Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1325 CNY

100%

CWE-121 (栈缓冲区溢出) — Vulnerability Class 2665

2665 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-121 (栈缓冲区溢出). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-121 represents a critical memory safety weakness where program data exceeds the allocated bounds of a stack-allocated buffer, corrupting adjacent memory structures. Attackers typically exploit this vulnerability by injecting malicious payloads that overwrite the function’s return address or saved frame pointer, thereby hijacking control flow to execute arbitrary code with the privileges of the compromised process. This exploitation is particularly dangerous because stack buffers are local variables, making the attack surface common in low-level languages like C and C++. Developers mitigate this risk by enforcing strict input validation, utilizing safe string handling functions that prevent unbounded writes, and adopting modern programming languages with automatic memory management. Additionally, implementing compiler-level protections such as stack canaries and Address Space Layout Randomization significantly raises the barrier for successful exploitation, ensuring system integrity remains intact against buffer overflow attempts.

MITRE CWE Description
A stack-based buffer overflow condition is a condition where the buffer being overwritten is allocated on the stack (i.e., is a local variable or, rarely, a parameter to a function).
Common Consequences (3)
AvailabilityModify Memory, DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU), DoS: Resource Consumption (Memory)
Buffer overflows generally lead to crashes. Other attacks leading to lack of availability are possible, including putting the program into an infinite loop.
Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability, Access ControlModify Memory, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands, Bypass Protection Mechanism
Buffer overflows often can be used to execute arbitrary code, which is usually outside the scope of a program's implicit security policy.
Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability, Access Control, OtherModify Memory, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands, Bypass Protection Mechanism, Other
When the consequence is arbitrary code execution, this can often be used to subvert any other security service.
Mitigations (5)
Operation, Build and CompilationUse automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index checking. D3-SFCV (Stack Frame Canary Validation) from D3FEND [REF-1334] discusses…
Effectiveness: Defense in Depth
Architecture and DesignUse an abstraction library to abstract away risky APIs. Not a complete solution.
ImplementationImplement and perform bounds checking on input.
ImplementationDo not use dangerous functions such as gets. Use safer, equivalent functions which check for boundary errors.
Operation, Build and CompilationRun or compile the software using features or extensions that randomly arrange the positions of a program's executable and libraries in memory. Because this makes the addresses unpredictable, it can prevent an attacker from reliably jumping to exploitable code. Examples include Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) [REF-58] [REF-60] and Position-Independent Executables (PIE) [REF-64]. Imported…
Effectiveness: Defense in Depth
Examples (2)
While buffer overflow examples can be rather complex, it is possible to have very simple, yet still exploitable, stack-based buffer overflows:
#define BUFSIZE 256 int main(int argc, char **argv) { char buf[BUFSIZE]; strcpy(buf, argv[1]); }
Bad · C
This example takes an IP address from a user, verifies that it is well formed and then looks up the hostname and copies it into a buffer.
void host_lookup(char *user_supplied_addr){ struct hostent *hp; in_addr_t *addr; char hostname[64]; in_addr_t inet_addr(const char *cp); /*routine that ensures user_supplied_addr is in the right format for conversion */ validate_addr_form(user_supplied_addr); addr = inet_addr(user_supplied_addr); hp = gethostbyaddr( addr, sizeof(struct in_addr), AF_INET); strcpy(hostname, hp->h_name); }
Bad · C
CVE IDTitleCVSSSeverityPublished
CVE-2024-0540 Tenda W9 httpd formOfflineSet stack-based overflow — W9 6.3 Medium2024-01-15
CVE-2024-0539 Tenda W9 httpd formQosManage_user stack-based overflow — W9 8.8 High2024-01-15
CVE-2024-0538 Tenda W9 httpd formQosManage_auto stack-based overflow — W9 8.8 High2024-01-15
CVE-2024-0537 Tenda W9 httpd setWrlBasicInfo stack-based overflow — W9 8.8 High2024-01-15
CVE-2024-0536 Tenda W9 httpd setWrlAccessList stack-based overflow — W9 8.8 High2024-01-15
CVE-2024-0535 Tenda PA6 httpd portmap cgiPortMapAdd stack-based overflow — PA6 8.8 High2024-01-15
CVE-2024-0534 Tenda A15 Web-based Management Interface SetOnlineDevName stack-based overflow — A15 7.2 High2024-01-15
CVE-2024-0533 Tenda A15 Web-based Management Interface SetOnlineDevName stack-based overflow — A15 7.2 High2024-01-15
CVE-2024-0532 Tenda A15 Web-based Management Interface WifiExtraSet set_repeat5 stack-based overflow — A15 7.2 High2024-01-15
CVE-2024-0531 Tenda A15 Web-based Management Interface setBlackRule stack-based overflow — A15 7.2 High2024-01-15
CVE-2023-42463 wazuh-logcollector integer underflow local privilege escalation — wazuh 7.4 High2024-01-12
CVE-2023-31024 CVE — DGX A100 9.0 Critical2024-01-12
CVE-2023-31030 CVE — DGX A100 9.3 Critical2024-01-12
CVE-2023-31029 CVE — DGX A100 9.3 Critical2024-01-12
CVE-2023-48266 Bosch Nexo cordless nutrunner 安全漏洞 — Nexo cordless nutrunner NXA015S-36V (0608842001) 8.1 High2024-01-10
CVE-2023-48265 Bosch Nexo cordless nutrunner 安全漏洞 — Nexo cordless nutrunner NXA015S-36V (0608842001) 8.1 High2024-01-10
CVE-2023-48264 Bosch Nexo cordless nutrunner 安全漏洞 — Nexo cordless nutrunner NXA015S-36V (0608842001) 8.1 High2024-01-10
CVE-2023-48262 Bosch Nexo cordless nutrunner 安全漏洞 — Nexo cordless nutrunner NXA015S-36V (0608842001) 8.1 High2024-01-10
CVE-2023-37296 Stack-based Buffer Overflow — MegaRAC_SPx 8.3 High2024-01-09
CVE-2023-37293 stack-based buffer overflow — MegaRAC_SPx 9.6 Critical2024-01-09
CVE-2023-3043 Stack-based Buffer Overflow BMC — MegaRAC_SPx 9.6 Critical2024-01-09
CVE-2023-51746 Siemens JT2GO和Teamcenter Visualization 安全漏洞 — JT2Go 7.8 High2024-01-09
CVE-2023-51745 Siemens JT2GO和Teamcenter Visualization 安全漏洞 — JT2Go 7.8 High2024-01-09
CVE-2023-49129 Siemens Solid Edge 安全漏洞 — Solid Edge SE2023 7.8 High2024-01-09
CVE-2023-7220 Totolink NR1800X cstecgi.cgi loginAuth stack-based overflow — NR1800X 9.8 Critical2024-01-09
CVE-2023-7219 Totolink N350RT cstecgi.cgi loginAuth stack-based overflow — N350RT 7.2 High2024-01-09
CVE-2023-7218 Totolink N350RT cstecgi.cgi loginAuth stack-based overflow — N350RT 7.2 High2024-01-08
CVE-2023-35702 GTKWave 安全漏洞 — GTKWave 7.8 High2024-01-08
CVE-2023-35703 GTKWave 安全漏洞 — GTKWave 7.8 High2024-01-08
CVE-2023-35704 GTKWave 安全漏洞 — GTKWave 7.8 High2024-01-08

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-121 (栈缓冲区溢出) represent 2665 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.