Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1000 CNY

100.0%

CWE-122 (堆缓冲区溢出) — Vulnerability Class 1864

1864 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-122 (堆缓冲区溢出). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-122 represents a critical memory safety weakness where an application writes data beyond the allocated boundaries of a heap-allocated buffer, typically created via functions like malloc. This vulnerability arises when developers fail to validate input lengths or perform insufficient bounds checking before copying data into dynamically allocated memory regions. Attackers exploit this flaw by crafting malicious inputs that exceed buffer limits, allowing them to overwrite adjacent heap metadata or control structures. Such overwrites can corrupt the heap manager’s internal state, leading to application crashes, data leakage, or arbitrary code execution by hijacking control flow. To prevent heap-based buffer overflows, developers must rigorously validate all input sizes against buffer capacities, utilize safe string handling libraries that enforce length limits, and employ modern memory-safe programming languages that automatically manage memory boundaries, thereby eliminating manual pointer arithmetic errors.

MITRE CWE Description
A heap overflow condition is a buffer overflow, where the buffer that can be overwritten is allocated in the heap portion of memory, generally meaning that the buffer was allocated using a routine such as malloc().
Common Consequences (3)
AvailabilityDoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU), DoS: Resource Consumption (Memory)
Buffer overflows generally lead to crashes. Other attacks leading to lack of availability are possible, including putting the program into an infinite loop.
Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability, Access ControlExecute Unauthorized Code or Commands, Bypass Protection Mechanism, Modify Memory
Buffer overflows often can be used to execute arbitrary code, which is usually outside the scope of a program's implicit security policy. Besides important user data, heap-based overflows can be used to overwrite function pointers that may be living in memory, pointing it to the attacker's code. Eve…
Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability, Access Control, OtherExecute Unauthorized Code or Commands, Bypass Protection Mechanism, Other
When the consequence is arbitrary code execution, this can often be used to subvert any other security service.
Mitigations (5)
Pre-design: Use a language or compiler that performs automatic bounds checking.
Architecture and DesignUse an abstraction library to abstract away risky APIs. Not a complete solution.
Operation, Build and CompilationUse automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index checking. D3-SFCV (Stack Frame Canary Validation) from D3FEND [REF-1334] discusses…
Effectiveness: Defense in Depth
Operation, Build and CompilationRun or compile the software using features or extensions that randomly arrange the positions of a program's executable and libraries in memory. Because this makes the addresses unpredictable, it can prevent an attacker from reliably jumping to exploitable code. Examples include Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) [REF-58] [REF-60] and Position-Independent Executables (PIE) [REF-64]. Imported…
Effectiveness: Defense in Depth
ImplementationImplement and perform bounds checking on input.
Examples (2)
While buffer overflow examples can be rather complex, it is possible to have very simple, yet still exploitable, heap-based buffer overflows:
#define BUFSIZE 256 int main(int argc, char **argv) { char *buf; buf = (char *)malloc(sizeof(char)*BUFSIZE); strcpy(buf, argv[1]); }
Bad · C
This example applies an encoding procedure to an input string and stores it into a buffer.
