Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1325 CNY

100%

CWE-79 (在Web页面生成时对输入的转义处理不恰当(跨站脚本)) — Vulnerability Class 22442

22442 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-79 (在Web页面生成时对输入的转义处理不恰当(跨站脚本)). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-79 represents a critical input validation weakness where software fails to properly sanitize user-supplied data before rendering it in web pages. Attackers typically exploit this vulnerability by injecting malicious scripts, often JavaScript, into trusted websites. When other users view the compromised page, the embedded code executes in their browsers, allowing the attacker to steal session cookies, hijack accounts, or redirect victims to phishing sites. This breach of trust undermines user privacy and application integrity. To prevent such attacks, developers must implement robust input validation and output encoding strategies. By strictly filtering incoming data and ensuring that all dynamic content is properly escaped before being processed by the browser, developers can neutralize dangerous inputs and effectively mitigate the risk of cross-site scripting vulnerabilities.

MITRE CWE Description
The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users. There are many variants of cross-site scripting, characterized by a variety of terms or involving different attack topologies. However, they all indicate the same fundamental weakness: improper neutralization of dangerous input between the adversary and a victim.
Common Consequences (3)
Access Control, ConfidentialityBypass Protection Mechanism, Read Application Data
The most common attack performed with cross-site scripting involves the disclosure of private information stored in user cookies, such as session information. Typically, a malicious user will craft a client-side script, which -- when parsed by a web browser -- performs some activity on behalf of the…
Integrity, Confidentiality, AvailabilityExecute Unauthorized Code or Commands
In some circumstances it may be possible to run arbitrary code on a victim's computer when cross-site scripting is combined with other flaws, for example, "drive-by hacking."
Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability, Access ControlExecute Unauthorized Code or Commands, Bypass Protection Mechanism, Read Application Data
The consequence of an XSS attack is the same regardless of whether it is stored or reflected. The difference is in how the payload arrives at the server. XSS can cause a variety of problems for the end user that range in severity from an annoyance to complete account compromise. Some cross-site scri…
Mitigations (5)
Architecture and DesignUse a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482]. Examples of libraries and frameworks that make it easier to generate properly encoded output include Microsoft's Anti-XSS library, the OWASP ESAPI Encoding module, and Apache Wicket.
Implementation, Architecture and DesignUnderstand the context in which your data will be used and the encoding that will be expected. This is especially important when transmitting data between different components, or when generating outputs that can contain multiple encodings at the same time, such as web pages or multi-part mail messages. Study all expected communication protocols and data representations to determine the required e…
Architecture and Design, ImplementationUnderstand all the potential areas where untrusted inputs can enter your software: parameters or arguments, cookies, anything read from the network, environment variables, reverse DNS lookups, query results, request headers, URL components, e-mail, files, filenames, databases, and any external systems that provide data to the application. Remember that such inputs may be obtained indirectly throug…
Effectiveness: Limited
Architecture and DesignFor any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
Architecture and DesignIf available, use structured mechanisms that automatically enforce the separation between data and code. These mechanisms may be able to provide the relevant quoting, encoding, and validation automatically, instead of relying on the developer to provide this capability at every point where output is generated.
Examples (2)
