Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1000 CNY

100.0%

CWE-78 (OS命令中使用的特殊元素转义处理不恰当(OS命令注入)) — Vulnerability Class 2740

2740 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-78 (OS命令中使用的特殊元素转义处理不恰当(OS命令注入)). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-78 represents a critical input validation weakness where software constructs operating system commands using untrusted external data without proper sanitization. Attackers typically exploit this by injecting malicious shell metacharacters, such as semicolons or pipes, into user-supplied fields like form inputs or URL parameters. This manipulation allows the attacker to alter the intended command structure, enabling arbitrary code execution, data exfiltration, or complete system compromise. To mitigate this risk, developers must strictly avoid passing user input directly to OS command interpreters. Instead, they should utilize safe, language-specific APIs that do not invoke the shell, or implement rigorous input validation and parameterization techniques. By treating all external data as inherently untrusted and applying strict allow-list filtering, organizations can effectively neutralize special elements and prevent command injection vulnerabilities.

MITRE CWE Description
The product constructs all or part of an OS command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended OS command when it is sent to a downstream component. This weakness can lead to a vulnerability in environments in which the attacker does not have direct access to the operating system, such as in web applications. Alternately, if the weakness occurs in a privileged program, it could allow the attacker to specify commands that normally would not be accessible, or to call alternate commands with privileges that the attacker does not have. The problem is exacerbated if the compromised process does not follow the principle of least privilege, because the attacker-controlled commands may run with special system privileges that increases the amount of damage. There are at least two subtypes of OS command injection: The application intends to execute a single, fixed program that is under its own control. It intends to use externally-supplied inputs as arguments to that program. For example, the program might use system("nslookup [HOSTNAME]") to run nslookup and allow the user to supply a HOSTNAME, which is used as an argument. Attackers cannot prevent nslookup from executing. However, if the program does not remove command separators from the HOSTNAME argument, attackers could place the separators into the arguments, which allows them to execute their own program afte…
Common Consequences (1)
Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability, Non-RepudiationExecute Unauthorized Code or Commands, DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, Read Files or Directories, Modify Files or Directories, Read Application Data, Modify Application Data, Hide Activities
Attackers could execute unauthorized operating system commands, which could then be used to disable the product, or read and modify data for which the attacker does not have permissions to access directly. Since the targeted application is directly executing the commands instead of the attacker, any…
Mitigations (5)
Architecture and DesignIf at all possible, use library calls rather than external processes to recreate the desired functionality.
Architecture and Design, OperationRun the code in a "jail" or similar sandbox environment that enforces strict boundaries between the process and the operating system. This may effectively restrict which files can be accessed in a particular directory or which commands can be executed by the software. OS-level examples include the Unix chroot jail, AppArmor, and SELinux. In general, managed code may provide some protection. For ex…
Effectiveness: Limited
Architecture and DesignFor any data that will be used to generate a command to be executed, keep as much of that data out of external control as possible. For example, in web applications, this may require storing the data locally in the session's state instead of sending it out to the client in a hidden form field.
Architecture and DesignFor any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
