Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1110 CNY

100%

CWE-121 (栈缓冲区溢出) — Vulnerability Class 2560

2560 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-121 (栈缓冲区溢出). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-121 represents a critical memory safety weakness where program data exceeds the allocated bounds of a stack-allocated buffer, corrupting adjacent memory structures. Attackers typically exploit this vulnerability by injecting malicious payloads that overwrite the function’s return address or saved frame pointer, thereby hijacking control flow to execute arbitrary code with the privileges of the compromised process. This exploitation is particularly dangerous because stack buffers are local variables, making the attack surface common in low-level languages like C and C++. Developers mitigate this risk by enforcing strict input validation, utilizing safe string handling functions that prevent unbounded writes, and adopting modern programming languages with automatic memory management. Additionally, implementing compiler-level protections such as stack canaries and Address Space Layout Randomization significantly raises the barrier for successful exploitation, ensuring system integrity remains intact against buffer overflow attempts.

MITRE CWE Description
A stack-based buffer overflow condition is a condition where the buffer being overwritten is allocated on the stack (i.e., is a local variable or, rarely, a parameter to a function).
Common Consequences (3)
AvailabilityModify Memory, DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU), DoS: Resource Consumption (Memory)
Buffer overflows generally lead to crashes. Other attacks leading to lack of availability are possible, including putting the program into an infinite loop.
Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability, Access ControlModify Memory, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands, Bypass Protection Mechanism
Buffer overflows often can be used to execute arbitrary code, which is usually outside the scope of a program's implicit security policy.
Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability, Access Control, OtherModify Memory, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands, Bypass Protection Mechanism, Other
When the consequence is arbitrary code execution, this can often be used to subvert any other security service.
Mitigations (5)
Operation, Build and CompilationUse automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index checking. D3-SFCV (Stack Frame Canary Validation) from D3FEND [REF-1334] discusses…
Effectiveness: Defense in Depth
Architecture and DesignUse an abstraction library to abstract away risky APIs. Not a complete solution.
ImplementationImplement and perform bounds checking on input.
ImplementationDo not use dangerous functions such as gets. Use safer, equivalent functions which check for boundary errors.
Operation, Build and CompilationRun or compile the software using features or extensions that randomly arrange the positions of a program's executable and libraries in memory. Because this makes the addresses unpredictable, it can prevent an attacker from reliably jumping to exploitable code. Examples include Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) [REF-58] [REF-60] and Position-Independent Executables (PIE) [REF-64]. Imported…
Effectiveness: Defense in Depth
Examples (2)
While buffer overflow examples can be rather complex, it is possible to have very simple, yet still exploitable, stack-based buffer overflows:
#define BUFSIZE 256 int main(int argc, char **argv) { char buf[BUFSIZE]; strcpy(buf, argv[1]); }
Bad · C
This example takes an IP address from a user, verifies that it is well formed and then looks up the hostname and copies it into a buffer.
void host_lookup(char *user_supplied_addr){ struct hostent *hp; in_addr_t *addr; char hostname[64]; in_addr_t inet_addr(const char *cp); /*routine that ensures user_supplied_addr is in the right format for conversion */ validate_addr_form(user_supplied_addr); addr = inet_addr(user_supplied_addr); hp = gethostbyaddr( addr, sizeof(struct in_addr), AF_INET); strcpy(hostname, hp->h_name); }
Bad · C
CVE IDTitleCVSSSeverityPublished
CVE-2023-33028 Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input in WLAN Firmware — Snapdragon 9.8 Critical2023-10-03
CVE-2023-28393 Accusoft ImageGear 缓冲区错误漏洞 — ImageGear 5.6 Medium2023-09-25
CVE-2023-2262 Rockwell Automation Select Logix Communication Modules Vulnerable to Email Object Buffer Overflow — 1756-EN2T Series A, B, C 9.8 Critical2023-09-20
CVE-2023-25528 NVIDIA DGX 缓冲区错误漏洞 — DGX H100 BMC 8.8 High2023-09-20
CVE-2023-4527 Glibc: stack read overflow in getaddrinfo in no-aaaa mode — Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 6.5 Medium2023-09-18
CVE-2023-38148 Internet Connection Sharing (ICS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Windows Server 2022 8.8 High2023-09-12
CVE-2023-35355 Windows Cloud Files Mini Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability — Windows 10 Version 1809 7.8 High2023-09-12
CVE-2023-38070 Siemens JT2GO 安全漏洞 — JT2Go 7.8 High2023-09-12
CVE-2019-16470 CoolType.dll crash - Tianfu Cup — Acrobat Reader 7.8 High2023-09-11
CVE-2023-4685 CVE-2023-4685 — CNCSoft-B DOPSoft 7.8 High2023-09-07
CVE-2023-20250 Cisco Small Business 缓冲区错误漏洞 — Cisco Small Business RV Series Router Firmware 6.5 Medium2023-09-06
CVE-2023-28538 Stack-based Buffer Overflow in WIN Product — Snapdragon 8.4 High2023-09-05
CVE-2023-4756 Stack-based Buffer Overflow in gpac/gpac — gpac/gpac 7.8 -2023-09-04
CVE-2023-4744 Tenda AC8 formSetDeviceName stack-based overflow — AC8 9.8 Critical2023-09-03
CVE-2023-41028 Juplink RX4-1500 Stack-based Buffer Overflow Vulnerability — RX4-1500 9.0 Critical2023-08-23
CVE-2023-29182 Fortinet FortiOS 缓冲区错误漏洞 — FortiOS 6.4 Medium2023-08-17
CVE-2023-4273 Kernel: exfat: stack overflow in exfat_get_uniname_from_ext_entry — Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 6.0 Medium2023-08-09
CVE-2023-0426 Stack overflow in filename or in boundary — Freelance controllers AC 700F 8.6 High2023-08-07
CVE-2023-33308 Fortinet FortiOS 缓冲区错误漏洞 — FortiProxy 9.8 Critical2023-07-26
CVE-2023-22363 Access Zone stack overflow — Command Centre 6.5 Medium2023-07-24
CVE-2023-28728 Panasonic Control FPWIN Pro 缓冲区错误漏洞 — Control FPWIN Pro 7.8 High2023-07-21
CVE-2023-35012 IBM Db2 code execution — Db2 for Linux, UNIX and Windows 6.7 Medium2023-07-17
CVE-2023-35322 Windows Deployment Services Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Windows Server 2019 8.8 High2023-07-11
CVE-2023-37375 Siemens Tecnomatix Plant Simulation 缓冲区错误漏洞 — Tecnomatix Plant Simulation V2201 7.8 High2023-07-11
CVE-2023-37374 Siemens Tecnomatix Plant Simulation 缓冲区错误漏洞 — Tecnomatix Plant Simulation V2201 7.8 High2023-07-11
CVE-2023-23902 Milesight UR32L 安全漏洞 — UR32L 9.8 Critical2023-07-06
CVE-2023-24018 Milesight UR32L 缓冲区错误漏洞 — UR32L 8.8 High2023-07-06
CVE-2023-25124 Milesight UR32L 缓冲区错误漏洞 — UR32L 7.2 High2023-07-06
CVE-2023-25123 Milesight UR32L 缓冲区错误漏洞 — UR32L 7.2 High2023-07-06
CVE-2023-25122 Milesight UR32L 缓冲区错误漏洞 — UR32L 7.2 High2023-07-06

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-121 (栈缓冲区溢出) represent 2560 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.