Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1310 CNY

100%

CWE-121 (栈缓冲区溢出) — Vulnerability Class 2614

2614 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-121 (栈缓冲区溢出). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-121 represents a critical memory safety weakness where program data exceeds the allocated bounds of a stack-allocated buffer, corrupting adjacent memory structures. Attackers typically exploit this vulnerability by injecting malicious payloads that overwrite the function’s return address or saved frame pointer, thereby hijacking control flow to execute arbitrary code with the privileges of the compromised process. This exploitation is particularly dangerous because stack buffers are local variables, making the attack surface common in low-level languages like C and C++. Developers mitigate this risk by enforcing strict input validation, utilizing safe string handling functions that prevent unbounded writes, and adopting modern programming languages with automatic memory management. Additionally, implementing compiler-level protections such as stack canaries and Address Space Layout Randomization significantly raises the barrier for successful exploitation, ensuring system integrity remains intact against buffer overflow attempts.

MITRE CWE Description
A stack-based buffer overflow condition is a condition where the buffer being overwritten is allocated on the stack (i.e., is a local variable or, rarely, a parameter to a function).
Common Consequences (3)
AvailabilityModify Memory, DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU), DoS: Resource Consumption (Memory)
Buffer overflows generally lead to crashes. Other attacks leading to lack of availability are possible, including putting the program into an infinite loop.
Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability, Access ControlModify Memory, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands, Bypass Protection Mechanism
Buffer overflows often can be used to execute arbitrary code, which is usually outside the scope of a program's implicit security policy.
Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability, Access Control, OtherModify Memory, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands, Bypass Protection Mechanism, Other
When the consequence is arbitrary code execution, this can often be used to subvert any other security service.
Mitigations (5)
Operation, Build and CompilationUse automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index checking. D3-SFCV (Stack Frame Canary Validation) from D3FEND [REF-1334] discusses…
Effectiveness: Defense in Depth
Architecture and DesignUse an abstraction library to abstract away risky APIs. Not a complete solution.
ImplementationImplement and perform bounds checking on input.
ImplementationDo not use dangerous functions such as gets. Use safer, equivalent functions which check for boundary errors.
Operation, Build and CompilationRun or compile the software using features or extensions that randomly arrange the positions of a program's executable and libraries in memory. Because this makes the addresses unpredictable, it can prevent an attacker from reliably jumping to exploitable code. Examples include Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) [REF-58] [REF-60] and Position-Independent Executables (PIE) [REF-64]. Imported…
Effectiveness: Defense in Depth
Examples (2)
While buffer overflow examples can be rather complex, it is possible to have very simple, yet still exploitable, stack-based buffer overflows:
#define BUFSIZE 256 int main(int argc, char **argv) { char buf[BUFSIZE]; strcpy(buf, argv[1]); }
Bad · C