Architecture and DesignUse a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, consider using the ESAPI Encoding control [REF-45] or a similar tool, library, or framework. These will help the programmer encode outputs in a manner less prone to error.
Examples (2)
This example code intends to take the name of a user and list the contents of that user's home directory. It is subject to the first variant of OS command injection.
$userName = $_POST["user"]; $command = 'ls -l /home/' . $userName; system($command);
Bad · PHP
;rm -rf /
Attack
The following simple program accepts a filename as a command line argument and displays the contents of the file back to the user. The program is installed setuid root because it is intended for use as a learning tool to allow system administrators in-training to inspect privileged system files without giving them the ability to modify them or damage the system.
int main(int argc, char** argv) { char cmd[CMD_MAX] = "/usr/bin/cat "; strcat(cmd, argv[1]); system(cmd); }
Bad · C
CVE IDTitleCVSSSeverityPublished
CVE-2025-10775 Wavlink WL-NU516U1 login.cgi sub_4012A0 os command injection — WL-NU516U1 4.7 Medium2025-09-22
CVE-2025-10774 Ruijie 6000-E10 sub_commit.php os command injection — 6000-E10 4.7 Medium2025-09-22
CVE-2025-10767 CosmodiumCS OnlyRAT Configuration File main.py remote_download os command injection — OnlyRAT 4.5 Medium2025-09-21
CVE-2025-10568 HyperX NGENUITY - Arbitrary Code Execution — HyperX NGENUITY 8.8 -2025-09-19
CVE-2025-48703 Control Web Panel 操作系统命令注入漏洞 — CentOS Web Panel 9.0 Critical2025-09-19
CVE-2025-36143 IBM watsonx.data command execution — watsonx.data 4.7 Medium2025-09-18
CVE-2025-23316 NVIDIA Triton Inference Server 操作系统命令注入漏洞 — Triton Inference Server 9.8 Critical2025-09-17
CVE-2025-10619 sequa-ai sequa-mcp OAuth Server Discovery node-oauth-client-provider.ts redirectToAuthorization os command injection — sequa-mcp 6.3 Medium2025-09-17
CVE-2025-9972 Planet Technology|Industrial Cellular Gateway - OS Command Injection — ICG-2510WG-LTE (EU/US) 9.8 Critical2025-09-17
CVE-2025-10589 N-Partner|N-Reporter, N-Cloud, N-Probe - OS Command Injection — N-Reporter 8.8 High2025-09-17
CVE-2025-58116 I-O DATA WN-7D36QR 操作系统命令注入漏洞 — WN-7D36QR 7.2 High2025-09-17
CVE-2025-59518 LemonLDAP::NG 操作系统命令注入漏洞 — LemonLDAP::NG 8.0 High2025-09-17
CVE-2025-34184 Ilevia EVE X1 Server 4.7.18.0.eden Neuro-Core Unauthenticated Code Injection — EVE X1 Server 9.8AICriticalAI2025-09-16
CVE-2025-55211 FreePBX Post-Authenticated Command Injection — framework 7.2AIHighAI2025-09-15
CVE-2025-59361 OS command injection in Chaos Mesh via the cleanIptables mutation 9.8 Critical2025-09-15
CVE-2025-59360 OS command injection in Chaos Mesh via the killProcesses mutation 9.8 Critical2025-09-15
CVE-2025-59359 OS command injection in Chaos Mesh via the cleanTcs mutation 9.8 Critical2025-09-15
CVE-2025-10442 Tenda AC9/AC15 exeCommand formexeCommand os command injection — AC9 6.3 Medium2025-09-15
CVE-2025-10441 D-Link DI-8100G/DI-8200G/DI-8003G jhttpd version_upgrade.asp sub_433F7C os command injection — DI-8100G 6.3 Medium2025-09-15
CVE-2025-10440 D-Link DI-8100/DI-8100G/DI-8200/DI-8200G/DI-8003/DI-8003G jhttpd usb_paswd.asp sub_4621DC os command injection — DI-8100 6.3 Medium2025-09-15
CVE-2025-59377 mcp-kubernetes-server 安全漏洞 — mcp-kubernetes-server 3.7 Low2025-09-15
CVE-2025-10359 Wavlink WL-WN578W2 wireless.cgi sub_404DBC os command injection — WL-WN578W2 7.3 High2025-09-13
CVE-2025-10358 Wavlink WL-WN578W2 wireless.cgi sub_404850 os command injection — WL-WN578W2 7.3 High2025-09-13
CVE-2025-10328 MiczFlor RPi-Jukebox-RFID playsinglefile.php os command injection — RPi-Jukebox-RFID 6.3 Medium2025-09-12
CVE-2025-10327 MiczFlor RPi-Jukebox-RFID shuffle.php os command injection — RPi-Jukebox-RFID 6.3 Medium2025-09-12
CVE-2025-10326 MiczFlor RPi-Jukebox-RFID single.php os command injection — RPi-Jukebox-RFID 6.3 Medium2025-09-12
CVE-2025-27234 Zabbix Agent 2 smartctl plugin RCE vulnerability in Zabbix 5.0. — Zabbix 9.8 -2025-09-12
CVE-2025-10265 Digiever|NVR - OS Command Injection — DS-1200 8.8 High2025-09-12
CVE-2025-43885 Dell PowerProtect Data Manager 操作系统命令注入漏洞 — PowerProtect Data Manager 7.8 High2025-09-10
CVE-2025-43884 Dell PowerProtect Data Manager 操作系统命令注入漏洞 — PowerProtect Data Manager 8.2 High2025-09-10

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-78 (OS命令中使用的特殊元素转义处理不恰当(OS命令注入)) represent 2740 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.