char * copy_input(char *user_supplied_string){ int i, dst_index; char *dst_buf = (char*)malloc(4*sizeof(char) * MAX_SIZE); if ( MAX_SIZE <= strlen(user_supplied_string) ){ die("user string too long, die evil hacker!"); } dst_index = 0; for ( i = 0; i < strlen(user_supplied_string); i++ ){ if( '&' == user_supplied_string[i] ){ dst_buf[dst_index++] = '&'; dst_buf[dst_index++] = 'a'; dst_buf[dst_index++] = 'm'; dst_buf[dst_index++] = 'p'; dst_buf[dst_index++] = ';'; } else if ('<' == user_supplied_string[i] ){ /* encode to &lt; */ } else dst_buf[dst_index++] = user_supplied_string[i]; } return ds
Bad · C
CVE IDTitleCVSSSeverityPublished
CVE-2022-46290 Babel 缓冲区错误漏洞 — Open Babel 9.8 Critical2023-07-21
CVE-2022-46289 Babel 缓冲区错误漏洞 — Open Babel 9.8 Critical2023-07-21
CVE-2023-3463 GE Digital CIMPLICITY Heap-based Buffer Overflow — CIMPLICITY 6.6 Medium2023-07-19
CVE-2022-24834 Heap overflow issue with the Lua cjson library used by Redis — redis 7.0 High2023-07-13
CVE-2023-24474 Server deserialization missing boundary checks - heap overflow in communication between server and controller — Experion Server 7.5 High2023-07-13
CVE-2023-35374 Paint 3D Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Paint 3D 7.8 High2023-07-11
CVE-2023-35305 Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability — Windows 10 Version 1809 7.8 High2023-07-11
CVE-2023-35304 Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability — Windows 10 Version 1809 7.8 High2023-07-11
CVE-2023-35302 Microsoft PostScript and PCL6 Class Printer Driver Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Windows 10 Version 1809 8.8 High2023-07-11
CVE-2023-32083 Microsoft Failover Cluster Information Disclosure Vulnerability — Windows Server 2019 6.5 Medium2023-07-11
CVE-2023-35363 Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability — Windows 10 Version 1809 7.8 High2023-07-11
CVE-2023-35350 Windows Active Directory Certificate Services (AD CS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Windows Server 2019 7.2 High2023-07-11
CVE-2023-35337 Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability — Windows Server 2022 7.8 High2023-07-11
CVE-2023-32047 Paint 3D Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Paint 3D 7.8 High2023-07-11
CVE-2023-33152 Microsoft ActiveX Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Microsoft Office 2019 7.0 High2023-07-11
CVE-2023-36824 Heap overflow in COMMAND GETKEYS and ACL evaluation in Redis — redis 7.4 High2023-07-11
CVE-2023-37247 Siemens Tecnomatix Plant Simulation 缓冲区错误漏洞 — Tecnomatix Plant Simulation V2201 7.8 High2023-07-11
CVE-2023-37246 Siemens Tecnomatix Plant Simulation 缓冲区错误漏洞 — Tecnomatix Plant Simulation V2201 7.8 High2023-07-11
CVE-2023-34432 Heap-buffer-overflow in src/formats_i.c — sox 7.8 High2023-07-10
CVE-2023-34318 Heap-buffer-overflow in src/hcom.c — sox 7.8 High2023-07-10
CVE-2022-48512 Huawei HarmonyOS 资源管理错误漏洞 — HarmonyOS 7.5 -2023-07-06
CVE-2023-27390 Diagon 缓冲区错误漏洞 — Diagon 7.8 High2023-07-05
CVE-2023-32028 Microsoft SQL OLE DB Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Microsoft OLE DB Driver 19 for SQL Server 7.8 High2023-06-16
CVE-2023-32027 Microsoft ODBC Driver for SQL Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Microsoft ODBC Driver 17 for SQL Server on Linux 7.8 High2023-06-16
CVE-2023-32026 Microsoft ODBC Driver for SQL Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Microsoft ODBC Driver 17 for SQL Server on MacOS 7.8 High2023-06-16
CVE-2023-32025 Microsoft ODBC Driver for SQL Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Microsoft ODBC Driver 17 for SQL Server on Linux 7.8 High2023-06-16
CVE-2023-3291 Heap-based Buffer Overflow in gpac/gpac — gpac/gpac 7.8 -2023-06-16
CVE-2023-34474 ImageMagick 缓冲区错误漏洞 — ImageMagick 5.5 -2023-06-16
CVE-2023-24897 .NET, .NET Framework, and Visual Studio Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Microsoft Visual Studio 2017 version 15.9 (includes 15.0 - 15.8) 7.8 High2023-06-14
CVE-2023-33133 Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Microsoft Office 2019 7.8 High2023-06-13

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-122 (堆缓冲区溢出) represent 1864 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.