Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1000 CNY

100.0%

CWE-20 (输入验证不恰当) — Vulnerability Class 3357

3357 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-20 (输入验证不恰当). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-20 represents a critical software weakness where applications fail to properly verify the integrity, format, or type of incoming data before processing it. This oversight allows attackers to inject malicious payloads, such as SQL injection strings or cross-site scripting code, which can bypass security controls and compromise system integrity. Exploitation typically occurs when untrusted data from external sources, like user forms or network packets, is treated as executable code or trusted input. To mitigate this risk, developers must implement rigorous input validation strategies, including strict type checking, length constraints, and allow-listing acceptable characters. Additionally, employing parameterized queries and output encoding ensures that even if validation fails, the injected data remains inert, thereby preserving application security and preventing unauthorized execution or data exposure.

MITRE CWE Description
The product receives input or data, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the properties that are required to process the data safely and correctly. Input validation is a frequently-used technique for checking potentially dangerous inputs in order to ensure that the inputs are safe for processing within the code, or when communicating with other components. Input can consist of: raw data - strings, numbers, parameters, file contents, etc. metadata - information about the raw data, such as headers or size Data can be simple or structured. Structured data can be composed of many nested layers, composed of combinations of metadata and raw data, with other simple or structured data. Many properties of raw data or metadata may need to be validated upon entry into the code, such as: specified quantities such as size, length, frequency, price, rate, number of operations, time, etc. implied or derived quantities, such as the actual size of a file instead of a specified size indexes, offsets, or positions into more complex data structures symbolic keys or other elements into hash tables, associative arrays, etc. well-formedness, i.e. syntactic correctness - compliance with expected syntax lexical token correctness - compliance with rules for what is treated as a token specified or derived type - the actual type of the input (or what the input appears to be) consistency - between individual data el…
Common Consequences (3)
AvailabilityDoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU), DoS: Resource Consumption (Memory)
An attacker could provide unexpected values and cause a program crash or arbitrary control of resource allocation, leading to excessive consumption of resources such as memory and CPU.
ConfidentialityRead Memory, Read Files or Directories
An attacker could read confidential data if they are able to control resource references.
Integrity, Confidentiality, AvailabilityModify Memory, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands
An attacker could use malicious input to modify data or possibly alter control flow in unexpected ways, including arbitrary command execution.
Mitigations (5)
Architecture and DesignConsider using language-theoretic security (LangSec) techniques that characterize inputs using a formal language and build "recognizers" for that language. This effectively requires parsing to be a distinct layer that effectively enforces a boundary between raw input and internal data representations, instead of allowing parser code to be scattered throughout the program, where it could be subjec…
Architecture and DesignUse an input validation framework such as Struts or the OWASP ESAPI Validation API. Note that using a framework does not automatically address all input validation problems; be mindful of weaknesses that could arise from misusing the framework itself (CWE-1173).
Architecture and Design, ImplementationUnderstand all the potential areas where untrusted inputs can enter the product, including but not limited to: parameters or arguments, cookies, anything read from the network, environment variables, reverse DNS lookups, query results, request headers, URL components, e-mail, files, filenames, databases, and any external systems that provide data to the application. Remember that such inputs may b…
ImplementationAssume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range…
