Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1000 CNY

100.0%

CWE-843 (使用不兼容类型访问资源(类型混淆)) — Vulnerability Class 348

348 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-843 (使用不兼容类型访问资源(类型混淆)). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-843, Type Confusion, is a critical memory safety weakness where a resource is initialized with one data type but subsequently accessed using an incompatible type. This discrepancy often triggers logical errors or undefined behavior, particularly in memory-unsafe languages like C and C++, where the program misinterprets the underlying bit patterns. Attackers typically exploit this vulnerability by crafting malicious inputs that force the application to treat a pointer or object as a different type, potentially leading to arbitrary code execution, data corruption, or denial of service. To mitigate this risk, developers must enforce strict type checking and validation at runtime. Utilizing memory-safe programming languages, implementing comprehensive unit tests for type assertions, and employing static analysis tools can effectively detect these mismatches before deployment, ensuring that resources are always accessed according to their intended definitions.

MITRE CWE Description
The product allocates or initializes a resource such as a pointer, object, or variable using one type, but it later accesses that resource using a type that is incompatible with the original type. When the product accesses the resource using an incompatible type, this could trigger logical errors because the resource does not have expected properties. In languages without memory safety, such as C and C++, type confusion can lead to out-of-bounds memory access. While this weakness is frequently associated with unions when parsing data with many different embedded object types in C, it can be present in any application that can interpret the same variable or memory location in multiple ways. This weakness is not unique to C and C++. For example, errors in PHP applications can be triggered by providing array parameters when scalars are expected, or vice versa. Languages such as Perl, which perform automatic conversion of a variable of one type when it is accessed as if it were another type, can also contain these issues.
Common Consequences (1)
Availability, Integrity, ConfidentialityRead Memory, Modify Memory, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands, DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart
When a memory buffer is accessed using the wrong type, it could read or write memory out of the bounds of the buffer, if the allocated buffer is smaller than the type that the code is attempting to access, leading to a crash and possibly code execution.
Examples (2)
The following code uses a union to support the representation of different types of messages. It formats messages differently, depending on their type.
#define NAME_TYPE 1 #define ID_TYPE 2 struct MessageBuffer { int msgType; union { char *name; int nameID; }; }; int main (int argc, char **argv) { struct MessageBuffer buf; char *defaultMessage = "Hello World"; buf.msgType = NAME_TYPE; buf.name = defaultMessage; printf("Pointer of buf.name is %p\n", buf.name); /* This particular value for nameID is used to make the code architecture-independent. If coming from untrusted input, it could be any value. */ buf.nameID = (int)(defaultMessage + 1); printf("Pointer of buf.name is now %p\n", buf.name); if (buf.msgType == NAME_TYPE) { printf("Message: %
Bad · C
The following PHP code accepts a value, adds 5, and prints the sum.
$value = $_GET['value']; $sum = $value + 5; echo "value parameter is '$value'<p>"; echo "SUM is $sum";
Bad · PHP
CVE IDTitleCVSSSeverityPublished
CVE-2025-1920 Google Chrome 安全漏洞 — Chrome 8.8 -2025-03-10
CVE-2025-2135 Google Chrome 安全漏洞 — Chrome 8.8 -2025-03-10
CVE-2024-53427 jq 安全漏洞 — jq 8.1 High2025-02-26
CVE-2024-11346 Access of Resource Using Incompatible Type in Postscript interpreter — CX, XC, CS, MS, MX, XM, et. al. 7.3 High2025-02-13
CVE-2024-11344 Type confusion vulnerability in the Postscript interpreter in various Lexmark devices — CX, XC, CS, MS, MX, XM, et. al. 7.3 High2025-02-13
CVE-2025-21342 Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) 8.8 High2025-02-06
CVE-2025-21408 Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) 8.8 High2025-02-06
CVE-2025-21279 Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) 6.5 Medium2025-02-06
CVE-2025-0147 Zoom Workplace App for Linux - Type Confusion — Zoom Workplace App for Linux 8.8 High2025-01-30
CVE-2025-22153 try/except* clauses could allow bypass RestrictedPython via type confusion bug in the CPython interpreter — RestrictedPython 7.9 High2025-01-23
CVE-2025-21326 Internet Explorer Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Windows Server 2022, 23H2 Edition (Server Core installation) 7.8 High2025-01-14
CVE-2025-21225 Windows Remote Desktop Gateway (RD Gateway) Denial of Service Vulnerability — Windows Server 2016 5.9 Medium2025-01-14
CVE-2025-21356 Microsoft Office Visio Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Microsoft 365 Apps for Enterprise 7.8 High2025-01-14
CVE-2024-13275 Security Kit - Less critical - Denial of Service - SA-CONTRIB-2024-039 — Security Kit 7.5 -2025-01-09
CVE-2025-22151 Strawberry GraphQL has a type resolution vulnerability — strawberry 3.7 Low2025-01-09
CVE-2025-0291 Google Chrome 安全漏洞 — Chrome 8.8 -2025-01-08
CVE-2024-13049 Ashlar-Vellum Cobalt XE File Parsing Type Confusion Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Cobalt 7.8 -2024-12-30
CVE-2024-13047 Ashlar-Vellum Cobalt CO File Parsing Type Confusion Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Cobalt 7.8 -2024-12-30
CVE-2024-12836 Delta Electronics DRASimuCAD STP File Parsing Type Confusion Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — DRASimuCAD 7.8 -2024-12-30
CVE-2024-12834 Delta Electronics DRASimuCAD STP File Parsing Type Confusion Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — DRASimuCAD 7.8 -2024-12-30
CVE-2024-12692 Google Chrome 安全漏洞 — Chrome 8.8 -2024-12-18
CVE-2024-12381 Google Chrome 安全漏洞 — Chrome 8.8 -2024-12-11
CVE-2024-49119 Windows Remote Desktop Services Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Windows Server 2019 8.1 High2024-12-10
CVE-2024-12053 Google Chrome 安全漏洞 — Chrome 8.8 -2024-12-03
CVE-2024-11507 IrfanView DXF File Parsing Type Confusion Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — IrfanView 7.8 -2024-11-22
CVE-2024-11508 IrfanView DXF File Parsing Type Confusion Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — IrfanView 7.8 -2024-11-22
CVE-2024-11395 Google Chrome 安全漏洞 — Chrome 8.8AIHighAI2024-11-19
CVE-2024-43498 .NET and Visual Studio Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — PowerShell 7.5 9.8 Critical2024-11-12
CVE-2024-20106 MediaTek Chipsets 安全漏洞 — MT6739, MT6761, MT6765, MT6768, MT6779, MT6785, MT6853, MT6873, MT6885, MT8666, MT8667, MT8673, MT8678 6.7AIMediumAI2024-11-04
CVE-2024-10230 Google Chrome 安全漏洞 — Chrome 8.8AIHighAI2024-10-22

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-843 (使用不兼容类型访问资源(类型混淆)) represent 348 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.