Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1000 CNY

100.0%

CWE-20 (输入验证不恰当) — Vulnerability Class 3319

3319 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-20 (输入验证不恰当). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-20 represents a critical software weakness where applications fail to properly verify the integrity, format, or type of incoming data before processing it. This oversight allows attackers to inject malicious payloads, such as SQL injection strings or cross-site scripting code, which can bypass security controls and compromise system integrity. Exploitation typically occurs when untrusted data from external sources, like user forms or network packets, is treated as executable code or trusted input. To mitigate this risk, developers must implement rigorous input validation strategies, including strict type checking, length constraints, and allow-listing acceptable characters. Additionally, employing parameterized queries and output encoding ensures that even if validation fails, the injected data remains inert, thereby preserving application security and preventing unauthorized execution or data exposure.

MITRE CWE Description
The product receives input or data, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the properties that are required to process the data safely and correctly. Input validation is a frequently-used technique for checking potentially dangerous inputs in order to ensure that the inputs are safe for processing within the code, or when communicating with other components. Input can consist of: raw data - strings, numbers, parameters, file contents, etc. metadata - information about the raw data, such as headers or size Data can be simple or structured. Structured data can be composed of many nested layers, composed of combinations of metadata and raw data, with other simple or structured data. Many properties of raw data or metadata may need to be validated upon entry into the code, such as: specified quantities such as size, length, frequency, price, rate, number of operations, time, etc. implied or derived quantities, such as the actual size of a file instead of a specified size indexes, offsets, or positions into more complex data structures symbolic keys or other elements into hash tables, associative arrays, etc. well-formedness, i.e. syntactic correctness - compliance with expected syntax lexical token correctness - compliance with rules for what is treated as a token specified or derived type - the actual type of the input (or what the input appears to be) consistency - between individual data el…
Common Consequences (3)
AvailabilityDoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU), DoS: Resource Consumption (Memory)
An attacker could provide unexpected values and cause a program crash or arbitrary control of resource allocation, leading to excessive consumption of resources such as memory and CPU.
ConfidentialityRead Memory, Read Files or Directories
An attacker could read confidential data if they are able to control resource references.
Integrity, Confidentiality, AvailabilityModify Memory, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands
An attacker could use malicious input to modify data or possibly alter control flow in unexpected ways, including arbitrary command execution.
Mitigations (5)
Architecture and DesignConsider using language-theoretic security (LangSec) techniques that characterize inputs using a formal language and build "recognizers" for that language. This effectively requires parsing to be a distinct layer that effectively enforces a boundary between raw input and internal data representations, instead of allowing parser code to be scattered throughout the program, where it could be subjec…
Architecture and DesignUse an input validation framework such as Struts or the OWASP ESAPI Validation API. Note that using a framework does not automatically address all input validation problems; be mindful of weaknesses that could arise from misusing the framework itself (CWE-1173).
Architecture and Design, ImplementationUnderstand all the potential areas where untrusted inputs can enter the product, including but not limited to: parameters or arguments, cookies, anything read from the network, environment variables, reverse DNS lookups, query results, request headers, URL components, e-mail, files, filenames, databases, and any external systems that provide data to the application. Remember that such inputs may b…
