Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1000 CNY

100.0%

CWE-787 (跨界内存写) — Vulnerability Class 2231

2231 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-787 (跨界内存写). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-787 represents a critical memory management weakness where software incorrectly writes data beyond the allocated boundaries of a buffer. This flaw typically arises from insufficient bounds checking, allowing attackers to overwrite adjacent memory locations with malicious payloads. Exploitation often leads to arbitrary code execution, denial of service, or privilege escalation by corrupting critical system structures or control flow data. Developers mitigate this risk by implementing rigorous input validation and utilizing safe programming practices that enforce strict boundary checks before any memory operation. Employing modern languages with automatic memory management, such as Rust or Java, further reduces exposure by preventing direct pointer arithmetic. Additionally, static analysis tools and fuzzing techniques help identify potential out-of-bounds conditions during the development lifecycle, ensuring that buffer operations remain within their intended limits and preserving application integrity against memory corruption attacks.

MITRE CWE Description
The product writes data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.
Common Consequences (3)
IntegrityModify Memory, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands
Write operations could cause memory corruption. In some cases, an adversary can modify control data such as return addresses in order to execute unexpected code.
AvailabilityDoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart
Attempting to access out-of-range, invalid, or unauthorized memory could cause the product to crash.
OtherUnexpected State
Subsequent write operations can produce undefined or unexpected results.
Mitigations (5)
RequirementsUse a language that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, many languages that perform their own memory management, such as Java and Perl, are not subject to buffer overflows. Other languages, such as Ada and C#, typically provide overflow protection, but the protection can be disabled by the programmer. Be wary that a lan…
Architecture and DesignUse a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. Examples include the Safe C String Library (SafeStr) by Messier and Viega [REF-57], and the Strsafe.h library from Microsoft [REF-56]. These libraries provide safer versions of overflow-prone string-handling functions.
Operation, Build and CompilationUse automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index checking. D3-SFCV (Stack Frame Canary Validation) from D3FEND [REF-1334] discusses…
Effectiveness: Defense in Depth
ImplementationConsider adhering to the following rules when allocating and managing an application's memory: Double check that the buffer is as large as specified. When using functions that accept a number of bytes to copy, such as strncpy(), be aware that if the destination buffer size is equal to the source buffer size, it may not NULL-terminate the string. Check buffer boundaries if accessing the buffer in a…
Operation, Build and CompilationRun or compile the software using features or extensions that randomly arrange the positions of a program's executable and libraries in memory. Because this makes the addresses unpredictable, it can prevent an attacker from reliably jumping to exploitable code. Examples include Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) [REF-58] [REF-60] and Position-Independent Executables (PIE) [REF-64]. Imported…
Effectiveness: Defense in Depth
Examples (2)
The following code attempts to save four different identification numbers into an array.
int id_sequence[3]; /* Populate the id array. */ id_sequence[0] = 123; id_sequence[1] = 234; id_sequence[2] = 345; id_sequence[3] = 456;
Bad · C
In the following code, it is possible to request that memcpy move a much larger segment of memory than assumed:
