Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1000 CNY

100.0%

CWE-843 (使用不兼容类型访问资源(类型混淆)) — Vulnerability Class 348

348 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-843 (使用不兼容类型访问资源(类型混淆)). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-843, Type Confusion, is a critical memory safety weakness where a resource is initialized with one data type but subsequently accessed using an incompatible type. This discrepancy often triggers logical errors or undefined behavior, particularly in memory-unsafe languages like C and C++, where the program misinterprets the underlying bit patterns. Attackers typically exploit this vulnerability by crafting malicious inputs that force the application to treat a pointer or object as a different type, potentially leading to arbitrary code execution, data corruption, or denial of service. To mitigate this risk, developers must enforce strict type checking and validation at runtime. Utilizing memory-safe programming languages, implementing comprehensive unit tests for type assertions, and employing static analysis tools can effectively detect these mismatches before deployment, ensuring that resources are always accessed according to their intended definitions.

MITRE CWE Description
The product allocates or initializes a resource such as a pointer, object, or variable using one type, but it later accesses that resource using a type that is incompatible with the original type. When the product accesses the resource using an incompatible type, this could trigger logical errors because the resource does not have expected properties. In languages without memory safety, such as C and C++, type confusion can lead to out-of-bounds memory access. While this weakness is frequently associated with unions when parsing data with many different embedded object types in C, it can be present in any application that can interpret the same variable or memory location in multiple ways. This weakness is not unique to C and C++. For example, errors in PHP applications can be triggered by providing array parameters when scalars are expected, or vice versa. Languages such as Perl, which perform automatic conversion of a variable of one type when it is accessed as if it were another type, can also contain these issues.
Common Consequences (1)
Availability, Integrity, ConfidentialityRead Memory, Modify Memory, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands, DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart
When a memory buffer is accessed using the wrong type, it could read or write memory out of the bounds of the buffer, if the allocated buffer is smaller than the type that the code is attempting to access, leading to a crash and possibly code execution.
Examples (2)
The following code uses a union to support the representation of different types of messages. It formats messages differently, depending on their type.
#define NAME_TYPE 1 #define ID_TYPE 2 struct MessageBuffer { int msgType; union { char *name; int nameID; }; }; int main (int argc, char **argv) { struct MessageBuffer buf; char *defaultMessage = "Hello World"; buf.msgType = NAME_TYPE; buf.name = defaultMessage; printf("Pointer of buf.name is %p\n", buf.name); /* This particular value for nameID is used to make the code architecture-independent. If coming from untrusted input, it could be any value. */ buf.nameID = (int)(defaultMessage + 1); printf("Pointer of buf.name is now %p\n", buf.name); if (buf.msgType == NAME_TYPE) { printf("Message: %
Bad · C
The following PHP code accepts a value, adds 5, and prints the sum.
$value = $_GET['value']; $sum = $value + 5; echo "value parameter is '$value'<p>"; echo "SUM is $sum";
Bad · PHP
CVE IDTitleCVSSSeverityPublished
CVE-2025-59233 Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Microsoft 365 Apps for Enterprise 7.8 High2025-10-14
CVE-2025-59231 Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Microsoft 365 Apps for Enterprise 7.8 High2025-10-14
CVE-2025-11731 Libxslt: type confusion in exsltfuncresultcompfunction of libxslt 3.1 Low2025-10-14
CVE-2025-10585 Google Chrome 安全漏洞 — Chrome 8.8AIHighAI2025-09-24
CVE-2025-8354 RFA File Parsing Type Confusion Vulnerability — Revit 7.8 High2025-09-23
CVE-2025-59717 do-markdownit 安全漏洞 — @digitalocean/do-markdownit 5.4 Medium2025-09-19
CVE-2025-8002 Ashlar-Vellum Cobalt CO File Parsing Type Confusion Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Cobalt 7.8AIHighAI2025-09-17
CVE-2025-8005 Ashlar-Vellum Cobalt XE File Parsing Type Confusion Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Cobalt 7.8AIHighAI2025-09-17
CVE-2025-8000 Ashlar-Vellum Cobalt LI File Parsing Type Confusion Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Cobalt 7.8AIHighAI2025-09-17
CVE-2025-7995 Ashlar-Vellum Cobalt CO File Parsing Type Confusion Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Cobalt 7.8AIHighAI2025-09-17
CVE-2025-7999 Ashlar-Vellum Cobalt AR File Parsing Type Confusion Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Cobalt 7.8AIHighAI2025-09-17
CVE-2025-54915 Windows Defender Firewall Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability — Windows 10 Version 1507 6.7 Medium2025-09-09
CVE-2025-54109 Windows Defender Firewall Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability — Windows 10 Version 1507 6.7 Medium2025-09-09
CVE-2025-54104 Windows Defender Firewall Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability — Windows 10 Version 1507 6.7 Medium2025-09-09
CVE-2025-54094 Windows Defender Firewall Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability — Windows 10 Version 1507 6.7 Medium2025-09-09
CVE-2025-53810 Windows Defender Firewall Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability — Windows 10 Version 1507 6.7 Medium2025-09-09
CVE-2025-53808 Windows Defender Firewall Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability — Windows 10 Version 1507 6.7 Medium2025-09-09
CVE-2023-31322 AMD Graphics Driver 安全漏洞 — AMD Radeon™ RX 7000 Series Graphics Products 8.7 High2025-09-06
CVE-2025-26496 Salesforce Tableau Server和Salesforce Tableau Desktop 安全漏洞 — Tableau Server, Tableau Desktop 7.1 -2025-08-22
CVE-2025-50155 Windows Push Notifications Apps Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability — Windows 10 Version 1507 7.8 High2025-08-12
CVE-2025-53739 Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Microsoft 365 Apps for Enterprise 7.8 High2025-08-12
CVE-2025-53725 Windows Push Notifications Apps Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability — Windows 10 Version 1507 7.8 High2025-08-12
CVE-2025-53726 Windows Push Notifications Apps Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability — Windows 10 Version 1507 7.8 High2025-08-12
CVE-2025-53724 Windows Push Notifications Apps Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability — Windows 10 Version 1507 7.8 High2025-08-12
CVE-2025-53145 Microsoft Message Queuing (MSMQ) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Windows 10 Version 1507 8.8 High2025-08-12
CVE-2025-53144 Microsoft Message Queuing (MSMQ) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Windows 10 Version 1507 8.8 High2025-08-12
CVE-2025-53143 Microsoft Message Queuing (MSMQ) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Windows 10 Version 1507 8.8 High2025-08-12
CVE-2025-50176 DirectX Graphics Kernel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Windows 11 version 22H2 7.8 High2025-08-12
CVE-2025-50168 Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability — Windows 11 version 22H2 7.8 High2025-08-12
CVE-2025-27536 arkcompiler_ets_runtime has a type confusion vulnerability — OpenHarmony 3.3 Low2025-08-11

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-843 (使用不兼容类型访问资源(类型混淆)) represent 348 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.