ImplementationAssume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range…
Effectiveness: High
Architecture and DesignFor any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server. Even though clien…
Examples (2)
This example demonstrates a shopping interaction in which the user is free to specify the quantity of items to be purchased and a total is calculated.
... public static final double price = 20.00; int quantity = currentUser.getAttribute("quantity"); double total = price * quantity; chargeUser(total); ...
Bad · Java
This example asks the user for a height and width of an m X n game board with a maximum dimension of 100 squares.
... #define MAX_DIM 100 ... /* board dimensions */ int m,n, error; board_square_t *board; printf("Please specify the board height: \n"); error = scanf("%d", &m); if ( EOF == error ){ die("No integer passed: Die evil hacker!\n"); } printf("Please specify the board width: \n"); error = scanf("%d", &n); if ( EOF == error ){ die("No integer passed: Die evil hacker!\n"); } if ( m > MAX_DIM || n > MAX_DIM ) { die("Value too large: Die evil hacker!\n"); } board = (board_square_t*) malloc( m * n * sizeof(board_square_t)); ...
Bad · C
CVE IDTitleCVSSSeverityPublished
CVE-2026-7965 Chrome<148.0.7778.96 DevTools跨域数据泄露漏洞 — Chrome--2026-05-06
CVE-2026-7966 Chrome 148.0.7778.96前网站隔离绕过漏洞 — Chrome--2026-05-06
CVE-2026-7962 Chrome 148.0.7778.96以下 DirectSockets策略执行漏洞 — Chrome--2026-05-06
CVE-2026-7961 Chrome<148.0.7778.96权限输入验证不足致数据泄露 — Chrome--2026-05-06
CVE-2026-7953 Google Chrome UXSS漏洞 — Chrome--2026-05-06
CVE-2026-7947 Chrome前148.0.7778.96网络输入验证漏洞致UI欺骗 — Chrome--2026-05-06
CVE-2026-7945 Chrome 148.0.7778.96前存在COOP验证不足漏洞 — Chrome--2026-05-06
CVE-2026-7944 Chrome<148.0.7778.96 持久缓存验证不足绕过站点隔离 — Chrome--2026-05-06
CVE-2026-7943 Chrome 148.0.7778.96前ANGLE输入验证不足致任意读写 — Chrome--2026-05-06
CVE-2026-7941 Android Chrome <148.0.7778.96 UXSS漏洞 — Chrome--2026-05-06
CVE-2026-7934 Chrome<148.0.7778.96 Popup Blocker输入验证不足漏洞 — Chrome--2026-05-06
CVE-2026-7931 Chrome on iOS <148.0.7778.96 远程UI欺骗漏洞 — Chrome--2026-05-06
CVE-2026-7930 Chrome<148.0.7778.96 Cookie输入验证不足导致提权 — Chrome--2026-05-06
CVE-2026-7905 Chrome Android 多个版本输入验证不足导致沙箱逃逸 — Chrome--2026-05-06
CVE-2026-40068 Claude Code arbitrary code execution via git worktree commondir trust dialog bypass — claude-code--2026-05-05
CVE-2026-32603 Sandboxie kernel driver denial of service via malformed IOCTL from sandboxed process — Sandboxie--2026-05-05
CVE-2026-5174 Improper Access Control Vulnerability in Progress MOVEit Automation — MOVEit Automation 7.7 High2026-04-30
CVE-2026-1858 wget2 Improper Certificate Validation — wget2 4.8 Medium2026-04-29
CVE-2026-7345 Google Chrome 输入验证错误漏洞 — Chrome 9.6AICriticalAI2026-04-28
CVE-2026-7360 Google Chrome 输入验证错误漏洞 — Chrome 6.5AIMediumAI2026-04-28
CVE-2026-24204 NVIDIA FLARE SDK 输入验证错误漏洞 — FLARE SDK 6.5 Medium2026-04-28
CVE-2024-54011 Missing Error/Exception Handling — QND-8080R 7.5AIHighAI2026-04-28
CVE-2026-5941 Foxit PDF Editor/Reader AcroForm Signature Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Foxit PDF Editor 7.8 High2026-04-27
CVE-2026-41044 Apache ActiveMQ, Apache ActiveMQ Broker, Apache ActiveMQ All: Authenticated user can perform RCE via DestinationView MBean exposed by Jolokia — Apache ActiveMQ 7.2AIHighAI2026-04-24
CVE-2026-40466 Apache ActiveMQ Broker, Apache ActiveMQ All, Apache ActiveMQ: Possible bypass of CVE-2026-34197 via HTTP discovery second-stage URI — Apache ActiveMQ Broker 8.8AIHighAI2026-04-24
CVE-2026-41268 Flowise: Flowise Parameter Override Bypass Remote Command Execution — Flowise 9.8AICriticalAI2026-04-23
CVE-2026-34066 nimiq-blockchain: Peer-triggerable panic during history sync — nimiq-blockchain 5.3 Medium2026-04-22
CVE-2026-33471 nimiq-block has skip block quorum bypass via out-of-range BitSet indices & u16 truncation — nimiq-block 9.6 Critical2026-04-22
CVE-2026-35380 uutils coreutils cut Local Logic Error and Data Integrity Issue in Delimiter Parsing — coreutils 5.5 Medium2026-04-22
CVE-2026-35377 uutils coreutils env Local Denial of Service via Improper Handling of Backslashes in Split-String Mode — coreutils 3.3 Low2026-04-22

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-20 (输入验证不恰当) represent 3319 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.