Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1000 CNY

100.0%

CWE-121 (栈缓冲区溢出) — Vulnerability Class 2518

2518 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-121 (栈缓冲区溢出). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-121 represents a critical memory safety weakness where program data exceeds the allocated bounds of a stack-allocated buffer, corrupting adjacent memory structures. Attackers typically exploit this vulnerability by injecting malicious payloads that overwrite the function’s return address or saved frame pointer, thereby hijacking control flow to execute arbitrary code with the privileges of the compromised process. This exploitation is particularly dangerous because stack buffers are local variables, making the attack surface common in low-level languages like C and C++. Developers mitigate this risk by enforcing strict input validation, utilizing safe string handling functions that prevent unbounded writes, and adopting modern programming languages with automatic memory management. Additionally, implementing compiler-level protections such as stack canaries and Address Space Layout Randomization significantly raises the barrier for successful exploitation, ensuring system integrity remains intact against buffer overflow attempts.

MITRE CWE Description
A stack-based buffer overflow condition is a condition where the buffer being overwritten is allocated on the stack (i.e., is a local variable or, rarely, a parameter to a function).
Common Consequences (3)
AvailabilityModify Memory, DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU), DoS: Resource Consumption (Memory)
Buffer overflows generally lead to crashes. Other attacks leading to lack of availability are possible, including putting the program into an infinite loop.
Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability, Access ControlModify Memory, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands, Bypass Protection Mechanism
Buffer overflows often can be used to execute arbitrary code, which is usually outside the scope of a program's implicit security policy.
Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability, Access Control, OtherModify Memory, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands, Bypass Protection Mechanism, Other
When the consequence is arbitrary code execution, this can often be used to subvert any other security service.
Mitigations (5)
Operation, Build and CompilationUse automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index checking. D3-SFCV (Stack Frame Canary Validation) from D3FEND [REF-1334] discusses…
Effectiveness: Defense in Depth
Architecture and DesignUse an abstraction library to abstract away risky APIs. Not a complete solution.
ImplementationImplement and perform bounds checking on input.
ImplementationDo not use dangerous functions such as gets. Use safer, equivalent functions which check for boundary errors.
Operation, Build and CompilationRun or compile the software using features or extensions that randomly arrange the positions of a program's executable and libraries in memory. Because this makes the addresses unpredictable, it can prevent an attacker from reliably jumping to exploitable code. Examples include Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) [REF-58] [REF-60] and Position-Independent Executables (PIE) [REF-64]. Imported…
Effectiveness: Defense in Depth
Examples (2)
While buffer overflow examples can be rather complex, it is possible to have very simple, yet still exploitable, stack-based buffer overflows:
#define BUFSIZE 256 int main(int argc, char **argv) { char buf[BUFSIZE]; strcpy(buf, argv[1]); }
Bad · C
This example takes an IP address from a user, verifies that it is well formed and then looks up the hostname and copies it into a buffer.