Effectiveness: High
Architecture and DesignFor any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server. Even though clien…
Examples (2)
This example demonstrates a shopping interaction in which the user is free to specify the quantity of items to be purchased and a total is calculated.
... public static final double price = 20.00; int quantity = currentUser.getAttribute("quantity"); double total = price * quantity; chargeUser(total); ...
Bad · Java
This example asks the user for a height and width of an m X n game board with a maximum dimension of 100 squares.
... #define MAX_DIM 100 ... /* board dimensions */ int m,n, error; board_square_t *board; printf("Please specify the board height: \n"); error = scanf("%d", &m); if ( EOF == error ){ die("No integer passed: Die evil hacker!\n"); } printf("Please specify the board width: \n"); error = scanf("%d", &n); if ( EOF == error ){ die("No integer passed: Die evil hacker!\n"); } if ( m > MAX_DIM || n > MAX_DIM ) { die("Value too large: Die evil hacker!\n"); } board = (board_square_t*) malloc( m * n * sizeof(board_square_t)); ...
Bad · C
CVE IDTitleCVSSSeverityPublished
CVE-2023-5624 Blind SQL Injection — Nessus Network Monitor 7.2 High2023-10-26
CVE-2023-5044 Code injection via nginx.ingress.kubernetes.io/permanent-redirect annotation — ingress-nginx 7.6 High2023-10-25
CVE-2023-5043 Ingress nginx annotation injection causes arbitrary command execution — ingress-nginx 7.6 High2023-10-25
CVE-2022-4886 Ingress-nginx `path` sanitization can be bypassed with `log_format` directive — ingress-nginx 8.8 High2023-10-25
CVE-2021-26736 ZApp Installer Privilege Escalation Vulnerabilities — Client Connector 6.7 Medium2023-10-23
CVE-2023-45805 Trojan Lockfilein pdm — pdm 7.8 High2023-10-20
CVE-2023-39456 Apache Traffic Server: Malformed http/2 frames can cause an abort — Apache Traffic Server 7.5 -2023-10-17
CVE-2021-29913 IBM Security Verify Privilege improper input validation — Security Verify Privilege 6.5 Medium2023-10-17
CVE-2022-22384 IBM Security Verify Privilege improper input validation — Security Verify Privilege 4.3 Medium2023-10-17
CVE-2023-40373 IBM Db2 denial of service — Db2 for Linux, UNIX and Windows 5.3 Medium2023-10-16
CVE-2023-38719 IBM Db2 denial of service — Db2 for Linux, UNIX and Windows 5.1 Medium2023-10-16
CVE-2023-40372 IBM Db2 denial of service — Db2 for Linux, UNIX and Windows 5.3 Medium2023-10-16
CVE-2023-30991 IBM Db2 denial of service — Db2 for Linux, UNIX and Windows 7.5 High2023-10-16
CVE-2023-40374 IBM Db2 denial of service — Db2 for Linux, UNIX and Windows 5.3 Medium2023-10-16
CVE-2023-38728 IBM Db2 denial of service — Db2 for Linux, UNIX and Windows 5.3 Medium2023-10-16
CVE-2023-38740 IBM Db2 denial of service — Db2 for Linux, UNIX and Windows 5.3 Medium2023-10-16
CVE-2023-38720 IBM Db2 denial of service — Db2 for Linux, UNIX and Windows 5.3 Medium2023-10-16
CVE-2023-30987 IBM Db2 denial of service — Db2 for Linux, UNIX and Windows 5.3 Medium2023-10-16
CVE-2023-45128 CSRF Token Reuse Vulnerability in fiber — fiber 10.0 Critical2023-10-16
CVE-2023-5421 Possible XSS execution in customer information — OTRS 3.5 Low2023-10-16
CVE-2023-45176 IBM App Connect Enterprise and IBM Integration Bus denial of service — App Connect Enterprise 6.2 Medium2023-10-14
CVE-2023-29464 Rockwell Automation FactoryTalk Linx Vulnerable to Denial-of-Service and Information Disclosure — FactoryTalk Linx 8.2 High2023-10-13
CVE-2023-5571 Improper Input Validation in vriteio/vrite — vriteio/vrite 8.1 -2023-10-13
CVE-2023-26367 Error based file extraction via PHP filter chains during product bulk import logic — Adobe Commerce 4.9 Medium2023-10-13
CVE-2023-44192 Junos OS: QFX5000 Series: DMA memory leak is observed when specific DHCP packets are transmitted over pseudo-VTEP — Junos OS 7.5 High2023-10-12
CVE-2023-44185 Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved: In an BGP scenario RPD crashes upon receiving and processing a specific malformed ISO VPN BGP UPDATE packet — Junos OS 7.5 High2023-10-12
CVE-2023-44183 Junos OS: QFX5000 Series, EX4600 Series: In a VxLAN scenario an adjacent attacker within the VxLAN sending genuine packets may cause a DMA memory leak to occur. — Junos OS 6.5 Medium2023-10-12
CVE-2023-32721 Stored XSS in Maps element — Zabbix 7.6 High2023-10-12
CVE-2023-44110 Huawei HarmonyOS 输入验证错误漏洞 — HarmonyOS 7.5 -2023-10-11
CVE-2023-44103 Huawei HarmonyOS 缓冲区错误漏洞 — HarmonyOS 6.5 -2023-10-11

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-20 (输入验证不恰当) represent 3357 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.