Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1000 CNY

100.0%

CWE-120 (未进行输入大小检查的缓冲区拷贝(传统缓冲区溢出)) — Vulnerability Class 1767

1767 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-120 (未进行输入大小检查的缓冲区拷贝(传统缓冲区溢出)). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-120 represents a critical memory safety vulnerability where software copies data into a fixed-size buffer without validating the input’s length against the destination’s capacity. This classic buffer overflow occurs when an attacker supplies input exceeding the allocated memory space, causing data to spill into adjacent memory regions. Exploitation typically involves injecting malicious code or altering program control flow, such as overwriting return addresses to execute arbitrary commands. Developers prevent this weakness by implementing rigorous bounds checking before any copy operation, ensuring the input size never exceeds the buffer’s limits. Utilizing safer, language-specific functions that automatically handle size verification, or adopting modern programming languages with built-in memory safety features, effectively mitigates this risk and preserves application integrity against memory corruption attacks.

MITRE CWE Description
The product copies an input buffer to an output buffer without verifying that the size of the input buffer is less than the size of the output buffer.
Common Consequences (2)
Integrity, Confidentiality, AvailabilityModify Memory, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands
Buffer overflows often can be used to execute arbitrary code, which is usually outside the scope of the product's implicit security policy. This can often be used to subvert any other security service.
AvailabilityModify Memory, DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU)
Buffer overflows generally lead to crashes. Other attacks leading to lack of availability are possible, including putting the product into an infinite loop.
Mitigations (5)
RequirementsUse a language that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, many languages that perform their own memory management, such as Java and Perl, are not subject to buffer overflows. Other languages, such as Ada and C#, typically provide overflow protection, but the protection can be disabled by the programmer. Be wary that a lan…
Architecture and DesignUse a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. Examples include the Safe C String Library (SafeStr) by Messier and Viega [REF-57], and the Strsafe.h library from Microsoft [REF-56]. These libraries provide safer versions of overflow-prone string-handling functions.
Operation, Build and CompilationUse automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index checking. D3-SFCV (Stack Frame Canary Validation) from D3FEND [REF-1334] discusses…
Effectiveness: Defense in Depth
ImplementationConsider adhering to the following rules when allocating and managing an application's memory: Double check that your buffer is as large as you specify. When using functions that accept a number of bytes to copy, such as strncpy(), be aware that if the destination buffer size is equal to the source buffer size, it may not NULL-terminate the string. Check buffer boundaries if accessing the buffer i…
ImplementationAssume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range…
Examples (2)
The following code asks the user to enter their last name and then attempts to store the value entered in the last_name array.
char last_name[20]; printf ("Enter your last name: "); scanf ("%s", last_name);
Bad · C
The following code attempts to create a local copy of a buffer to perform some manipulations to the data.
void manipulate_string(char * string){ char buf[24]; strcpy(buf, string); ... }
Bad · C
CVE IDTitleCVSSSeverityPublished
CVE-2020-37179 APKF Product Key Finder 2.5.8.0 - 'Name' Denial of Service — Nsauditor APKF Product Key Finder 7.5 High2026-02-11
CVE-2020-37175 P2PWIFICAM2 for iOS 10.4.1 - 'Camera ID' Denial of Service — P2PWIFICAM2 for iOS 7.5 High2026-02-11
CVE-2025-48723 Qsync Central — Qsync Central 9.1 -2026-02-11
CVE-2025-48724 Qsync Central — Qsync Central 9.1 -2026-02-11
CVE-2025-48725 QuTS hero — QuTS hero 8.1 -2026-02-11
CVE-2025-52868 Qsync Central — Qsync Central 9.1 -2026-02-11
CVE-2025-52869 Qsync Central — Qsync Central 9.1AICriticalAI2026-02-11
CVE-2025-52870 Qsync Central — Qsync Central 9.1AICriticalAI2026-02-11
CVE-2026-2203 Tenda AC8 Embedded Httpd Service fast_setting_wifi_set buffer overflow — AC8 8.8 High2026-02-09
CVE-2026-2202 Tenda AC8 httpd WifiGuestSet fromSetWifiGusetBasic buffer overflow — AC8 8.8 High2026-02-09
CVE-2026-2140 Tenda TX9 setMacFilterCfg sub_4223E0 buffer overflow — TX9 8.8 High2026-02-08
CVE-2026-2139 Tenda TX9 fast_setting_wifi_set sub_432580 buffer overflow — TX9 8.8 High2026-02-08
CVE-2026-2138 Tenda TX9 SetStaticRouteCfg sub_42D03C buffer overflow — TX9 8.8 High2026-02-08
CVE-2026-2137 Tenda TX3 SetIpMacBind buffer overflow — TX3 8.8 High2026-02-08
CVE-2026-2086 UTT HiPER 810G Management formFireWall strcpy buffer overflow — HiPER 810G 8.8 High2026-02-07
CVE-2026-2071 UTT 进取 520W formP2PLimitConfig strcpy buffer overflow — 进取 520W 8.8 High2026-02-07
CVE-2020-37171 TapinRadio 2.12.3 - 'username' Denial of Service — TapinRadio 6.2 Medium2026-02-06
CVE-2020-37166 AbsoluteTelnet 11.12 - 'SSH2/username' Denial of Service — AbsoluteTelnet 6.2 Medium2026-02-06
CVE-2020-37165 AbsoluteTelnet 11.12 - "license name" Denial of Service — AbsoluteTelnet 6.2 Medium2026-02-06
CVE-2020-37170 TapinRadio 2.12.3 - 'address' Denial of Service — TapinRadio 6.2 Medium2026-02-06
CVE-2020-37164 AbsoluteTelnet 11.12 - "license entry" Denial of Service — AbsoluteTelnet 6.2 Medium2026-02-06
CVE-2020-37155 Core FTP Lite 1.3 - Denial of Service (PoC) — Core FTP Lite 7.5 High2026-02-06
CVE-2020-37109 aSc TimeTables 2020.11.4 - Denial of Service — aSc TimeTables 7.5 High2026-02-06
CVE-2020-37107 Core FTP LE 2.2 - Denial of Service — Core FTP LE 7.5 High2026-02-06
CVE-2026-2070 UTT 进取 520W formPolicyRouteConf strcpy buffer overflow — 进取 520W 8.8 High2026-02-06
CVE-2026-2068 UTT 进取 520W formSyslogConf strcpy buffer overflow — 进取 520W 8.8 High2026-02-06
CVE-2026-2067 UTT 进取 520W formTimeGroupConfig strcpy buffer overflow — 进取 520W 8.8 High2026-02-06
CVE-2026-2066 UTT 进取 520W formIpGroupConfig strcpy buffer overflow — 进取 520W 8.8 High2026-02-06
CVE-2020-37130 Nsauditor 3.2.0.0 - 'Name' Denial of Service — Nsauditor 7.5 High2026-02-05
CVE-2020-37131 Product Key Explorer 4.2.2.0 - 'Key' Denial of Service — Product Key Explorer 6.2 Medium2026-02-05

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-120 (未进行输入大小检查的缓冲区拷贝(传统缓冲区溢出)) represent 1767 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.