Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1000 CNY

100.0%

CWE-122 (堆缓冲区溢出) — Vulnerability Class 1895

1895 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-122 (堆缓冲区溢出). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-122 represents a critical memory safety weakness where an application writes data beyond the allocated boundaries of a heap-allocated buffer, typically created via functions like malloc. This vulnerability arises when developers fail to validate input lengths or perform insufficient bounds checking before copying data into dynamically allocated memory regions. Attackers exploit this flaw by crafting malicious inputs that exceed buffer limits, allowing them to overwrite adjacent heap metadata or control structures. Such overwrites can corrupt the heap manager’s internal state, leading to application crashes, data leakage, or arbitrary code execution by hijacking control flow. To prevent heap-based buffer overflows, developers must rigorously validate all input sizes against buffer capacities, utilize safe string handling libraries that enforce length limits, and employ modern memory-safe programming languages that automatically manage memory boundaries, thereby eliminating manual pointer arithmetic errors.

MITRE CWE Description
A heap overflow condition is a buffer overflow, where the buffer that can be overwritten is allocated in the heap portion of memory, generally meaning that the buffer was allocated using a routine such as malloc().
Common Consequences (3)
AvailabilityDoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU), DoS: Resource Consumption (Memory)
Buffer overflows generally lead to crashes. Other attacks leading to lack of availability are possible, including putting the program into an infinite loop.
Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability, Access ControlExecute Unauthorized Code or Commands, Bypass Protection Mechanism, Modify Memory
Buffer overflows often can be used to execute arbitrary code, which is usually outside the scope of a program's implicit security policy. Besides important user data, heap-based overflows can be used to overwrite function pointers that may be living in memory, pointing it to the attacker's code. Eve…
Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability, Access Control, OtherExecute Unauthorized Code or Commands, Bypass Protection Mechanism, Other
When the consequence is arbitrary code execution, this can often be used to subvert any other security service.
Mitigations (5)
Pre-design: Use a language or compiler that performs automatic bounds checking.
Architecture and DesignUse an abstraction library to abstract away risky APIs. Not a complete solution.
Operation, Build and CompilationUse automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index checking. D3-SFCV (Stack Frame Canary Validation) from D3FEND [REF-1334] discusses…
Effectiveness: Defense in Depth
Operation, Build and CompilationRun or compile the software using features or extensions that randomly arrange the positions of a program's executable and libraries in memory. Because this makes the addresses unpredictable, it can prevent an attacker from reliably jumping to exploitable code. Examples include Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) [REF-58] [REF-60] and Position-Independent Executables (PIE) [REF-64]. Imported…
Effectiveness: Defense in Depth
ImplementationImplement and perform bounds checking on input.
Examples (2)
While buffer overflow examples can be rather complex, it is possible to have very simple, yet still exploitable, heap-based buffer overflows:
#define BUFSIZE 256 int main(int argc, char **argv) { char *buf; buf = (char *)malloc(sizeof(char)*BUFSIZE); strcpy(buf, argv[1]); }
Bad · C
This example applies an encoding procedure to an input string and stores it into a buffer.
char * copy_input(char *user_supplied_string){ int i, dst_index; char *dst_buf = (char*)malloc(4*sizeof(char) * MAX_SIZE); if ( MAX_SIZE <= strlen(user_supplied_string) ){ die("user string too long, die evil hacker!"); } dst_index = 0; for ( i = 0; i < strlen(user_supplied_string); i++ ){ if( '&' == user_supplied_string[i] ){ dst_buf[dst_index++] = '&'; dst_buf[dst_index++] = 'a'; dst_buf[dst_index++] = 'm'; dst_buf[dst_index++] = 'p'; dst_buf[dst_index++] = ';'; } else if ('<' == user_supplied_string[i] ){ /* encode to &lt; */ } else dst_buf[dst_index++] = user_supplied_string[i]; } return ds
