Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1000 CNY

100.0%

CWE-121 (栈缓冲区溢出) — Vulnerability Class 2518

2518 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-121 (栈缓冲区溢出). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-121 represents a critical memory safety weakness where program data exceeds the allocated bounds of a stack-allocated buffer, corrupting adjacent memory structures. Attackers typically exploit this vulnerability by injecting malicious payloads that overwrite the function’s return address or saved frame pointer, thereby hijacking control flow to execute arbitrary code with the privileges of the compromised process. This exploitation is particularly dangerous because stack buffers are local variables, making the attack surface common in low-level languages like C and C++. Developers mitigate this risk by enforcing strict input validation, utilizing safe string handling functions that prevent unbounded writes, and adopting modern programming languages with automatic memory management. Additionally, implementing compiler-level protections such as stack canaries and Address Space Layout Randomization significantly raises the barrier for successful exploitation, ensuring system integrity remains intact against buffer overflow attempts.

MITRE CWE Description
A stack-based buffer overflow condition is a condition where the buffer being overwritten is allocated on the stack (i.e., is a local variable or, rarely, a parameter to a function).
Common Consequences (3)
AvailabilityModify Memory, DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU), DoS: Resource Consumption (Memory)
Buffer overflows generally lead to crashes. Other attacks leading to lack of availability are possible, including putting the program into an infinite loop.
Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability, Access ControlModify Memory, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands, Bypass Protection Mechanism
Buffer overflows often can be used to execute arbitrary code, which is usually outside the scope of a program's implicit security policy.
Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability, Access Control, OtherModify Memory, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands, Bypass Protection Mechanism, Other
When the consequence is arbitrary code execution, this can often be used to subvert any other security service.
Mitigations (5)
Operation, Build and CompilationUse automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index checking. D3-SFCV (Stack Frame Canary Validation) from D3FEND [REF-1334] discusses…
Effectiveness: Defense in Depth
Architecture and DesignUse an abstraction library to abstract away risky APIs. Not a complete solution.
ImplementationImplement and perform bounds checking on input.
ImplementationDo not use dangerous functions such as gets. Use safer, equivalent functions which check for boundary errors.
Operation, Build and CompilationRun or compile the software using features or extensions that randomly arrange the positions of a program's executable and libraries in memory. Because this makes the addresses unpredictable, it can prevent an attacker from reliably jumping to exploitable code. Examples include Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) [REF-58] [REF-60] and Position-Independent Executables (PIE) [REF-64]. Imported…
Effectiveness: Defense in Depth
Examples (2)
While buffer overflow examples can be rather complex, it is possible to have very simple, yet still exploitable, stack-based buffer overflows:
#define BUFSIZE 256 int main(int argc, char **argv) { char buf[BUFSIZE]; strcpy(buf, argv[1]); }
Bad · C
This example takes an IP address from a user, verifies that it is well formed and then looks up the hostname and copies it into a buffer.
void host_lookup(char *user_supplied_addr){ struct hostent *hp; in_addr_t *addr; char hostname[64]; in_addr_t inet_addr(const char *cp); /*routine that ensures user_supplied_addr is in the right format for conversion */ validate_addr_form(user_supplied_addr); addr = inet_addr(user_supplied_addr); hp = gethostbyaddr( addr, sizeof(struct in_addr), AF_INET); strcpy(hostname, hp->h_name); }
Bad · C
CVE IDTitleCVSSSeverityPublished
CVE-2020-1609 Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved: A vulnerability in JDHCPD allows an attacker to send crafted IPv6 packets and arbitrarily execute commands on the target device. — Junos OS 8.8 High2020-01-15
CVE-2020-1605 Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved: A vulnerability in JDHCPD allows an attacker to send crafted IPv4 packets and arbitrarily execute commands on the target device. — Junos OS 8.8 High2020-01-15
CVE-2019-13537 多款Schneider Electric产品 IEC870IP driver 缓冲区错误漏洞 — Vijeo Citect and Citect SCADA 7.5 -2020-01-14
CVE-2019-17146 D-Link DCS-960L 访问控制错误漏洞 — DCS-960L 9.8 -2020-01-07
CVE-2020-5204 Buffer overflow vulnerability in uftpd — uftpd 6.5 Medium2020-01-06
CVE-2019-15695 TigerVNC 代码问题漏洞 — TigerVNC 7.2 -2019-12-26
CVE-2019-18236 WECON Technologies PLC Editor 缓冲区错误漏洞 — WECON PLC Editor 7.8 -2019-12-23
CVE-2019-7482 SonicWall SMA100 缓冲区错误漏洞 — SMA100 9.8 -2019-12-19
CVE-2019-18257 Advantech DiagAnywhere Server 缓冲区错误漏洞 — Advantech DiagAnywhere Server 9.8 -2019-12-17
CVE-2019-3951 Advantech WebAccess 缓冲区错误漏洞 — Advantech WebAccess/SCADA 9.8 -2019-12-12
CVE-2019-18310 Siemens SPPA-T3000 缓冲区错误漏洞 — SPPA-T3000 MS3000 Migration Server 7.5 -2019-12-12
CVE-2019-19334 libyang 缓冲区错误漏洞 — libyang 9.8 -2019-12-06
CVE-2019-19333 libyang 缓冲区错误漏洞 — libyang 9.8 -2019-12-06
CVE-2019-14897 Linux kernel Marvell WiFi chip driver 缓冲区错误漏洞 — kernel 8.8 -2019-11-29
CVE-2019-11931 Facebook WhatsApp 缓冲区错误漏洞 — WhatsApp for Android 7.8 -2019-11-14
CVE-2019-15683 TurboVNC 缓冲区错误漏洞 — TurboVNC 8.8 -2019-10-29
CVE-2019-17145 Foxit PhantomPDF 缓冲区错误漏洞 — PhantomPDF 8.8 -2019-10-25
CVE-2019-3729 Dell RSA BSAFE Micro Edition Suite 缓冲区错误漏洞 — RSA BSAFE MES 2.4 -2019-09-30
CVE-2019-13556 Advantech WebAccess 缓冲区错误漏洞 — WebAccess 8.8 -2019-09-18
CVE-2019-13548 3S-Smart Software Solutions CODESYS V3 web server 缓冲区错误漏洞 — CODESYS V3 web server 9.8 -2019-09-13
CVE-2019-13540 Delta Electronics TPEditor 缓冲区错误漏洞 — TPEditor 7.8 -2019-09-11
CVE-2019-13518 EZAutomation EZ Touch Editor 缓冲区错误漏洞 — EZ Touch Editor 7.8 -2019-09-04
CVE-2019-13156 Naver Cloud Explorer 缓冲区错误漏洞 — NDrive 7.5 -2019-09-03
CVE-2019-5041 Aspose Aspose.Words 缓冲区错误漏洞 — Aspose 8.8 -2019-08-21
CVE-2019-5038 Nest Labs Openweave-core Weave工具缓冲区错误漏洞 — Nest Labs 7.8 -2019-08-20
CVE-2019-13520 Fuji Electric Alpha5 Smart Loader 缓冲区错误漏洞 — Alpha5 Smart Loader 7.8 -2019-08-20
CVE-2014-8184 Liblouis 缓冲区错误漏洞 — liblouis 7.8 -2019-08-02
CVE-2019-10974 NREL EnergyPlus 缓冲区错误漏洞 — EnergyPlus--2019-07-25
CVE-2019-0053 Junos OS: Insufficient validation of environment variables in telnet client may lead to stack-based buffer overflow — Junos OS 7.8 -2019-07-11
CVE-2019-10193 Redis hyperloglog data structure 缓冲区错误漏洞 — redis 7.2 -2019-07-11

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-121 (栈缓冲区溢出) represent 2518 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.