Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1000 CNY

100.0%

CWE-120 (未进行输入大小检查的缓冲区拷贝(传统缓冲区溢出)) — Vulnerability Class 1767

1767 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-120 (未进行输入大小检查的缓冲区拷贝(传统缓冲区溢出)). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-120 represents a critical memory safety vulnerability where software copies data into a fixed-size buffer without validating the input’s length against the destination’s capacity. This classic buffer overflow occurs when an attacker supplies input exceeding the allocated memory space, causing data to spill into adjacent memory regions. Exploitation typically involves injecting malicious code or altering program control flow, such as overwriting return addresses to execute arbitrary commands. Developers prevent this weakness by implementing rigorous bounds checking before any copy operation, ensuring the input size never exceeds the buffer’s limits. Utilizing safer, language-specific functions that automatically handle size verification, or adopting modern programming languages with built-in memory safety features, effectively mitigates this risk and preserves application integrity against memory corruption attacks.

MITRE CWE Description
The product copies an input buffer to an output buffer without verifying that the size of the input buffer is less than the size of the output buffer.
Common Consequences (2)
Integrity, Confidentiality, AvailabilityModify Memory, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands
Buffer overflows often can be used to execute arbitrary code, which is usually outside the scope of the product's implicit security policy. This can often be used to subvert any other security service.
AvailabilityModify Memory, DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU)
Buffer overflows generally lead to crashes. Other attacks leading to lack of availability are possible, including putting the product into an infinite loop.
Mitigations (5)
RequirementsUse a language that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, many languages that perform their own memory management, such as Java and Perl, are not subject to buffer overflows. Other languages, such as Ada and C#, typically provide overflow protection, but the protection can be disabled by the programmer. Be wary that a lan…
Architecture and DesignUse a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. Examples include the Safe C String Library (SafeStr) by Messier and Viega [REF-57], and the Strsafe.h library from Microsoft [REF-56]. These libraries provide safer versions of overflow-prone string-handling functions.
Operation, Build and CompilationUse automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index checking. D3-SFCV (Stack Frame Canary Validation) from D3FEND [REF-1334] discusses…
Effectiveness: Defense in Depth
ImplementationConsider adhering to the following rules when allocating and managing an application's memory: Double check that your buffer is as large as you specify. When using functions that accept a number of bytes to copy, such as strncpy(), be aware that if the destination buffer size is equal to the source buffer size, it may not NULL-terminate the string. Check buffer boundaries if accessing the buffer i…
ImplementationAssume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range…
Examples (2)
The following code asks the user to enter their last name and then attempts to store the value entered in the last_name array.
char last_name[20]; printf ("Enter your last name: "); scanf ("%s", last_name);
Bad · C
The following code attempts to create a local copy of a buffer to perform some manipulations to the data.
void manipulate_string(char * string){ char buf[24]; strcpy(buf, string); ... }
Bad · C
CVE IDTitleCVSSSeverityPublished
CVE-2018-25237 Hirschmann HiSecOS Buffer Overflow via HTTPS Login — Hirschmann HiSecOS Classic Firewall (EAGLE, EAGLE One) 9.8 Critical2026-04-03
CVE-2026-34124 Denial of Service via Path Expansion Overflow in HTTP Service in TP-Link Tapo C520WS — Tapo C520WS v2.6 6.5AIMediumAI2026-04-02
CVE-2026-5164 Virtio-win: virtio-win: denial of service via unvalidated descriptor count in unmap request — Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 6.7 Medium2026-03-30
CVE-2026-1679 net: eswifi socket send payload length not bounded — Zephyr 7.3 High2026-03-27
CVE-2026-4976 Totolink LR350 cstecgi.cgi setWiFiGuestCfg buffer overflow — LR350 8.8 High2026-03-27
CVE-2026-4862 UTT HiPER 1250GW Parameter formConfigDnsFilterGlobal strcpy buffer overflow — HiPER 1250GW 8.8 High2026-03-26
CVE-2026-4565 Tenda AC21 SetNetControlList formSetQosBand buffer overflow — AC21 8.8 High2026-03-23
CVE-2026-4488 UTT HiPER 1250GW setSysAdm strcpy buffer overflow — HiPER 1250GW 8.8 High2026-03-20
CVE-2026-4487 UTT HiPER 1200GW websHostFilter strcpy buffer overflow — HiPER 1200GW 8.8 High2026-03-20
CVE-2026-27459 pyOpenSSL DTLS cookie callback buffer overflow — pyopenssl 9.8 -2026-03-17
CVE-2026-4318 UTT HiPER 810G formApLbConfig strcpy buffer overflow — HiPER 810G 8.8 High2026-03-17
CVE-2026-4227 LB-LINK BL-WR9000 get_hidessid_cfg sub_44D844 buffer overflow — BL-WR9000 8.8 High2026-03-16
CVE-2026-0849 crypto: ATAES132A response length allows stack buffer overflow — Zephyr 3.8 Low2026-03-14
CVE-2026-32706 PX4 autopilot has a global buffer overflow in crsf_rc via oversized variable-length known packet — PX4-Autopilot 7.1 High2026-03-13
CVE-2025-71263 AT&T Bell Labs UNIX 安全漏洞 — UNIX 7.4 High2026-03-13
CVE-2026-32746 GNU Inetutils 安全漏洞 — inetutils 9.8 Critical2026-03-13
CVE-2026-31795 iccDEV has a stack buffer overflow write in CIccXform3DLut::Apply() — iccDEV 7.8 High2026-03-10
CVE-2026-30987 iccDEV has a stack buffer overflow in CIccTagNum<(icTagTypeSignature)>::GetValues() — iccDEV 7.8 High2026-03-10
CVE-2026-30985 iccDEV has a heap-based buffer overflow write in CIccMatrixMath::SetRange() — iccDEV 7.8 High2026-03-10
CVE-2026-30983 iccDEV has a stack buffer overflow in icFixXml() — iccDEV 7.8 High2026-03-10
CVE-2026-30981 iccDEV has a heap-buffer-overflow read in CIccXmlArrayType<> — iccDEV 6.1 Medium2026-03-10
CVE-2026-30979 iccDEV has a heap-based buffer overflow in CIccCalculatorFunc::InitSelectOp() — iccDEV 7.8 High2026-03-10
CVE-2026-22627 Fortinet FortiSwitchAXFixed 安全漏洞 — FortiSwitchAXFixed 7.7 High2026-03-10
CVE-2026-3815 UTT HiPER 810G formApMail strcpy buffer overflow — HiPER 810G 8.8 High2026-03-09
CVE-2026-3814 UTT HiPER 810G getOneApConfTempEntry strcpy buffer overflow — HiPER 810G 8.8 High2026-03-09
CVE-2026-3701 H3C Magic B1 aspForm Edit_BasicSSID_5G buffer overflow — Magic B1 8.8 High2026-03-08
CVE-2026-3700 UTT HiPER 810G formConfigDnsFilterGlobal strcpy buffer overflow — HiPER 810G 8.8 High2026-03-08
CVE-2026-3699 UTT HiPER 810G formRemoteControl strcpy buffer overflow — HiPER 810G 8.8 High2026-03-08
CVE-2026-3698 UTT HiPER 810G NTP strcpy buffer overflow — HiPER 810G 8.8 High2026-03-08
CVE-2026-20100 Cisco Secure Firewall Adaptive Security Appliance和Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense 安全漏洞 — Cisco Secure Firewall Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software 7.7 High2026-03-04

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-120 (未进行输入大小检查的缓冲区拷贝(传统缓冲区溢出)) represent 1767 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.