Bad · C
CVE IDTitleCVSSSeverityPublished
CVE-2023-33133 Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Microsoft Office 2019 7.8 High2023-06-13
CVE-2023-33129 Microsoft SharePoint Server Denial of Service Vulnerability — Microsoft SharePoint Enterprise Server 2016 6.5 Medium2023-06-13
CVE-2023-29372 Microsoft WDAC OLE DB provider for SQL Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Windows 10 Version 1809 8.8 High2023-06-13
CVE-2023-29370 Windows Media Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Windows 10 Version 1809 7.8 High2023-06-13
CVE-2023-29363 Windows Pragmatic General Multicast (PGM) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Windows 10 Version 1809 9.8 Critical2023-06-13
CVE-2023-29362 Remote Desktop Client Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Windows 10 Version 1809 8.8 High2023-06-13
CVE-2023-33146 Microsoft Office Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Microsoft Office 2019 for Mac 7.8 High2023-06-13
CVE-2023-27997 Fortinet FortiOS 缓冲区错误漏洞 — FortiOS-6K7K 9.2 Critical2023-06-13
CVE-2023-24014 Delta Electronics CNCSoft-B DOPSoft Heap-based buffer overflow — CNCSoft-B DOPSoft 7.8 High2023-06-07
CVE-2023-0667 Wireshark MSMMS parsing buffer overflow — Wireshark 9.8 -2023-06-07
CVE-2023-0666 Wireshark RTPS Parsing Buffer Overflow — Wireshark 9.8 -2023-06-07
CVE-2023-2157 ImageMagick 缓冲区错误漏洞 — ImageMagick 6.5 -2023-06-06
CVE-2023-29344 Microsoft Office Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Microsoft Office 2019 for Mac 7.8 High2023-06-05
CVE-2023-32324 OpenPrinting CUPS vulnerable to heap buffer overflow — cups 7.5 High2023-06-01
CVE-2023-2804 libjpeg-turbo 缓冲区错误漏洞 — libjpeg-turbo 6.5 -2023-05-25
CVE-2023-0854 多款Canon产品缓冲区错误漏洞 — Canon Office/Small Office Multifunction Printers and Laser Printers 9.8 Critical2023-05-11
CVE-2023-0851 多款Canon产品缓冲区错误漏洞 — Canon Office/Small Office Multifunction Printers and Laser Printers 9.8 Critical2023-05-11
CVE-2023-29283 ZDI-CAN-20361: Adobe Substance 3D Painter USD File Parsing Heap-based Buffer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Substance3D - Painter 7.8 High2023-05-11
CVE-2023-29341 AV1 Video Extension Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — AV1 Video Extension 7.8 High2023-05-09
CVE-2023-24948 Windows Bluetooth Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability — Windows 10 Version 1809 7.4 High2023-05-09
CVE-2023-24943 Windows Pragmatic General Multicast (PGM) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Windows 10 Version 1809 9.8 Critical2023-05-09
CVE-2023-27410 Siemens SCALANCE 安全漏洞 — SCALANCE LPE9403 2.7 Low2023-05-09
CVE-2023-2241 PoDoFo PdfXRefStreamParserObject.cpp readXRefStreamEntry heap-based overflow — PoDoFo 5.3 Medium2023-04-22
CVE-2023-26413 ZDI-CAN-20315: Adobe Substance 3D Designer USD File Parsing Heap-based Buffer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Substance3D - Designer 7.8 High2023-04-13
CVE-2023-26416 ZDI-CAN-20318: Adobe Substance 3D Designer DAE File Parsing Heap-based Buffer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Substance3D - Designer 7.8 High2023-04-13
CVE-2023-1906 ImageMagick 缓冲区错误漏洞 — ImageMagick 5.5 -2023-04-12
CVE-2023-26394 ZDI-CAN-20236: Adobe Substance 3D Stager USD File Parsing Heap-based Buffer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Substance3D - Stager 7.8 High2023-04-12
CVE-2023-28311 Microsoft Word Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Microsoft Office 2019 for Mac 7.8 High2023-04-11
CVE-2023-28262 Visual Studio Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability — Microsoft Visual Studio 2022 version 17.2 7.8 High2023-04-11
CVE-2023-28254 Windows DNS Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Windows Server 2019 7.2 High2023-04-11

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-122 (堆缓冲区溢出) represent 1895 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.