This example takes an IP address from a user, verifies that it is well formed and then looks up the hostname and copies it into a buffer.
void host_lookup(char *user_supplied_addr){ struct hostent *hp; in_addr_t *addr; char hostname[64]; in_addr_t inet_addr(const char *cp); /*routine that ensures user_supplied_addr is in the right format for conversion */ validate_addr_form(user_supplied_addr); addr = inet_addr(user_supplied_addr); hp = gethostbyaddr( addr, sizeof(struct in_addr), AF_INET); strcpy(hostname, hp->h_name); }
Bad · C
CVE IDTitleCVSSSeverityPublished
CVE-2024-1004 Totolink N200RE cstecgi.cgi loginAuth stack-based overflow — N200RE 7.2 High2024-01-29
CVE-2024-1003 Totolink N200RE cstecgi.cgi setLanguageCfg stack-based overflow — N200RE 7.2 High2024-01-29
CVE-2024-1002 Totolink N200RE cstecgi.cgi setIpPortFilterRules stack-based overflow — N200RE 7.2 High2024-01-29
CVE-2024-1001 Totolink N200RE cstecgi.cgi main stack-based overflow — N200RE 7.2 High2024-01-29
CVE-2024-1000 Totolink N200RE cstecgi.cgi setTracerouteCfg stack-based overflow — N200RE 7.2 High2024-01-29
CVE-2024-0999 Totolink N200RE cstecgi.cgi setParentalRules stack-based overflow — N200RE 7.2 High2024-01-29
CVE-2024-0998 Totolink N200RE cstecgi.cgi setDiagnosisCfg stack-based overflow — N200RE 7.2 High2024-01-29
CVE-2024-0997 Totolink N200RE cstecgi.cgi setOpModeCfg stack-based overflow — N200RE 7.2 High2024-01-29
CVE-2024-0996 Tenda i9 httpd setcfm formSetCfm stack-based overflow — i9 7.2 High2024-01-29
CVE-2024-0995 Tenda W6 httpd wifiSSIDset formwrlSSIDset stack-based overflow — W6 7.2 High2024-01-29
CVE-2024-0994 Tenda W6 httpd setcfm formSetCfm stack-based overflow — W6 7.2 High2024-01-29
CVE-2024-0993 Tenda i6 httpd WifiMacFilterGet formWifiMacFilterGet stack-based overflow — i6 7.2 High2024-01-29
CVE-2024-0992 Tenda i6 httpd wifiSSIDset formwrlSSIDset stack-based overflow — i6 7.2 High2024-01-29
CVE-2024-0991 Tenda i6 httpd setcfm formSetCfm stack-based overflow — i6 7.2 High2024-01-29
CVE-2024-0990 Tenda i6 httpd setAutoPing formSetAutoPing stack-based overflow — i6 7.2 High2024-01-29
CVE-2024-0962 obgm libcoap Configuration File coap_oscore.c get_split_entry stack-based overflow — libcoap 6.3 Medium2024-01-27
CVE-2024-0932 Tenda AC10U setSmartPowerManagement stack-based overflow — AC10U 4.7 Medium2024-01-26
CVE-2024-0931 Tenda AC10U saveParentControlInfo stack-based overflow — AC10U 4.7 Medium2024-01-26
CVE-2024-0930 Tenda AC10U fromSetWirelessRepeat stack-based overflow — AC10U 4.7 Medium2024-01-26
CVE-2024-0929 Tenda AC10U fromNatStaticSetting stack-based overflow — AC10U 4.7 Medium2024-01-26
CVE-2024-0928 Tenda AC10U fromDhcpListClient stack-based overflow — AC10U 4.7 Medium2024-01-26
CVE-2024-0927 Tenda AC10U fromAddressNat stack-based overflow — AC10U 4.7 Medium2024-01-26
CVE-2024-0926 Tenda AC10U formWifiWpsOOB stack-based overflow — AC10U 4.7 Medium2024-01-26
CVE-2024-0925 Tenda AC10U formSetVirtualSer stack-based overflow — AC10U 4.7 Medium2024-01-26
CVE-2024-0924 Tenda AC10U formSetPPTPServer stack-based overflow — AC10U 4.7 Medium2024-01-26
CVE-2024-0923 Tenda AC10U formSetDeviceName stack-based overflow — AC10U 4.7 Medium2024-01-26
CVE-2024-0922 Tenda AC10U formQuickIndex stack-based overflow — AC10U 4.7 Medium2024-01-26
CVE-2023-6340 SonicWALL NetExtender 安全漏洞 — Capture Client 6.2 -2024-01-17
CVE-2024-0578 Totolink LR1200GB cstecgi.cgi UploadCustomModule stack-based overflow — LR1200GB 8.8 High2024-01-16
CVE-2024-0577 Totolink LR1200GB cstecgi.cgi setLanguageCfg stack-based overflow — LR1200GB 8.8 High2024-01-16

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-121 (栈缓冲区溢出) represent 2614 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.