Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1000 CNY

100.0%

CWE-122 (堆缓冲区溢出) — Vulnerability Class 1895

1895 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-122 (堆缓冲区溢出). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-122 represents a critical memory safety weakness where an application writes data beyond the allocated boundaries of a heap-allocated buffer, typically created via functions like malloc. This vulnerability arises when developers fail to validate input lengths or perform insufficient bounds checking before copying data into dynamically allocated memory regions. Attackers exploit this flaw by crafting malicious inputs that exceed buffer limits, allowing them to overwrite adjacent heap metadata or control structures. Such overwrites can corrupt the heap manager’s internal state, leading to application crashes, data leakage, or arbitrary code execution by hijacking control flow. To prevent heap-based buffer overflows, developers must rigorously validate all input sizes against buffer capacities, utilize safe string handling libraries that enforce length limits, and employ modern memory-safe programming languages that automatically manage memory boundaries, thereby eliminating manual pointer arithmetic errors.

MITRE CWE Description
A heap overflow condition is a buffer overflow, where the buffer that can be overwritten is allocated in the heap portion of memory, generally meaning that the buffer was allocated using a routine such as malloc().
Common Consequences (3)
AvailabilityDoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU), DoS: Resource Consumption (Memory)
Buffer overflows generally lead to crashes. Other attacks leading to lack of availability are possible, including putting the program into an infinite loop.
Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability, Access ControlExecute Unauthorized Code or Commands, Bypass Protection Mechanism, Modify Memory
Buffer overflows often can be used to execute arbitrary code, which is usually outside the scope of a program's implicit security policy. Besides important user data, heap-based overflows can be used to overwrite function pointers that may be living in memory, pointing it to the attacker's code. Eve…
Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability, Access Control, OtherExecute Unauthorized Code or Commands, Bypass Protection Mechanism, Other
When the consequence is arbitrary code execution, this can often be used to subvert any other security service.
Mitigations (5)
Pre-design: Use a language or compiler that performs automatic bounds checking.
Architecture and DesignUse an abstraction library to abstract away risky APIs. Not a complete solution.
Operation, Build and CompilationUse automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index checking. D3-SFCV (Stack Frame Canary Validation) from D3FEND [REF-1334] discusses…
Effectiveness: Defense in Depth
Operation, Build and CompilationRun or compile the software using features or extensions that randomly arrange the positions of a program's executable and libraries in memory. Because this makes the addresses unpredictable, it can prevent an attacker from reliably jumping to exploitable code. Examples include Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) [REF-58] [REF-60] and Position-Independent Executables (PIE) [REF-64]. Imported…
Effectiveness: Defense in Depth
ImplementationImplement and perform bounds checking on input.
Examples (2)
While buffer overflow examples can be rather complex, it is possible to have very simple, yet still exploitable, heap-based buffer overflows:
#define BUFSIZE 256 int main(int argc, char **argv) { char *buf; buf = (char *)malloc(sizeof(char)*BUFSIZE); strcpy(buf, argv[1]); }
Bad · C
This example applies an encoding procedure to an input string and stores it into a buffer.
char * copy_input(char *user_supplied_string){ int i, dst_index; char *dst_buf = (char*)malloc(4*sizeof(char) * MAX_SIZE); if ( MAX_SIZE <= strlen(user_supplied_string) ){ die("user string too long, die evil hacker!"); } dst_index = 0; for ( i = 0; i < strlen(user_supplied_string); i++ ){ if( '&' == user_supplied_string[i] ){ dst_buf[dst_index++] = '&'; dst_buf[dst_index++] = 'a'; dst_buf[dst_index++] = 'm'; dst_buf[dst_index++] = 'p'; dst_buf[dst_index++] = ';'; } else if ('<' == user_supplied_string[i] ){ /* encode to &lt; */ } else dst_buf[dst_index++] = user_supplied_string[i]; } return ds