void host_lookup(char *user_supplied_addr){ struct hostent *hp; in_addr_t *addr; char hostname[64]; in_addr_t inet_addr(const char *cp); /*routine that ensures user_supplied_addr is in the right format for conversion */ validate_addr_form(user_supplied_addr); addr = inet_addr(user_supplied_addr); hp = gethostbyaddr( addr, sizeof(struct in_addr), AF_INET); strcpy(hostname, hp->h_name); }
Bad · C
CVE IDTitleCVSSSeverityPublished
CVE-2022-27784 Adobe After Effects Stack Buffer Overflow Could Lead To RCE — After Effects 7.8 High2022-05-06
CVE-2022-27783 Adobe After Effects Stack Buffer Overflow Could Lead To RCE — After Effects 7.8 High2022-05-06
CVE-2021-38433 RTI Connext DDS Professional and Connext DDS Secure Stack-based Buffer Overflow — Connext DDS Professional 6.6 Medium2022-05-05
CVE-2021-38427 RTI Connext DDS Professional and Connext DDS Secure Stack-based Buffer Overflow — Connext DDS Professional 6.6 Medium2022-05-05
CVE-2022-20753 Cisco Small Business RV Series Routers Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Cisco Small Business RV Series Router Firmware 4.7 Medium2022-05-04
CVE-2022-25785 Buffer overrun — SiteManager 6.6 Medium2022-05-04
CVE-2021-42529 XMP-Toolkit SDK Stack-based Buffer Overflow Could Lead To Arbitrary Code Execution — XMP Toolkit 7.8 High2022-05-02
CVE-2021-42531 XMP-Toolkit SDK Stack-based Buffer Overflow Could Lead To Arbitrary Code Execution — XMP Toolkit 7.8 High2022-05-02
CVE-2021-42530 XMP-Toolkit SDK Stack-based Buffer Overflow Could Lead To Arbitrary Code Execution — XMP Toolkit 7.8 High2022-05-02
CVE-2021-42532 XMP-Toolkit SDK Stack-based Buffer Overflow Could Lead To Arbitrary Code Execution — XMP Toolkit 7.8 High2022-05-02
CVE-2021-34587 Bender Charge Controller: Long URL could lead to webserver crash — CC612 5.3 Medium2022-04-27
CVE-2022-21228 ICSA-22-090-03 Fuji Electric Alpha5 — Alpha5 7.8 High2022-04-12
CVE-2022-28772 SAP Web Dispatcher 缓冲区错误漏洞 — SAP NetWeaver (Internet Communication Manager) 7.5 -2022-04-12
CVE-2021-32040 Large aggregation pipelines with a specific stage can crash mongod under default configuration — MongoDB Server 6.5 Medium2022-04-12
CVE-2022-25753 多款 Siemens 产品 缓冲区错误漏洞 — SCALANCE X302-7 EEC (230V) 7.5 -2022-04-12
CVE-2022-1211 tildearrow Furnace FUR to VGM Converter stack-based overflow — Furnace 6.3 Medium2022-04-03
CVE-2022-1068 Modbus Tools Modbus Slave Stack-Based Buffer Overflow — Modbus Slave 5.5 Medium2022-04-01
CVE-2022-26419 Rockwell Automation Studio 5000 Logix Designer Code Injection — CX-Position 7.8 High2022-04-01
CVE-2021-32976 Moxa NPort IAW5000A-I/O Series Serial Device Server Stack-based Buffer Overflow — NPort IAW5000A-I/O series firmware 9.8 Critical2022-04-01
CVE-2019-12266 Stack buffer overflow in Wyze Cam Pan v2, Cam v2 and Cam v3 — Cam Pan v2 7.6 High2022-03-30
CVE-2021-23851 Buffer Overflow vulnerability in the recovery image web-based interface — CPP Firmware 6.8 Medium2022-03-30
CVE-2021-23850 Buffer Overflow vulnerability in the recovery image telnet server — CPP Firmware 6.8 Medium2022-03-30
CVE-2022-22274 SonicOS 缓冲区错误漏洞 — SonicOS 9.8 -2022-03-25
CVE-2022-25949 KINGSOFT Internet Security 缓冲区错误漏洞 — KINGSOFT Internet Security 9 Plus 7.8 -2022-03-17
CVE-2022-24094 Adobe After Effects Stack-based Buffer Overflow Arbitrary code execution — After Effects 7.8 High2022-03-11
CVE-2022-24095 Adobe After Effects Stack-based Buffer Overflow Arbitrary code execution — After Effects 7.8 High2022-03-11
CVE-2021-23206 HTMLDOC 缓冲区错误漏洞 — htmldoc 7.8 -2022-03-02
CVE-2022-25170 ICSA-22-055-01 FATEK Automation FvDesigner — FvDesigner 7.8 High2022-02-25
CVE-2021-46699 Siemens Simcenter Femap 缓冲区错误漏洞 — Simcenter Femap 7.8 -2022-02-22
CVE-2022-24355 Tp-link TP-Link TL-WR940N 安全漏洞 — TL-WR940N 8.8 -2022-02-18

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-121 (栈缓冲区溢出) represent 2518 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.