Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1000 CNY

100.0%

CWE-121 (栈缓冲区溢出) — Vulnerability Class 2518

2518 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-121 (栈缓冲区溢出). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-121 represents a critical memory safety weakness where program data exceeds the allocated bounds of a stack-allocated buffer, corrupting adjacent memory structures. Attackers typically exploit this vulnerability by injecting malicious payloads that overwrite the function’s return address or saved frame pointer, thereby hijacking control flow to execute arbitrary code with the privileges of the compromised process. This exploitation is particularly dangerous because stack buffers are local variables, making the attack surface common in low-level languages like C and C++. Developers mitigate this risk by enforcing strict input validation, utilizing safe string handling functions that prevent unbounded writes, and adopting modern programming languages with automatic memory management. Additionally, implementing compiler-level protections such as stack canaries and Address Space Layout Randomization significantly raises the barrier for successful exploitation, ensuring system integrity remains intact against buffer overflow attempts.

MITRE CWE Description
A stack-based buffer overflow condition is a condition where the buffer being overwritten is allocated on the stack (i.e., is a local variable or, rarely, a parameter to a function).
Common Consequences (3)
AvailabilityModify Memory, DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU), DoS: Resource Consumption (Memory)
Buffer overflows generally lead to crashes. Other attacks leading to lack of availability are possible, including putting the program into an infinite loop.
Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability, Access ControlModify Memory, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands, Bypass Protection Mechanism
Buffer overflows often can be used to execute arbitrary code, which is usually outside the scope of a program's implicit security policy.
Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability, Access Control, OtherModify Memory, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands, Bypass Protection Mechanism, Other
When the consequence is arbitrary code execution, this can often be used to subvert any other security service.
Mitigations (5)
Operation, Build and CompilationUse automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index checking. D3-SFCV (Stack Frame Canary Validation) from D3FEND [REF-1334] discusses…
Effectiveness: Defense in Depth
Architecture and DesignUse an abstraction library to abstract away risky APIs. Not a complete solution.
ImplementationImplement and perform bounds checking on input.
ImplementationDo not use dangerous functions such as gets. Use safer, equivalent functions which check for boundary errors.
Operation, Build and CompilationRun or compile the software using features or extensions that randomly arrange the positions of a program's executable and libraries in memory. Because this makes the addresses unpredictable, it can prevent an attacker from reliably jumping to exploitable code. Examples include Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) [REF-58] [REF-60] and Position-Independent Executables (PIE) [REF-64]. Imported…
Effectiveness: Defense in Depth
Examples (2)
While buffer overflow examples can be rather complex, it is possible to have very simple, yet still exploitable, stack-based buffer overflows:
#define BUFSIZE 256 int main(int argc, char **argv) { char buf[BUFSIZE]; strcpy(buf, argv[1]); }
Bad · C
This example takes an IP address from a user, verifies that it is well formed and then looks up the hostname and copies it into a buffer.
void host_lookup(char *user_supplied_addr){ struct hostent *hp; in_addr_t *addr; char hostname[64]; in_addr_t inet_addr(const char *cp); /*routine that ensures user_supplied_addr is in the right format for conversion */ validate_addr_form(user_supplied_addr); addr = inet_addr(user_supplied_addr); hp = gethostbyaddr( addr, sizeof(struct in_addr), AF_INET); strcpy(hostname, hp->h_name); }
Bad · C
CVE IDTitleCVSSSeverityPublished
CVE-2018-17910 Advantech WebAccess 缓冲区错误漏洞 — WebAccess Versions 8.3.2 and prior. 7.8 -2018-10-29
CVE-2018-14816 Advantech WebAccess 缓冲区错误漏洞 — Advantech WebAccess 9.8 -2018-10-23
CVE-2018-14807 Opto 22 PAC Control Basic和PAC Control Professional 缓冲区错误漏洞 — PAC Control Basic and PAC Control Professional 9.8 -2018-10-18
CVE-2018-17911 LAquis SCADA 缓冲区错误漏洞 — LAquis SCADA 8.8 -2018-10-17
CVE-2018-10839 QEMU 输入验证错误漏洞 — Qemu-kvm 5.5 -2018-10-16
CVE-2018-17929 Delta Industrial Automation TPEditor 缓冲区错误漏洞 — Delta Industrial Automation TPEditor 7.8 -2018-10-11
CVE-2018-14818 Wecon PI Studio HMI和PI Studio 缓冲区错误漏洞 — PI Studio HMI 9.8 -2018-10-08
CVE-2018-14800 Delta Electronics ISPSoft 安全漏洞 — ISPSoft 7.8 -2018-10-03
CVE-2018-14802 多款Fuji Electric产品缓冲区错误漏洞 — FRENIC LOADER of FRENIC-Mini (C1), FRENIC-Mini (C2), FRENIC-Eco, FRENIC-Multi, FRENIC-MEGA, FRENIC-Ace 9.8 -2018-10-01
CVE-2018-14823 Fuji Electric V-Server VPR 缓冲区错误漏洞 — V-Server 9.8 -2018-09-26
CVE-2018-10602 WECON LeviStudioU 缓冲区错误漏洞 — LeviStudioU 8.8 -2018-09-26
CVE-2018-14318 Samsung Galaxy S8 输入验证错误漏洞 — Samsung Galaxy S8 8.8 -2018-09-25
CVE-2018-14633 Linux kernel 缓冲区错误漏洞 — kernel 7.7 -2018-09-25
CVE-2018-14829 Rockwell Automation RSLinx Classic 安全漏洞 — RSLinx Classic 9.8 -2018-09-20
CVE-2018-14792 WECON PLC Editor 安全漏洞 — PLC Editor 8.3 -2018-09-19
CVE-2018-10907 Red Hat glusterfs服务器缓冲区错误漏洞 — glusterfs 8.8 -2018-09-04
CVE-2018-14793 Emerson Electric DeltaV 缓冲区错误漏洞 — DeltaV 8.4 -2018-08-21
CVE-2018-10636 Delta Electronics CNCSoft和ScreenEditor 缓冲区错误漏洞 — CNCSoft with ScreenEditor 8.8 -2018-08-13
CVE-2017-15118 QEMU 缓冲区错误漏洞 — Qemu 9.8 -2018-07-27
CVE-2017-15101 liblouis 安全漏洞 — liblouis 9.8 -2018-07-27
CVE-2017-2630 QEMU 缓冲区错误漏洞 — Qemu: 9.8 -2018-07-27
CVE-2018-10628 AVEVA InTouch 安全漏洞 — InTouch 9.8 -2018-07-24
CVE-2017-3223 Dahua IP camera products using firmware versions prior to V2.400.0000.14.R.20170713 include a version of the Sonia web interface that may be vulnerable to a stack buffer overflow — IP Camera 9.8 -2018-07-24
CVE-2018-10620 AVEVA InduSoft Web Studio和InTouch Machine Edition 缓冲区错误漏洞 — InduSoft Web Studio 9.8 -2018-07-19
CVE-2018-1046 pdns 缓冲区错误漏洞 — pdns 7.8 -2018-07-16
CVE-2016-6563 D-Link DIR routers contain a stack-based buffer overflow in the HNAP Login action — DIR-823 9.8 -2018-07-13
CVE-2018-8847 Eaton 9000X DriveA 缓冲区错误漏洞 — Eaton 9000X Drive 9.8 -2018-07-13
CVE-2018-10594 Delta Industrial Automation COMMGR 缓冲区错误漏洞 — Delta Industrial Automation COMMGR and accompanying PLC Simulators (DVPSimulator EH2, EH3, ES2, SE, SS2 and AHSIM_5x0, AHSIM_5x1) 9.8 -2018-06-26
CVE-2018-11447 Siemens SCALANCE M875 跨站请求伪造漏洞 — SCALANCE M875 8.8 -2018-06-26
CVE-2018-10621 Delta Industrial Automation DOPSoft 缓冲区错误漏洞 — Delta Industrial Automation DOPSoft 9.8 -2018-06-18

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-121 (栈缓冲区溢出) represent 2518 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.