In-One Security Kit 9.8 -2022-10-25
CVE-2021-26730 spx_restservice Login_handler_func Subfunction Stack-Based Buffer Overflow — IAC-AST2500A 10.0 Critical2022-10-24
CVE-2022-38450 Adobe Acrobat Reader DC XFA Parsing Stack Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Acrobat Reader 7.8 High2022-10-14
CVE-2022-42339 Adobe Acrobat Reader DC XFA Parsing Stack Overflow Remote Code Execution — Acrobat Reader 7.8 High2022-10-14

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-121 (栈缓冲区溢出) represent 2518 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.