Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1000 CNY

100.0%

CWE-787 (跨界内存写) — Vulnerability Class 2231

2231 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-787 (跨界内存写). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-787 represents a critical memory management weakness where software incorrectly writes data beyond the allocated boundaries of a buffer. This flaw typically arises from insufficient bounds checking, allowing attackers to overwrite adjacent memory locations with malicious payloads. Exploitation often leads to arbitrary code execution, denial of service, or privilege escalation by corrupting critical system structures or control flow data. Developers mitigate this risk by implementing rigorous input validation and utilizing safe programming practices that enforce strict boundary checks before any memory operation. Employing modern languages with automatic memory management, such as Rust or Java, further reduces exposure by preventing direct pointer arithmetic. Additionally, static analysis tools and fuzzing techniques help identify potential out-of-bounds conditions during the development lifecycle, ensuring that buffer operations remain within their intended limits and preserving application integrity against memory corruption attacks.

MITRE CWE Description
The product writes data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.
Common Consequences (3)
IntegrityModify Memory, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands
Write operations could cause memory corruption. In some cases, an adversary can modify control data such as return addresses in order to execute unexpected code.
AvailabilityDoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart
Attempting to access out-of-range, invalid, or unauthorized memory could cause the product to crash.
OtherUnexpected State
Subsequent write operations can produce undefined or unexpected results.
Mitigations (5)
RequirementsUse a language that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, many languages that perform their own memory management, such as Java and Perl, are not subject to buffer overflows. Other languages, such as Ada and C#, typically provide overflow protection, but the protection can be disabled by the programmer. Be wary that a lan…
Architecture and DesignUse a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. Examples include the Safe C String Library (SafeStr) by Messier and Viega [REF-57], and the Strsafe.h library from Microsoft [REF-56]. These libraries provide safer versions of overflow-prone string-handling functions.
Operation, Build and CompilationUse automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index checking. D3-SFCV (Stack Frame Canary Validation) from D3FEND [REF-1334] discusses…
Effectiveness: Defense in Depth
ImplementationConsider adhering to the following rules when allocating and managing an application's memory: Double check that the buffer is as large as specified. When using functions that accept a number of bytes to copy, such as strncpy(), be aware that if the destination buffer size is equal to the source buffer size, it may not NULL-terminate the string. Check buffer boundaries if accessing the buffer in a…
Operation, Build and CompilationRun or compile the software using features or extensions that randomly arrange the positions of a program's executable and libraries in memory. Because this makes the addresses unpredictable, it can prevent an attacker from reliably jumping to exploitable code. Examples include Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) [REF-58] [REF-60] and Position-Independent Executables (PIE) [REF-64]. Imported…
Effectiveness: Defense in Depth
Examples (2)
The following code attempts to save four different identification numbers into an array.
int id_sequence[3]; /* Populate the id array. */ id_sequence[0] = 123; id_sequence[1] = 234; id_sequence[2] = 345; id_sequence[3] = 456;
Bad · C
In the following code, it is possible to request that memcpy move a much larger segment of memory than assumed:
int returnChunkSize(void *) { /* if chunk info is valid, return the size of usable memory, * else, return -1 to indicate an error */ ... } int main() { ... memcpy(destBuf, srcBuf, (returnChunkSize(destBuf)-1)); ... }
Bad · C
CVE IDTitleCVSSSeverityPublished
CVE-2023-32132 Sante DICOM Viewer Pro DCM File Parsing Out-Of-Bounds Write Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — DICOM Viewer Pro 7.8 -2024-05-03
CVE-2023-32131 Sante DICOM Viewer Pro DCM File Parsing Out-Of-Bounds Write Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — DICOM Viewer Pro 7.8 -2024-05-03
CVE-2023-27345 PDF-XChange Editor PDF File Parsing Out-Of-Bounds Write Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — PDF-XChange Editor 7.8 -2024-05-03
CVE-2023-27343 PDF-XChange Editor EMF File Parsing Out-Of-Bounds Write Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — PDF-XChange Editor 7.8 -2024-05-03
CVE-2023-27344 PDF-XChange Editor PDF File Parsing Out-Of-Bounds Write Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — PDF-XChange Editor 7.8 -2024-05-03
CVE-2023-27341 PDF-XChange Editor TIF File Parsing Out-Of-Bounds Write Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — PDF-XChange Editor 7.8 -2024-05-03
CVE-2023-27340 PDF-XChange Editor PNG File Parsing Out-Of-Bounds Write Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — PDF-XChange Editor 7.8 -2024-05-03
CVE-2023-27339 PDF-XChange Editor PNG File Parsing Out-Of-Bounds Write Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — PDF-XChange Editor 7.8 -2024-05-03
CVE-2024-20376 Cisco IP Phone 安全漏洞 — Cisco IP Phones with Multiplatform Firmware 7.5 High2024-05-01
CVE-2024-20357 Cisco IP Phone 安全漏洞 — Cisco IP Phones with Multiplatform Firmware 5.9 Medium2024-05-01
CVE-2024-4141 Out-of-bounds array write in Xpdf 4.05 due to incorrect bounds check — Xpdf 2.9 Low2024-04-24
CVE-2024-21979 AMD Radeon 安全漏洞 — AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition 5.3 Medium2024-04-23
CVE-2024-21972 AMD Radeon 安全漏洞 — AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition 5.3 Medium2024-04-23
CVE-2024-3900 Out-of-bounds stack array write in Xpdf 4.05 due to missing zero check — Xpdf 2.9 Low2024-04-17
CVE-2024-2961 GNU C Library 安全漏洞 — glibc 9.1AICriticalAI2024-04-17
CVE-2023-5406 Honeywell Experion Server 安全漏洞 — Experion Server 5.9 Medium2024-04-17
CVE-2023-5405 Honeywell Experion Server 安全漏洞 — Experion Server 5.9 Medium2024-04-17
CVE-2024-29218 Keyence KV STUDIO 安全漏洞 — KV STUDIO 7.8 -2024-04-15
CVE-2024-30271 Adobe Illustrator 2023 CC 27.7 Memory Corruption Out-Of-Bounds-Write Vulnerability III. — Illustrator 7.8 High2024-04-11
CVE-2024-30272 Adobe Illustrator 2024 GIF file parsing Out-Of-Bound Write remote code execution vulnerabiity — Illustrator 7.8 High2024-04-11
CVE-2024-22448 Dell BIOS 缓冲区错误漏洞 — CPG BIOS 4.7 Medium2024-04-10
CVE-2023-5912 Lenovo Notebook 安全漏洞 — Notebook BIOS 6.7 Medium2024-04-05
CVE-2024-3298 Out-Of-Bounds Write and Type Confusion vulnerabilities exist in the DWG and DXF file reading procedure in eDrawings from Release SOLIDWORKS 2023 through Release SOLIDWORKS 2024 — eDrawings 7.8 High2024-04-04
CVE-2024-27342 Kofax Power PDF PDF File Parsing Out-Of-Bounds Write Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Power PDF 7.8 -2024-04-03
CVE-2024-27339 Kofax Power PDF PDF File Parsing Out-Of-Bounds Write Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Power PDF 7.8 -2024-04-03
CVE-2024-30355 Foxit PDF Reader AcroForm Out-Of-Bounds Write Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — PDF Reader 7.8AIHighAI2024-04-02
CVE-2024-30349 Foxit PDF Reader U3D File Parsing Out-Of-Bounds Write Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — PDF Reader 7.8AIHighAI2024-04-02
CVE-2024-30348 Foxit PDF Reader U3D File Parsing Out-Of-Bounds Write Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — PDF Reader 7.8AIHighAI2024-04-02
CVE-2023-51454 DJI Mavic和Matrice 安全漏洞 — Mavic 3 Pro 6.8 Medium2024-04-02
CVE-2023-51453 DJI Mavic和Matrice 安全漏洞 — Mavic 3 Pro 3.0 Low2024-04-02

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-787 (跨界内存写) represent 2231 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.