int returnChunkSize(void *) { /* if chunk info is valid, return the size of usable memory, * else, return -1 to indicate an error */ ... } int main() { ... memcpy(destBuf, srcBuf, (returnChunkSize(destBuf)-1)); ... }
Bad · C
CVE IDTitleCVSSSeverityPublished
CVE-2023-51452 DJI Mavic和Matrice 安全漏洞 — Mavic 3 Pro 3.0 Low2024-04-02
CVE-2024-24581 Arkcompiler runtime has an out-of-bounds write vulnerability — OpenHarmony 6.5 Medium2024-04-02
CVE-2024-27327 PDF-XChange Editor PDF File Parsing Out-Of-Bounds Write Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — PDF-XChange Editor 7.8 -2024-04-01
CVE-2024-2971 Out-of-bounds array access due to negative object numbers in indirect references in Xpdf 4.05 — Xpdf 2.9 Low2024-03-26
CVE-2024-21912 Rockwell Automation Arena Simulation vulnerable to out of bounds write — Arena Simulation 7.8 High2024-03-26
CVE-2024-29131 Apache Commons Configuration: StackOverflowError adding property in AbstractListDelimiterHandler.flattenIterator() — Apache Commons Configuration 9.8AICriticalAI2024-03-21
CVE-2024-29133 Apache Commons Configuration: StackOverflowError calling ListDelimiterHandler.flatten(Object, int) with a cyclical object tree — Apache Commons Configuration 9.8AICriticalAI2024-03-21
CVE-2024-21661 Argo CD Denial of Service (DoS) Vulnerability Due to Unsafe Array Modification in Multi-threaded Environment — argo-cd 7.5 High2024-03-18
CVE-2024-20761 Adobe Animate 2024 BMP File Parsing Out-Of-Bound Write Remote Code execution Vulnerability — Animate 7.8 High2024-03-18
CVE-2024-20756 Adobe Bridge 2024 Out of Bound Write Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Bridge 7.8 High2024-03-18
CVE-2024-20746 Adobe Premiere Pro Out-of-bounds Write Arbitrary code execution — Premiere Pro 7.8 High2024-03-18
CVE-2024-23139 ActionScript Byte Code “ABC” Vulnerability in the Autodesk FBX Review software — FBX Review 7.8 High2024-03-17
CVE-2023-42789 Fortinet FortiOS 缓冲区错误漏洞 — FortiOS 9.3 Critical2024-03-12
CVE-2024-27907 Siemens Simcenter Femap 缓冲区错误漏洞 — Simcenter Femap 7.8 High2024-03-12
CVE-2024-26001 PHOENIX CONTACT: Out of bounds write only memory access — CHARX SEC-3000 7.4 High2024-03-12
CVE-2024-1696 Santesoft Sante FFT Imaging Out-of-bounds Write — Sante FFT Imaging 7.8 High2024-03-11
CVE-2024-23611 Out of Bounds Write Due to Missing Bounds Check in LabVIEW — LabVIEW 7.8 High2024-03-11
CVE-2024-23610 Out of Bounds Write Due to Missing Bounds Check in LabVIEW — LabVIEW 7.8 High2024-03-11
CVE-2024-23608 Out of Bounds Write Due to Missing Bounds Check in LabVIEW — LabVIEW 7.8 High2024-03-11
CVE-2024-2184 Canon Small Office Multifunction Printers 安全漏洞 — Color imageCLASS MF740C Series 9.8 Critical2024-03-11
CVE-2024-28123 Wasmi Out-of-bounds Write for host to Wasm calls with more than 128 Parameters — wasmi 7.3 High2024-03-08
CVE-2023-51395 Z-Wave S0 Decryption Vulnerability in End Devices — Z-Wave SDK 8.8 High2024-03-07
CVE-2023-7243 Ethercat Zeek Plugin Out-of-bounds Write — Industrial Control Systems Network Protocol Parsers (ICSNPP) - Ethercat Plugin for Zeek 9.8 Critical2024-03-01
CVE-2023-7244 Ethercat Zeek Plugin Out-of-bounds Write — Industrial Control Systems Network Protocol Parsers (ICSNPP) - Ethercat Plugin for Zeek 9.8 Critical2024-03-01
CVE-2024-25578 MicroDicom DICOM Viewer Out-of-Bounds Write — DICOM Viewer 7.8 High2024-03-01
CVE-2024-23124 Multiple Vulnerabilities in the Autodesk AutoCAD Desktop Software — AutoCAD 7.8 High2024-02-22
CVE-2024-23123 Multiple Vulnerabilities in the Autodesk AutoCAD Desktop Software — AutoCAD 7.8 High2024-02-22
CVE-2024-23122 Multiple Vulnerabilities in the Autodesk AutoCAD Desktop Software — AutoCAD 7.8 High2024-02-22
CVE-2024-23121 Multiple Vulnerabilities in the Autodesk AutoCAD Desktop Software — AutoCAD 7.8 High2024-02-22
CVE-2024-23120 Multiple Vulnerabilities in the Autodesk AutoCAD Desktop Software — AutoCAD 7.8 High2024-02-21

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-787 (跨界内存写) represent 2231 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.