Bad · C
CVE IDTitleCVSSSeverityPublished
CVE-2023-28252 Windows Common Log File System Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability — Windows 10 Version 1809 7.8 High2023-04-11
CVE-2023-28275 Microsoft WDAC OLE DB provider for SQL Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Windows 10 Version 1809 8.8 High2023-04-11
CVE-2023-28269 Windows Boot Manager Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability — Windows 10 Version 1809 6.2 Medium2023-04-11
CVE-2023-28240 Windows Network Load Balancing Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Windows Server 2019 8.8 High2023-04-11
CVE-2023-28231 DHCP Server Service Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Windows Server 2019 8.8 High2023-04-11
CVE-2023-28227 Windows Bluetooth Driver Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Windows 10 Version 1809 7.5 High2023-04-11
CVE-2023-28225 Windows NTLM Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability — Windows 10 Version 1809 7.8 High2023-04-11
CVE-2023-24928 Microsoft PostScript and PCL6 Class Printer Driver Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Windows 10 Version 1809 8.8 High2023-04-11
CVE-2023-24926 Microsoft PostScript and PCL6 Class Printer Driver Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Windows 10 Version 1809 8.8 High2023-04-11
CVE-2023-24912 Windows Graphics Component Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability — Windows 10 Version 1809 7.8 High2023-04-11
CVE-2023-28292 Raw Image Extension Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Raw Image Extension 7.8 High2023-04-11
CVE-2023-28218 Windows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability — Windows 10 Version 1809 7.0 High2023-04-11
CVE-2023-23384 Microsoft SQL Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Microsoft SQL Server 2008 Service Pack 4 (QFE) 7.3 High2023-04-11
CVE-2023-21727 Remote Procedure Call Runtime Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Windows 10 Version 1809 8.8 High2023-04-11
CVE-2022-45115 Ichitaro 安全漏洞 — Ichitaro 7.8 High2023-04-05
CVE-2023-22660 JustSystems Ichitaro 安全漏洞 — Ichitaro 7.0 High2023-04-05
CVE-2023-0208 NVIDIA DCGM 缓冲区错误漏洞 — DCGM 8.4 High2023-04-01
CVE-2022-2848 Kepware KEPServerEX 缓冲区错误漏洞 — KEPServerEX 9.8 -2023-03-29
CVE-2022-43634 Netatalk安全漏洞 — Netatalk 9.8 -2023-03-29
CVE-2022-43648 D-Link DIR-3040 安全漏洞 — DIR-3040 8.8 -2023-03-29
CVE-2022-24672 Canon imageCLASS MF644Cdw 10.02 printers 缓冲区错误漏洞 — imageCLASS MF644Cdw 8.8 -2023-03-28
CVE-2023-25882 ZDI-CAN-19385: Adobe Dimension OBJ File Parsing Heap-based Buffer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Dimension 7.8 High2023-03-28
CVE-2023-25883 ZDI-CAN-19386: Adobe Dimension FBX File Parsing Heap-based Buffer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Dimension 7.8 High2023-03-28
CVE-2023-25885 ZDI-CAN-19480: Adobe Dimension USD File Parsing Heap-based Buffer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Dimension 7.8 High2023-03-28
CVE-2023-25890 ZDI-CAN-19493: Adobe Dimension USD File Parsing Heap-based Buffer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Dimension 7.8 High2023-03-28
CVE-2023-25895 ZDI-CAN-19540: Adobe Dimension USD File Parsing Heap-based Buffer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Dimension 7.8 High2023-03-28
CVE-2023-25897 ZDI-CAN-19520: Adobe Dimension USD File Parsing Heap-based Buffer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Dimension 7.8 High2023-03-28
CVE-2023-25898 ZDI-CAN-19521: Adobe Dimension USD File Parsing Heap-based Buffer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Dimension 7.8 High2023-03-28
CVE-2023-0210 Linux kernel 缓冲区错误漏洞 — Linux Kernel 7.5 -2023-03-27
CVE-2023-1655 Heap-based Buffer Overflow in gpac/gpac — gpac/gpac 7.8 -2023-03-27

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-122 (堆缓冲区溢出) represent 1895 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.