The following code displays a welcome message on a web page based on the HTTP GET username parameter (covers a Reflected XSS (Type 1) scenario).
$username = $_GET['username']; echo '<div class="header"> Welcome, ' . $username . '</div>';
Bad · PHP
http://trustedSite.example.com/welcome.php?username=<Script Language="Javascript">alert("You've been attacked!");</Script>
Attack
The following code displays a Reflected XSS (Type 1) scenario.
<% String eid = request.getParameter("eid"); %> ... Employee ID: <%= eid %>
Bad · JSP
<% protected System.Web.UI.WebControls.TextBox Login; protected System.Web.UI.WebControls.Label EmployeeID; ... EmployeeID.Text = Login.Text; %> <p><asp:label id="EmployeeID" runat="server" /></p>
Bad · ASP.NET
CVE IDTitleCVSSSeverityPublished
CVE-2022-29421 WordPress Countdown & Clock plugin <= 2.3.2 - Reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — Countdown & Clock (WordPress plugin) 4.7 Medium2022-05-06
CVE-2022-29420 WordPress Countdown & Clock plugin <= 2.3.2 - Auth. Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — Countdown & Clock (WordPress plugin) 5.9 Medium2022-05-06
CVE-2021-36912 Andrea Pernici News Sitemap for Google plugin <= 1.0.16 - Authenticated Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — Andrea Pernici News Sitemap for Google (WordPress plugin) 5.4 Medium2022-05-06
CVE-2022-27183 Reflected XSS in a query parameter of the Monitoring Console — Splunk Enterprise 8.8 High2022-05-06
CVE-2022-24899 Cross site scripting via canonical tag — contao 7.2 High2022-05-05
CVE-2022-29172 HTML injection with additional signup fields — lock 6.1 Medium2022-05-05
CVE-2021-44053 Reflected XSS — QTS 5.7 Medium2022-05-05
CVE-2022-28716 F5 BIG-IP 跨站脚本漏洞 — BIG-IP 7.5 High2022-05-05
CVE-2022-28707 F5 BIG-IP 跨站脚本漏洞 — BIG-IP 8.0 High2022-05-05
CVE-2022-27880 F5 Traffix SDC 跨站脚本漏洞 — Traffix SDC 4.8 Medium2022-05-05
CVE-2022-27878 F5 BIG-IP 多款产品跨站脚本漏洞 — BIG-IP 6.8 Medium2022-05-05
CVE-2022-27230 F5 BIG-IP APM 跨站脚本漏洞 — BIG-IP APM 7.5 High2022-05-05
CVE-2022-1464 Stored xss bug in gogs/gogs — gogs/gogs 5.4 -2022-05-05
CVE-2022-1590 Bludit New Content Module new-content cross site scripting — Bludit 3.5 Low2022-05-05
CVE-2022-1584 Reflected XSS in microweber/microweber — microweber/microweber 6.1 -2022-05-04
CVE-2022-25784 User controllable HTML element attribute (potential XSS) — SiteManager 9.1 Critical2022-05-04
CVE-2022-25781 Reflected XSS issues in GateManager — GateManager 4.2 Medium2022-05-04
CVE-2022-1571 Cross-site scripting - Reflected in Create Subaccount in neorazorx/facturascripts — neorazorx/facturascripts 6.1 -2022-05-04
CVE-2022-1555 DOM XSS in microweber ver 1.2.15 in microweber/microweber — microweber/microweber 6.1 -2022-05-04
CVE-2022-20627 Cisco Firepower Management Center Software Cross-Site Scripting Vulnerabilities — Cisco Firepower Management Center 5.4 Medium2022-05-03
CVE-2022-20628 Cisco Firepower Management Center Software Cross-Site Scripting Vulnerabilities — Cisco Firepower Management Center 5.4 Medium2022-05-03
CVE-2022-20629 Cisco Firepower Management Center Software Cross-Site Scripting Vulnerabilities — Cisco Firepower Management Center 5.4 Medium2022-05-03
CVE-2021-36844 WordPress WP Subscribe plugin <= 1.2.12 - Authenticated Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — WP Subscribe (WordPress plugin) 3.4 Low2022-05-02
CVE-2021-41810 Script injection in M-Files Admin — M-Files Server 5.2 Medium2022-05-02
CVE-2022-26325 Cross Site Scripting vulnerability in NetIQ Access Manager versions prior to version 5.0.2 — NetIQ Access Manager 2.9 Low2022-05-02
CVE-2022-1282 Photo Gallery < 1.6.3 - Reflected Cross-Site Scripting — Photo Gallery by 10Web – Mobile-Friendly Image Gallery 6.1 -2022-05-02
CVE-2022-1269 Fast Flow < 1.2.12 - Reflected Cross-Site Scripting — Fast Flow 6.1 -2022-05-02
CVE-2022-1255 Import and export users and customers < 1.19.2.1 - Admin+ Stored Cross-Site Scripting — Import and export users and customers 4.8 -2022-05-02
CVE-2022-1250 LifterLMS PayPal < 1.4.0 - Reflected Cross-Site Scripting — LifterLMS Paypal 6.1 -2022-05-02
CVE-2022-1046 Visual Form Builder < 3.0.7 - Admin+ Stored Cross-Site Scripting — Visual Form Builder 4.8 -2022-05-02

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-79 (在Web页面生成时对输入的转义处理不恰当(跨站脚本)) represent 22442 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.